Advertisement

Enhanced Robust Motion Tracking Control for 6 Degree-of-freedom Industrial Assembly Robot with Disturbance Adaption

  • Li Pan
  • Tao Gao
  • Fang Xu
  • Libin Zhang
Regular Paper Robot and Applications
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Industrial assembly robots are designed to enable accurate and repeatable tracking of the positions and orientations of the robot’s end-effector and are hence often required to perform complex tasks within uncertain environments. Therefore, trajectory tracking control is vital to the wide range of applications of industrial robotic systems. This paper presents an enhanced robust motion tracking controller with disturbance adaption for trajectory tracking control of industrial assembly robot. The dynamics of the industrial assembly robotic system is formulated in the working space of the end-effector and the tracking control problem is then formulated. The enhanced robust motion tracking control is synthesized by using disturbance adaption and modified iterative control terms, which is a refined version of conventional robust adaptive control with only disturbance rejection. The capability and effectiveness of the enhanced robust motion tracking control have been evaluated based on an industrial robotic platform. The comparative results clearly show that the proposed control can be used to better minimize the trajectory tracking errors in finite time as compared with conventional proportional derivative control.

Keywords

Comparative results disturbance adaption industrial assembly robot iterative control trajectory tracking control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. J. Todd, Fundamentals of Robot Technology: An Introduction to Industrial Robots, Teleoperators and Robot Vehicle, Springer Science & Business Media, May 2012.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Hägele, K. Nilsson, J. N. Pires, and R. Bischoff, “Industrial robotics,” Springer handbook of robotics, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1385–1422, August 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Johansson, “Sensor integration in task-level programming and industrial robotic task execution control,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 284–296, March 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. H. Hsu and L. C. Fu, “Adaptive decentralized control of robot manipulators driven by current-fed induction motors,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 465–468, August 2005. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Z. J. Yang, Y. Fukushima, and P. Qin, “Decentralized adaptive robust control of robot manipulators using disturbance observers,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1357–1365, May 2012. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Yang, “Discrete-time optimal adaptive RBFNN control for robot manipulators with uncertain dynamics,” Neurocomputing, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2812–2819, Nov. 2016.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. M. Fateh, S. M. Ahmadi, and S. Khorashadizade, “Adaptive RBF network control for robot manipulators,” J. AI Data Min, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 159–166, March 2014.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. H. Zhang, X. P. Ye, L. H. Jiang, and Y. M. Fang, “Robust control for robotic manipulators based on adaptive neural network,” Open Mech. Eng. J., vol. 8, pp. 497–502, May 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    N. Mendes and P. Neto, “Indirect adaptive fuzzy control for industrial robots: a solution for contact applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 1, no. 42, pp. 8929–35, Dec. 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Z. Bingül and O. Karahan, “A fuzzy logic controller tuned with PSO for 2 DOF robot trajectory control,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 31, no. 38, pp. 1017–31, May 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    N. Nikdel, M. A. Badamchizadeh, V. Azimirad, and M. A. Nazari, “Adaptive backstepping control for an n-degree of freedom robotic manipulator based on combined state augmentation,” Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, vol. 30, no. 44, 129-43. [click]Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. He, Y. Chen, and Z. Yin, “Adaptive neural network control of an uncertain robot with full-state constraints,” IEEE Trans. Cybern, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 620–629, May 2016. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    W. He, Y. Dong, and C. Sun, “Adaptive neural impedance control of a robotic manipulator with input saturation,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 334–344, June 2016. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. He, A. O. David, Z. Yin, and C. Sun, “Neural network control of a robotic manipulator with input deadzone and output constraint,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 759–770, July 2016. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Homayounzade and M. Keshmiri, “Noncertainty equivalent adaptive control of robot manipulators without velocity measurements,” Adv. Robot, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 983–996, March 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Huang, C. Wen, W. Wang, and Z. P. Jiang, “Adaptive output feedback tracking control of a nonholonomic mobile robot,” Automatica, vol. 31, no. 50, pp. 821–831, March 2014. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Y. Wang, T. Mai, and J. Mao, “Adaptive motion/force control strategy for non-holonomic mobile manipulator robot using recurrent fuzzy wavelet neural networks,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 34, pp. 137–53, March 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    X. Wang, X. Li, J. Wang, X. Fang, and X. Zhu, “Datadriven model-free adaptive sliding mode control for the multi degree-of-freedom robotic exoskeleton,” Information Sciences, vol. 10, no. 327, pp. 246–57, August 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Vijay and D. Jena, “PSO based neuro fuzzy sliding mode control for a robot manipulator,” Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp 243–256, May 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. M. Murray, A Mathematical Introduction To Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press, 1994.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2005 3.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    B. Siciliano, L. Sciavicco, L. Villani, and G. Oriolo, Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control, Springer Science & Business Media, Aug. 2010.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    B. Yao, F. Bu, J. Reedy, and G. Chiu, “Adaptive robust control of single rod hydraulic actuators: theory and experiments,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–91, Mar. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    B. Yao and L. Xu, “Adaptive robust control of linear motors for precision manufacturing,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 595–616, May 2002. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Hou, G. Duan, and M. Guo, “New versions of Barbalat’s lemma with applications,” Journal of Control Theory and Applications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 545–547, Nov. 2010. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    D. Meng and K. L. Moore, “Robust iterative learning control for nonrepetitive uncertain systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 907–913, June 2017. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of E&M, Zhejiang University of TechnologyMinistry of Education & Zhejiang ProvinceZhejiang HangzhouChina
  2. 2.China United Engineering CompanyZhejiang HangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations