Skip to main content
Log in

A Nonlinear Dynamic Optimization Algorithm of a Novel Energy Efficient Pneumatic Drive System

  • Regular Papers
  • Control Theory and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A standard pneumatic system is usually controlled by a 5/2 directional control valve in which compressed-air utilization rate is low. To solve the problem, scholars have proposed a bridge pneumatic circuit controlled by four switch valves that uses expansion energy of compressed air to do work. The key to this bridge circuit lies in the accuracy and speed of on-off sequence of the valves. To realize this goal, we study dynamic optimization control of the circuit and establish an optimal valve opening and closing time-sequence control model with a continuous-discrete time differential algebraic equation on the base of the dynamic characteristics of the pneumatic drive system. We use the direct method in modern optimal control theory to solve the problem. Because the model has the characteristics of more equality constraints, lower freedom of variables, and a sparse structure, we use the simplified space sequential quadratic programming algorithm and interior-point methods for computation and analysis so that the process optimization and partial-differential equations are solved simultaneously. To improve the precision and the speed of solving the derivative during the solution-optimization process, the derivative information is obtained with a combination of symbol and numerical automatic differentiation. By analyzing the efficiency of the two algorithms, the interior-point method was proved to be more suitable for use in obtaining the sequence. Finally, the experimental results were realized and showed that our contribution builds a good foundation for the energy-saving research of pneumatic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Saidur, N. A. Rahim, and M. Hasanuzzaman, “A review on compressed-air energy use and energy saving,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1135–1153, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. S̆es̆lija, I. Milenković, S. Dudić, and J. S̆ulc, “Improving energy efficiency in compressed air systems — practical experiences,” Thermal Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 355–370, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Doll, R. Neumann, and O. Sawodny, “Energy efficient use of compressed air in pneumatic drive systems for motion tasks,” Proc. of International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics, pp. 340–345, 2011.

  4. P. Harris, S. Nolan, and G. E. O’Donnell, “Energy optimisation of pneumatic actuator systems in manufacturing,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 35–45, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Du, W. Xiong, Z. Jiang, Q. Li, and L. Wang, “Energy efficiency control of pneumatic actuator systems through nonlinear dynamic optimization,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 184, pp. 511–519, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. T. Biegler, “An overview of simultaneous strategies for dynamic optimization,” Chemical Engineering & Processing Process Intensification, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1043–1053, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. T. Biegler, A. M. Cervantes, and A. Wächter, “Advances in simultaneous strategies for dynamic process optimization,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 575–593, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Čižniar, M. Podmajerský, T. Hirmajer, M. Fikar, and A. Latifi, “Global optimization for parameter estimation of differential-algebraic systems,” Chemical Papers, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 274–283, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. A. del Rio-Chanona, C. Bakker, F. Fiorelli, M. Paraskevopoulos, F. Scott, R. Conejeros, and V. Vassiliadis, “On the solution of differential-algebraic equations through gradient flow embedding,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 103, pp. 165–175, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. D. de Mello Jr., L. Martí, A. V. A. da Cruz, and M. M. B. R. Vellasco, “Evolutionary algorithms and elliptical copulas applied to continuous optimization problems,” Information Sciences, vol. 369, pp. 419–440, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Tang, L. He, S. Chen, and B. Shen, “System stability via stepping optimal control: Theory and applications,” Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 463–472, 2007.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. W. L. Luyben, “Optimum product recovery in chemical process design,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 53. no. 41, pp. 16044–16050, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Wang, X. Liu, and Z. Zhang, “An efficient interior-point algorithm with new non-monotone line search filter method for nonlinear constrained programming,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 290–310, 2016.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. T. Biegler and I. E. Grossmann, “Retrospective on optimization,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1169–1192, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. F. Feehery and P. I. Barton, “Dynamic optimization with state variable path constraints,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1241–1256, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Binder, A. Cruse, C. A. C. Villar, and W. Marquardt, “Dynamic optimization using a wavelet based adaptive control vector parameterization strategy,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1201–1207, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Hu, X. Liu, and A. Xue, “An improved control vector iteration approach for nonlinear dynamic optimization (II) problems without path constraints,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 141–145, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Li and X. Liu, “Optimal control problems with incomplete and different integral time domains in the objective and constraints,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 2883–2895, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Zhang, H. Chen, X. Liu, and Z. Zhang, “An iterative multi-objective particle swarm optimization-based control vector parameterization for state constrained chemical and biochemical engineering problems,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 103, pp. 138–151, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. T. Biegler and V. M. Zavala, “Large-scale nonlinear programming using IPOPT: An integrating framework for enterprise-wide dynamic optimization,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 575–582, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kameswaran and L. T. Biegler, “Simultaneous dynamic optimization strategies: Recent advances and challenges,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1560–1575, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Chen and X. Liu, “Improved orthogonal collocation method and its application to dynamic optimization problems of chemical process,” Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, vol. 30, pp. 220–225, 2009.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Maurer and C. Buskens, “SQP-methods for solving optimal control problems with control and state constraints: Adjoint variables, sensitivity analysis and real-time control,” Journal of Computational & Applied Mathematics, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 85–108, 2000.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Vanderbei and D. F. Shanno, “An interior-point algorithm for nonconvex nonlinear programming,” Computational Optimization & Applications, vol. 13, no. 1–3, pp. 231–252, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Obasanjo, G. Tzallas-Regas, and B. Rustem, “An interior-point algorithm for nonlinear minimax problems,” Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 291–318, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. G. M. Cho, “An interior-point algorithm for linear optimization based on a new barrier function,” Applied Mathematics & Computation, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 386–395, 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Sager, “Reformulations and algorithms for the optimization of switching decisions in nonlinear optimal control,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1238–1247, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Williams, “Hermite-Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto direct transcription in trajectory optimization,” Journal of Guidance Control Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1392–1395, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Wächter and L. T. Biegler, “On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 25–57, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Xiong.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075065) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (3132019352 and 3132022340). We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for providing linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Hongwang Du received his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from Dalian Maritime University of China in 2015. His research interests include nonlinear control, pneumatic technology, and system identification.

Wei Xiong received his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology of China in 2001. His research interests include nonlinear control, fluid transmission, and control.

Wei Liu received her Bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Dalian University in 2019 and she is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering at Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China. Her research interests include smart materials-based actuators and digital fluid power systems.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, H., Xiong, W. & Liu, W. A Nonlinear Dynamic Optimization Algorithm of a Novel Energy Efficient Pneumatic Drive System. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 20, 1593–1604 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0265-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0265-4

Keywords

Navigation