Advertisement

Community-based informed agents selection for flocking with a virtual leader

  • Nuwan Ganganath
  • Chi-Tsun Cheng
  • Xiaofan Wang
  • Chi K. Tse
Regular Papers Robot and Applications

Abstract

It has been studied that a few informed individuals in a group of interacting dynamic agents can influence the majority to follow the position and velocity of a virtual leader. Previously it has been shown that a cluster-based selection of informed agents can drive more agents to follow the virtual leader compared to a random selection. However, a practical question is: How many informed agents to select? In order to address this, here we propose a novel method for selecting informed agents based on community structures in the initial spatial distribution of agents. The number of informed agents are decided based on the strongest community structure. We test and analyze the performance of the proposed method against random and cluster-based selections of informed agents using extensive computer simulations. Results of our study show that community-based selection can be useful in deciding an optimum number of informed agents such that a majority of the group can achieve their common objective.

Keywords

Communities controllability flocking informed agents virtual leader 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Cortés-Avizanda, R. Jovani, J. A. Donázar, and V. Grimm, “Bird sky networks: How do avian scavengers use social information to find carrion?” Ecology, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1799–1808, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Marras, S. S. Killen, J. Lindström, D. J. McKenzie, J. F. Steffensen, and P. Domenici, “Fish swimming in schools save energy regardless of their spatial position,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    I. D. Couzin, J. Krause, N. R. Franks, and S. A. Levin, “Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move,” Nature, vol. 433, no. 7025, pp. 513–516, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Deng, L. de Vargas Roditi, D. van Ditmarsch, and J. B. Xavier, “The ecological basis of morphogenesis: branching patterns in swarming colonies of bacteria,” New journal of physics, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 015006, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. W. Reynolds, “Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model,” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 25–34, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Wang, H. Zhao, Y. Bi, X. Chen, R. Zeng, Y. Wang, and L. Ha, “An improved fast flocking algorithm with obstacle avoidance for multiagent dynamic systems,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2014, 2014.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Li, W. Zhang, H. Su, and Y. Yang, “Flocking of partiallyinformed multi-agent systems avoiding obstacles with arbitrary shape,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 943–972, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    T. O. Crist, D. S. Guertin, J. A. Wiens, and B. T. Milne, “Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes: an experiment with eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie,” Functional Ecology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 536–544, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    X.-K. Xu, M. Small, and Pérez-Barbería, “Uncovering interaction patterns of multi-agent collective motion via complex network analysis,” Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 2213–2216, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M.-J. Park, O.-M. Kwon, J. H. Park, S.-M. Lee, and E.-J. Cha, “A new analysis on leader-following consensus for switched multi-agent systems with time-varying probabilistic self-delays,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems (IJCAS), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 611–619, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. Jia and W. Zhang, “Distributed adaptive flocking of robotic fish system with a leader of bounded unknown input,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems (IJCAS), vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1049–1058, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Su, X. Wang, and Z. Lin, “Flocking of multi-agents with a virtual leader,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 293–307, 2009.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Luo and C. Cao, “Consensus in multi-agent systems with nonlinear uncertainties under a fixed undirected graph,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 231–240, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Z. Wu, L. Peng, L. Xie, and J. Wen, “Stochastic bounded consensus tracking of second-order multi-agent systems with measurement noises based on sampled-data with small sampling delay,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    N. E. Leonard and E. Fiorelli, “Virtual leaders, artificial potentials and coordinated control of groups,” Proc. of 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 3. IEEE, 2001, pp. 2968–2973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. Olfati-Saber, “Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: Algorithms and theory,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 401–420, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    W. Ren, “Multi-vehicle consensus with a time-varying reference state,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 474–483, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    F. Chen, Z. Chen, L. Xiang, Z. Liu, and Z. Yuan, “Reaching a consensus via pinning control,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1215–1220, 2009.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. Ganganath, C.-T. Cheng, C. K. Tse, and X. Wang, “Cluster-based informed agents selection for flocking with a virtual leader,” in International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Lancichinetti and S. Fortunato, “Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis,” Physical Review E, vol. 80, no. 5, p. 056117, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H.-W. Shen, Community Structure of Complex Networks, Springer, 2013.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    N. Ganganath, G. Chen, and C.-T. Cheng, “Detecting hierarchical and overlapping community structures in networks,” Proc. of International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications (NOLTA). IEICE, 2014, pp. 345–348.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. E. Newman and M. Girvan, “Finding and evaluating community structure in networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 2, p. 026113, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. E. Newman, “Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 6, p. 066133, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuwan Ganganath
    • 1
  • Chi-Tsun Cheng
    • 1
  • Xiaofan Wang
    • 2
  • Chi K. Tse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronic and Information Engineeringthe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of AutomationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations