Passivity-based Voltage Controller for Tidal Energy Conversion System with Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator

Abstract

Nonlinear dynamical and time varying parameters of the permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG), make it difficult to control. This paper presents a new passivity-based control (PBC) of tidal turbine based PMSG, connected to the grid through a back-to-back converter. The control problem is challenging for at least two reasons. First, the dynamics of the conversion system are described by a highly coupled set of nonlinear differential equations and various uncertainties of the PMSG model. Second, it is preferable to operate this kind of systems at the point of maximum power, which is a nonlinear function. To this end, two kinds of control strategies have been used. A new passivity-based voltage controller (PBVC) design applied to the machine-side, that ensures asymptotic convergence to the MPPT is presented. A proportional integral derivative (PID) is added to design a desired torque dynamic in order to guarantee a fast convergence and stability of the closed loop system, which allows to the PMSG to operate at an optimal speed. Secondly, a classical proportional integral (PI) controllers is applied to the grid-side in order to regulate the DC-Link voltage and to deliver only the active power into distribution network. Finally, the obtained simulation results under MATLAB/Simulink, show that the proposed control strategy ensures stability and fast response of the DC-link voltage and the reactive power generated is extremely minimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. [1]

    Z. Zhou and M. E. H. Benbouzid, “Developments in large marine current turbine technologies-A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 71, pp. 852–858, May 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    K. Ghefiri, S. Bouallègue, J. H. K. Ghefiri, I. Garrido, and A. J. Garrido, “Modeling and MPPT control of a tidal stream generator,” Proc. of the 4th IEEE Int. Conf. on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, pp. 1003–1008, 2017.

  3. [3]

    N. Hafeez, S. Badshah, M. Badshah, and S. J. Khalil, “Effect of velocity shear on the performance and structural response of a small-scale horizontal axis tidal turbine,” Marine Systems & Ocean Technology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 51–58, September 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    X. Yin, M. Lei, and H. Pan, “Direct optimal power extraction control for a tidal turbine system based on fuzzy power tuning,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 426–433, December 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    F. M. David and R. Ortega, “Adaptive passivity-based control for maximum power extraction of stand-alone windmill systems,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 173–181, February 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    M. O. F. Diallo, S. Youssef, H. Gualous, M. B. Camara, and B. Dakyo, “Permanent magnet synchronous generator for tidal turbine application in Raz Blanchard — modeling and control strategy,” Proc. of IEEE 16th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference and Exposition, pp. 377–381, 2016.

  7. [7]

    M. Karabacak, J. Solsona, and C. Busada, “A new perturb and observe based higher order sliding mode MPPT control of wind turbines eliminating the rotor inertial effect,” Renewable Energy, vol. 133, pp. 807–827, April 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    M. A. Sollman, H. M. Hasanien, H. Z. Azizi, E. E. El-Kholy, and S. A. Mahmoud, “Linear quadratic regulator algorithm-based cascaded control scheme for performance enhancement of a variable-speed wind energy conversion system,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 2281–2293, March 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    A. H. M. A. Rahim and M. H. Khan, “A swarm-based adaptive neural network SMES control for a permanent magnet wind generator,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 7957–7965, November 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    J. Wang, D. Bo, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, and Q. Miao, “Adaptive back-stepping control for a permanent magnet synchronous generator wind energy conversion system,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 3240–3249, January 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    A. K. Eedara, C. S. Koritala, and S. R. Rayapudi, “Modified model predictive control of back-to back T-type NPC converter interfacing wind turbine-driven PMSG and electric grid,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 7047–7065, August 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    M. Abdelrahem, C. M. Hackl, Z. Zhang, and R. Kannel, “Robust predictive control for direct driven surface-mounted permanent-magnet synchronous generators without mechanical sensors,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 179–189, March 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    C. Wei, Z. Zhang, W. Qiao, and L. Qu, “An adaptive network-based reinforcement learning method for MPPT control of PMSG wind energy conversion systems,” IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 7837–7848, January 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    A. Y. Achour and B. Mendil, “Passivity based voltage controller-observer design with unknown load disturbance for permanent magnet synchronous motor,” Proc. of IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp. 201–206, 2014.

  15. [15]

    A. Y. Achour, B. Mendil, S. Bacha, and I. Munteanu, “Passivity-based current controller design for a permanentmagnet synchronous motor,” ISA Transactions, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 336–346, July 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    B. Yang, T. Yu, H. Shu, D. Qiu, Y. Zhang, P. Cao, and L. Jiang, “Passivity-based linear feedback control of permanent magnetic synchronous generator-based wind energy conversion system: design and analysis,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 981–991, June 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    R. Gao, I. Husain, R. Cisneros, and R. Ortega, “Passivity-based and standard PI controls application to wind energy conversion system,” Proc. of IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp. 1–5, 2016.

  18. [18]

    Y. Gui, C. Kim, and C. C. Chung, “Improved low-voltage ride through capability for PMSG wind turbine based on port-controlled Hamiltonian system,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1195–1204, October 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    B. Yang, H. Yu, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Sang, and L. Jing, “Passivity-based sliding-mode control design for optimal power extraction of a PMSG based variable speed wind turbine,” Renewable Energy, vol. 119, pp. 577–589, April 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    Y. Gu, W. Li, and X. He, “Passivity-based control of DC microgrid for self-disciplined stabilization,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2623–2632, September 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    J. Back and W. Ha, “Robust tracking of robot manipulators via momentum-based disturbance observer and passivity-based controller,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 976–985, April 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    H. Zakeri and P. J. Antsakli, “Recent advances in analysis and design of cyber-physical systems using passivity indices,” Proc. of IEEE 27th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), pp. 31–36, July 2019.

  23. [23]

    A. Benmouna, M. Becherif, D. Depemet, and M. A. Ebrahim, “Novel energy management technique for hybrid electric vehicle via interconnection and damping assignment passivity based control,” Renewable Energy, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 976–985, April 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    Y. Gao, J. Liu, G. Sun, M. Liu, and L. Wu, “Fault deviation estimation and integral sliding mode control design for Lipschitz nonlinear systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 123, pp. 8–15, January 2019.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    J. Liu, X. Su, M. Wack, and L. Wu, “Disturbance-observer-based control for air management of PEM fuel cell systems via sliding mode technique,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1129–1138, May 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    C. I. Byrnes, A. Isidori, and J. C. Willems, “Passivity, feedback equivalence, and the global stabilization of minimum phase nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1228–1240, November 1991.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    I. G. Polushin, D. J. Hill, and A. L. Fradkov, “Strict quasipassivity and ultimate boundedness for nonlinear control systems,” IFAC Proceeding Volumes, vol. 31, no. 17, pp. 505–510, July 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    Q. Zhou, Y. Gao, H. Li, and H. R. Karimi, “Control design for discrete-time fuzzy systems with disturbance inputs via delta operator approach,” Mathematica Problems in Engineering, vol. 13, Article ID724918, 13 pages, 2013.

  29. [29]

    A. Caliciotti, S. G. Nash, and M. Roma, “An adaptive truncation criterion, for linesearch-based truncated newton methods in large scale nonconvex optimization,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 7–12, January 2018.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. [30]

    A. Caliciotti, S. G. Nash, and M. Roma, “Data and performance profiles applying an adaptive truncation criterion, for linesearch-based truncated newton methods in large scale nonconvex optimization,” Data in Brief, vol. 31, no. 17, pp. 505–510, April 2018.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. [31]

    P. Qian, B. Feng, H. Liu, X. Tian, Y. Si, and D. Zhang, “Review on configuration and control methods of tidal current turbines,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 108, pp. 125–139, July 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [32]

    I. K. B. Hassine, M. W. Naouar, and N. M. Bellaaj, “Predictive control strategies for wind turbine system based on permanent magnet synchronous generator,” ISA Transactions, vol. 62, pp. 73–80, May 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. [33]

    A. Dahbi, M. Hachemi, N. Nait-Said, and M. S. Nait-Said, “Realization and control of a wind turbine connected to the grid by using PMSG,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 84, pp. 346–353, August 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. [34]

    B. Jain, S. Jain, and R. K. Nema, “Control strategies of grid interfaced wind energy conversion system: An overview,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 47, pp. 983–996, July 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. [35]

    H. H. H. Mousa, A. R. Youcef, and E. E. E. Mohamed, “Modified P&O MPPT algorithm for optimal power extraction of five-phase PMSG based wind generation system,” SN Applied Sciences, August 2019.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youcef Belkhier.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Yonghao Gui under the direction of Editor Young IL Lee.

Youcef Belkhier received his Master’s degree in automatic from the University of Bejaia, Algeria, in 2017, where he is currently working toward a Ph.D. degree. His research interests include electrical machines design, control, and renewable energy systems.

Abdelyazid Achour received his Magister degree from Polytechnic Military School (EMP), Algeria, in 1999 and his Doctoral grades from Bejaia University, Algeria, in 2009. Currently he is an associate professor of automatic and electrical engineering with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Bejaia, Algeria. His research interests include electrical machines design and control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belkhier, Y., Achour, A. Passivity-based Voltage Controller for Tidal Energy Conversion System with Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0938-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nonlinear control
  • passivity-based voltage controller
  • permanent-magnet synchronous generator (PMSG)
  • tidal turbine