Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive Neural Network Model-based Event-triggered Attitude Tracking Control for Spacecraft

  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the problem of attitude tracking control for spacecraft with limited communication, unknown system parameters, and external disturbances. An adaptive control scheme with an event-triggered mechanism (ETM) is proposed to alleviate the communication burden. Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) estimation model is developed to provide the input signals for the control module in this control scheme. Estimated attitude information of the spacecraft generated from the estimation model will only be transmitted to the control module at the instants when the ETM is violated. The neural network (NN) and the estimation model will be updated complying with an adaptive algorithm at the discrete triggering instants. It’s substantiated that all the errors of attitude tracking converge towards corresponding residuals and there are no accumulated triggering instants. Numerical simulation also demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed control method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. H. Tanaka, N. Yamamoto, T. Yairi, and K. Machida, “Reconfigurable cellular satellites maintained by space robots,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 356–364, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Barnhart, B. Sullivan, and R. Hunter, “Phoenix program status-2013,” Proc. of AIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition, 2013.

  3. J. Weise, K. Brieß, A. Andreé, H. G. Reimerdes, and M. Göller, “An intelligent building blocks concept for onorbit-satellite servicing,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (iSAIRAS), 2012.

  4. H. Chang, P. Huang, and Y. Zhang, “Distributed control allocation for spacecraft attitude takeover control via cellular space robot,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2499–2506, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Chang, P. Huang, and Y. Zhang, “Cellular space robot and its interactive model identification for spacecraft takeover control,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS), IEEE, 2016.

  6. W. Xu, D. Meng, and Y. Chen, “Dynamics modelling and analysis of a flexible-base space robot for capturing large flexible spacecraft,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 357–401, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Shan, J. Guo, and E. Gill, “Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 80, pp. 18–32, Jan. 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Ahmed, V. T. Coppola, and D. S. Bernstein, “Adaptive asymptotic tracking of spacecraft attitude motion with inertia matrix identification,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 684–691, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Wu, S. Song, and J. Sun, “Adaptive dynamic surface control for spacecraft terminal safe approach with input saturation based on tracking differentiator,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1129–1141, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Luo, Y. Chu, and K. Ling, “Inverse optimal adaptive control for attitude tracking of spacecraft,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1639–1654, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Bayat, “Model predictive sliding control for finite-time three-axis spacecraft attitude tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 7986–7996, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. D. Boskovic, S.-M. Li, and R. K. Mehra, “Robust adaptive variable structure control of spacecraft under control input saturation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. Hu, B. Xiao, D. Wang, and E. K. Poh, “Attitude control of spacecraft with actuator uncertainty,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1771–1776, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Chutiphon, “Output feedback second order sliding mode control for spacecraft attitude and translation motion,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 411–424, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Wu, D. Wang, and E. K. Poh, “High precision satellite attitude tracking control via iterative learning control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 528–534, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. N. Nair, D. Wang, and E. K. Poh, “Feedback control under data rate constraints: an overview,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 108–137, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Tatikonda and S. Mitter, “Control under communication constraints,” IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1056–1068, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Zhou, C. Wen, and G. Yang, “Adaptive backsteppting stabilization of nonlinear uncertain systems with quantized input signal,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 460–464, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Xie, Y. Kao, C. Zhang, and H. R. Karimi, “Quantized control for uncertain singular Markovian jump linear systems with general incomplete transition rates,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1107–1116, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Ma, Q. Zhou, L. Bai, and H. Liang, “Observer-based adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control for stochastic nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with input quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 287–298, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Tabuada, “Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1680–1685, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Lunze and D. Lehmann, “A state-feedback approach to event-based control,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 211–215, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Huang, F. Zhang, J. Cai, D. Wang, Z. Meng, and J. Guo, “Dexterous tethered space robot design, measurement, control and experiment,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1452–1468, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Liu, J. Fang, Z. Li, and G. He, “Formation control with multiple leaders via event-triggering transmission strategy,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1494–1506, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Tang and C. Li, “Distributed event-triggered containment control for discrete-time multi-agent systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2727–2732, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Sahoo, H. Xu, and S. Jagannathan, “Event-based neural network approxmation and control of uncertain nonlinear continuous-time systems,” Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 1567–1572, 2015.

  27. Y. Li and G. Yang, “Model-based adaptive event-triggered control of strict-feedback nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1033–1045, 2018.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Li and G. Yang, “Adaptive neural control of pure-feedback nonlinear systems with event-triggered communications,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6242–6251, 2018.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. X. Li, D. Ma, X. Hu, and Q. Sun, “Dynamic event-triggered control for heterogeneous leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems based on input-to-state stability,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 293–302, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. B. Wu, “Spacecraft attitude control with input quantization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 176–181, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. B. Wu and X. Cao, “Roubust attitude tracking control for spacecraft with quantized torques,” IEEE transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1020–1028, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H. Sun, L. Hou, G. Zong, and X. Yu, “Fixed-time attitude tracking control for spacecraft with input quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic systems, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 124–134, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Zhang, J. Wang, D. Zhang, and X. Shao, “Learning observer based and event-triggered control to spacecraft against actuator faults,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 522–530, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. B. Wu, Q. Shen, and X. Cao, “Event-triggered attitude control of spacecraft,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 927–934, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. L. Xing, C. Wen, Z. Liu, H. Su, and J. Cai, “An event-triggered design scheme for spacecraft attitude control,” Pro.co f 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2017.

  36. M. Lovera and A. Astolfi, “Spacecraft attitude control using magnetic actuators,” Automatica, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1405–1414, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. M. H. Stone, “The generalized Weierstrass approximation theorem,” Mathematics Magazine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 237–254, 1948.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. F. W. Lewis, S. Jagannathan, and A. Yesildirak, Neural Network Control of Robot Manipulators and Non-linear Systems, CRC press, 1998.

  39. L. Wang, “Stable adaptive fuzzy control of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Sarangapani, Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Discrete-time Systems, CRC press, 2006.

  41. S. Ge, C. Yang, S. Dai, Z. Jiao, and T. Lee, “Robust adaptive control of a class of nonlinear strict-feedback discrete-time systems with exact output tracking,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2537–2545, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Postoyan, P. Tabuada, D. Nesic, and A. Anta, “A framework for the event-triggered stabilization of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 982–996, 2015.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Ge, C. Yang, and T. Lee, “Adaptive predictive control using neural network for a class of pure-feedback systems in discrete time,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1599–1614, Sep. 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. W. Liu, Y. Geng, B. Wu, and D. Wang, “Neural-network-based adaptive event-triggered control for spacecraft attitude tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2951732

  45. C. Wang, L. Guo, C. Wen, Q. Hu and J. Qiao, “Event-triggered adaptive attitude tracking control for spacecraft with unknown actuator faults,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 2241–2250, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baolin Wu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Choon Ki Ahn under the direction of Editor Chan Gook Park. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61873312

Hongyi Xie received his B.Eng. degree in 2018 in the major of flight vehicle design and engineering from the Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, where he is currently pursuing a degree of master with the Research Center of Satellite Technology. His research interests are spacecraft attitude control and on-orbit services.

Baolin Wu received his B.Eng. and M.Eng. degrees in spacecraft design from the Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, in 2003 and 2005, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in spacecraft formation control from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in 2011. From 2011 to 2013, he spent two years in the satellite research and development industry in ST Electronics (Satellite Systems) Pte Ltd., Singapore. He developed algorithms for satellite attitude determination and control system. He joined in Research Center of Satellite Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology in 2014. He is currently a full professor. His current research area is in spacecraft attitude control, attitude synchronization, spacecraft formation control, and trajectory optimization.

Weixing Liu received his B.Eng. and M.Eng. degrees in spacecraft design from the Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, in 2015 and 2017, respectively, where he is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree with the Research Center of Satellite Technology. His research interests are spacecraft attitude control and on-orbit services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, H., Wu, B. & Liu, W. Adaptive Neural Network Model-based Event-triggered Attitude Tracking Control for Spacecraft. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 19, 172–185 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0487-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0487-5

Keywords

Navigation