Skip to main content
Log in

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Applied to High-order Systems with Parametric Uncertainties

  • Regular Papers
  • Control Theory and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) is an emerging control technique known for its simplicity and good disturbance rejection ability. It has been applied to first- and second-order systems in many areas. However, the application of the ADRC to high-order systems is few and also challenging because the existing bandwidth tuning method is unable to determine proper controller parameters to achieve desired system performance. To address this problem, a new method is proposed to tune the ADRC for controlling high-order systems. First, the ADRC is decomposed into a controller and a prefilter in the frequency domain. Second, they are tuned to satisfy prescribed performance specifications. Two applications of the ADRC to high-order hydraulic systems are presented. It is shown that the proposed method greatly improves the performance of the ADRC compared to the bandwidth tuning method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Han, “Auto-disturbance rejection control and it applications,” Control and Decision (in Chinese), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 1998.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Han, “From PID to active disturbance rejection control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 900–906, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Gao, “Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 4989–4996, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Gao, “Active disturbance rejection control: a paradigm shift in feedback control system design,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 2399–2405, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Zheng, L. Dong, D. H. Lee, and Z. Gao, “Active disturbance rejection control for MEMS gyroscopes,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1432–1438, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Chu, Y. Sun, C. Wu, and N. Sepehri, “Active disturbance rejection control applied to automated steering for lane keeping in autonomous vehicles,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 74, pp. 13–21, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. M. Belmonte, R. Morales, A. Fernandez-Caballero, and J. A. Somolinos, “A tandem active disturbance rejection control for a laboratory helicopter with variable-speed rotors,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 6395–6406, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Lotfi, H. Zomorodi, and R. G. Landers, “Active disturbance rejection control for voltage stabilization in open-cathode fuel cells through temperature regulation,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 56, pp. 92–100, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Du, S. Wu, S. Han, and S. Cui, “Application of linear active disturbance rejection controller for sensorless control of internal permanent-magnet synchronous motor,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 3019–3027, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Yang, Y. Yu, J. Qiu, and C. Hua, “Active disturbance rejection tracking control for a nonlinear pneumatic muscle system,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2376–2384, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Xia, F. Pu, S. Li, and Y. Gao, “Lateral path tracking control of autonomous land vehicle based on ADRC and differential flatness,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 3091–3099, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Rodriguez-Angeles and J. A. Garcia-Antonio, “Active disturbance rejection control in steering by wire haptic systems,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 939–946, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. Zheng, Z. Chen, and Z. Gao, “A practical approach to disturbance decoupling control,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1016–1025, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. A. Castaneda, A. Luviano-Juarez, and I. Chairez, “Robust trajectory tracking of a Delta robot through adaptive active disturbance rejection control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1387–1398, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Zhao and Z. Gao, “Modified active disturbance rejection control for time-delay systems,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 882–888, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Q. Zheng and Z. Gao, “Predictive active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 873–881, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Erenturk, “Fractional-order PID and active disturbance rejection control of nonlinear two-mass drive system,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 3806–3813, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Li, M. Sun, Z. Wang, and Z. Chen, “Quantitative analysis of critical limitation in using extended state observer,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 876–882, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Huang, E. Canuto, and C. Novara, “The four-tank control problem: comparison of two disturbance rejection control solutions,” ISA Transactions, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 252–271, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Feng and B. Guo, “Active disturbance rejection control: old and new results,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 44, pp. 238–248, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Fu and W. Tan, “Tuning of linear ADRC with known plant information,” ISA Transactions, vol. 65, pp. 384–393, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Tan and C. Fu, “Linear active disturbance-rejection control: analysis and tuning via IMC,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 2350–2359, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Tian and Z. Gao, “Frequency response analysis of active disturbance rejection based control system,” Proceedings of 16th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 1595–1599, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Dong, P. Kandula and Z. Gao, “On a robust control system design for an electric power assist steering system,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 5356–5361, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Yaniv, Quantitative Feedback Design of Linear and Nonlinear Control Systems, Kluwer, USA, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Ren, M. Esfandiari, J. Song, and N. Sepehri, “Position control of an electrohydrostatic actuator with tolerance to internal leakage,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 2224–2232, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. D. Landau, T. Airimitoaie, A. Castellanos-Silva, and A. Constantinescu, Adaptive and Robust Active Vibration Control, Springer, Switzerland, 2017.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Karpenko and N. Sepehri, “Fault-tolerant control of a servohydraulic positioning system with crossport leakage,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 155–161, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nariman Sepehri.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Jiuxiang Dong under the direction of Editor Guang-Hong Yang. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.

Zhengrong Chu received his B.Sc. from the Central South University, an M.Sc. from the Harbin Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. from the University of Manitoba. His research interests include advanced controls of autonomous vehicles, industrial robots, and hydraulic actuators.

Christine Wu received her B.Sc. from the Peking University, an M.Sc. from the University of British Columbia, and a Ph.D. from the University of Manitoba. Her research interests include nonlinear dynamics, legged locomotion robotics, and biomechanics.

Nariman Sepehri received the M.Sc. and Ph.D. from the University of British Columbia. His research interests include teleoperation and robotics, control systems, systems modelling and identification, and actuators and fluid power.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, Z., Wu, C. & Sepehri, N. Active Disturbance Rejection Control Applied to High-order Systems with Parametric Uncertainties. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 17, 1483–1493 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-0509-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-0509-8

Keywords

Navigation