Skip to main content

Iterative Learning Model Predictive Control Approaches for Trajectory Based Aircraft Operation with Controlled Time of Arrival

Abstract

In this work, iterative learning model predictive control approaches are presented to resolve the control problem of trajectory based aircraft operation with time-of-arrival constraint. Firstly, we formulated this problem being an output tracking issue with along-track wind disturbance. Next, P-type point-to-point iterative learning control algorithms are designed to overcome the influence of repetitive along-track wind. In addition, a point-topoint iterative learning model predictive control algorithm with variable prediction step is also designed to eliminate the interference of non-repetitive gusts on the air route. Finally, numerical simulations are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    JPDO, “Concept of operations for the next generation air transportation system (ver 3.2),” Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO), Washington D.C., Tech. Rep., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    SESAR, “European air traffic management master plan (edition 2015),” SESAR Consortium, Belgium, Tech. Rep., 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    JCAB, “Long-term vision for the future air traffic systems,” Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB), Japan, Tech. Rep., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    C. Wang, J. Guo, and Z. Shen, “Prediction of 4d trajectory based on basic flight models,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 295–300, Feb. 2009. 0.1109/ICIECS.2010.5678143

    Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    R. Dalmau and X. Prats, “Controlled time of arrival windows for already initiated energy-neutral continuous descent operations,” Transport. Res. C-Emer., vol. 85, pp. 334–347, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    N. Takeichi and D. Inami, “Arrival-time controllability of tailored arrival subjected to flight-path constraints,” J. Aircraft, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2021–2029, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    D. D. Smedt, J. Bronsvoort, and G. McDonald, “Controlled time of arrival feasibility analysis,” Proc. of 10th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar(ATM2013), Chicago, IL, USA, ATM Seminar, pp. 2035–2039, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    D. D. Smedt, J. Bronsvoort, and G. Mcdonald, “Model for longitudinal uncertainty during controlled time of arrival operations,” Proc. of 11th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2015), Lisbon, Portugal, ATM Seminar, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    S. Vilardaga and X. Prats, “Operating cost sensitivity to required time of arrival commands to ensure separation in optimal aircraft 4d trajectories,” Transport. Res. C-Emer., vol. 61, pp. 75–86, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    P. M. A. D. Jong, N. D. Gelder, R. P. M. Verhoeven, F. J. L. Bussink, R. Kohrs, M. M. V. Paassen, and M. Mulder, “Time and energy management during descent and approach: a batch-simulation study,” J. Aircraft, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 190–203, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    P. M. A. D. Jong, F. J. L. Bussink, R. P. M. Verhoeven, N. D. Gelder, M. M. V. Paassen, and M. Mulder, “Time and energy management during approach: a human-in-the-loop study,” J. Aircraft, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    T. Nikoleris and M. Hansen, “Queueing models for trajectory-based aircraft operations,” Transport. Sci., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 501–511, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    N. Takeichi, “Nominal flight time optimization for arrival time scheduling through estimation/resolution of delay accumulation,” Transport. Res. C-Emer., vol. 77, pp. 433–443, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    M. Liang, “An agent-based approach to automated merge 4d arrival trajectories in busy terminal maneuvering area,” Procedia Eng., vol. 99, pp. 233–243, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    H. S. Ahn, Y. Q. Chen, and K. L. Moore, “Iterative learning control: Brief survey and categorization,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1099–1121, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    Y. Wang, F. Gao, and F. J. Doyle III, “Survey on iterative learning control, repetitive control, and run-to-run control,” J. Process Control, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1589–1600, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    J.-X. Xu, “A survey on iterative learning control for nonlinear systems,” Int. J. Control, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1275–1294, 2011.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    D. S. Tong, D. H. Nguyen, and H. S. Ahn, “Iterative learning control for optimal multiple-point tracking,” Proc. of Decision and Control and European Control Conference, pp. 6025–6030, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    C. T. Freeman and Y. Tan, “Iterative learning control with mixed constraints for point-to-point tracking,” Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 3657–3662, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    Y. Chen, B. Chu, and C. T. Freeman, “Point-to-point iterative learning control with optimal tracking time allocation,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1685–1698, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    Z. Hou, Y. Wang, C. Yin, and T. Tang, “Terminal iterative learning control based station stop control of a train,” Int. J. Control, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1263–1274, 2011.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    S. Jin, Z. Hou, and R. Chi, “Optimal terminal iterative learning control for the automatic train stop system,” Asian J. Control, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1992–1999, 2015.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    B. Ko, J.-W. Park, and D. W. Kim, “A study on iterative learning control for vibration of stewart platform,” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 258–266, Feb 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    X. Zhu and J. Wang, “Double iterative compensation learning control for active training of upper limb rehabilitation robot,” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1312–1322, Jun 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    S.-K. Oh and J. M. Lee, “Iterative learning control integrated with model predictive control for real-time disturbance rejection of batch processes,” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 415–421, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    S.-K. Oh, B. J. Park, and J. M. Lee, “Point-to-point iterative learning model predictive control,” Automatica, vol. 89, pp. 135–143, 2018.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    J. K. Klooster and D. de. Smedt, “Controlled time of arrival spacing analysis,” Proc. of the 9th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2011), Berlin, Germany, ATM Seminar, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    A. Pawelek, R. Dalmau, P. Lichota, and X. Prats, “Assessment of arrival traffic synchronisation with required time of arrivals for fuel-efficient trajectories,” Proc. of the 17th ATIO-AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, U.S., AIAA, pp. 1–14, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    D. Wang, “Ground track counting method of the 4d guidance in terminal area,” Flight Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 27–33, 1996.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. [30]

    A. Franco and D. Rivas, “Analysis of optimal aircraft cruise with fixed arrival time including wind effects,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 212–222, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaoyang Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Niket Kaisare under the direction of Editor Jay H. Lee. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (61433002).

Gaoyang Jiang received his B.S. degree in Electronic Information Engineering from the PLA Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, China, in 2009, and an M.S. degree in Traffic Information Engineering and Control from the Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, China, in 2012. He is currently working toward a Ph.D. degree in Traffic Information Engineering and Control at Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China. His research interests include data-driven control, iterative learning control, and model predictive control.

Zhongsheng Hou received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in applied mathematics from Jilin University of Technology, Changchun, China, in 1983 and 1988, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in control theory from Northeastern University, Shenyang, China, in 1994. He was a Visiting Scholar at Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, from 2002 to 2003. In 1997, he joined the Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, where he is currently a Full Professor and Founding Director of the Advanced Control Systems Laboratory, and the Head of the Department of Automatic Control. His research interests are the data-driven control, model free adaptive control, learning control, and intelligent transportation systems. Up to now, he has over 150 peer-reviewed journal papers published and over 140 papers in prestigious conference proceedings. He authors two monographs “Nonparametric Model and its Adaptive Control Theory, Science Press, China, 1999” and “Model Free Adaptive Control: Theory and Applications, CRC Press, 2013”. He served as an associate editor and guest editor for a few international journals and Chinese journals. He is an IEEE senior member, a member of IFAC Technical Committee “Adaptive and Learning Systems”, and a member of IFAC Technical Committee “Transportation Systems”. He is the Founding Director of The Technical Committee on Data Driven Control, Learning and Optimization (DDCLO), Chinese Association of Automation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, G., Hou, Z. Iterative Learning Model Predictive Control Approaches for Trajectory Based Aircraft Operation with Controlled Time of Arrival. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18, 2641–2649 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0590-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Air traffic control
  • iterative learning control
  • model prediction control
  • trajectory based operation