Advertisement

Design of feedback control for quadrotors considering signal transmission delays

  • Stephen K. Armah
  • Sun Yi
  • Wonchang Choi
Regular Papers Control Theory and Applications

Abstract

For quadrotor types of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), existence of transmission delays caused by wireless communication is one of the critical challenges. Estimation of the delays and analysis of their effects are not straightforward for designing controllers. An estimation method is introduced using experimental data and analytical solutions of delay differential equations (DDEs). Collected altitude responses in the time domain are compared to the predicted ones obtained from the analytical solutions. The Lambert W function-based approach for first-order DDEs is used for such analysis. The dominant characteristic roots among infinite number of roots are obtained in terms of coefficients and the delay. The effects of the time delay on the responses are analysed through the locations of the characteristic roots in the complex plane. Based on the estimation result, proportional plus velocity controllers are proposed to improve transient altitude responses.

Keywords

Delay differential equation delay estimation Lambert W function quadrotor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Azadegan, M.T. Beheshti, and B. Tavassoli, “Using AQM for performance improvement of networked control systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 764–772, 2015.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Kchaou, F. Tadeo, M. Chaabane, and A. Toumi, “Delaydependent robust observer-based control for discrete-time uncertain singular systems with interval time-varying state delay,” Int. J. Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12–22, February 2014. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Yi, W. Choi, and T. Abu-Lebdeh, “Time-delay estimation using the characteristic roots of delay differential equations,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 955–960, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Belkoura, J.P. Richard, and M. Fliess, “Parameters estimation of systems with delayed and structured entries,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1117–1125, 2009. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. P. Richard, “Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems,” Automatica, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1667–1694, 2003. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Vásárhelyi, C. Virágh, G. Somorjai, N. Tarcai, T. Szorenyi, T. Nepusz, and Vicsek, T. “Outdoor flocking and formation flight with autonomous aerial robots,” Proc. of the 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), pp. 3866–3873, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Ailon and S. Arogeti, “Study on the effects of timedelays on quadrotor-type helicopter dynamics,” Proc. of the 22nd Mediterranean Conference of Control and Automation (MED), pp. 305–310, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Torkamani and E.A. Butcher, “Delay, state, and parameter estimation in chaotic and hyperchaotic delayed systems with uncertainty and time-varying delay,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 135–163, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Mamat and P. J. Fleming, “Method for on-line identification of a first order plus dead-time process model,” Electronics Letters, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 1297–1298, 1995. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. P. Rangaiah and P. R. Krishnaswamy, “Estimating second-order dead time parameters from underdamped process transients,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1149–1155, 1996. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Ahmed, B. Huang, and S. L. Shah, “Parameter and delay estimation of continuous-time models using a linear filter,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 323–331, 2006. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    G.-W. Shin, Y.-J. Song, T.-B. Lee, and H.-K. Choi, “Genetic algorithm for identification of time delay systems from step responses,” Int. J. Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    G. P. Rao and L. Sivakumar, “Identification of deterministic time-lag systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 527–529, 1976. [click]CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. C. Saha and G. P. Rao, Identification of Continuous Dynamical Systems: the Poisson moment Functional (PMF) Approach, vol. 56, Springer, 1983.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Pintelon and L. Van Biesen, “Identification of transfer functions with time delay and its application to cable fault location,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 479–484, 1990. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Q.-G. Wang and Y. Zhang, “Robust identification of continuous systems with dead-time from step responses,” Automatica, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 377–390, 2001. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Sagara and Z. Y. Zhao, “Numerical integration approach to on-line identification of continuous-time systems,” Automatica, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Armah and S. Yi, “Altitude regulation of quadrotor types of UAVs considering communication delays,” Proc. of the IFACWorkshop on Time Delay Systems, pp. 263–268, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    W. B. Randal, “Quadrotor dynamics and control Rev 0.1,” All Faculty Publications, Paper 1325 from http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/1325, 2008.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Corke, Robotics, Vision and Control: Fundamental Algorithms in MATLAB, vol. 73, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. H. Tanveer, S. F. Ahmed, D. Hazry, F. A. Warsi, and M. K. Joyo, “Stabilized controller design for attitude and altitude controlling of quad-rotor under disturbance and noisy conditions,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 819–831, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    B. Svante and L. Ljung, “A survey and comparison of timedelay estimation methods in linear systems,” Proc. of the 42nd IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 2502–2507, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, “On the Lambert W function,” Advances in Computational Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 329–359, 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Shinozaki and T. Mori, “Robust stability analysis of linear time-delay systems by Lambert W function: some extreme point results,” Automatica, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1791–1799, 2006. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    W. J. Palm, System dynamics, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2010.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    S. K. Armah, Adaptive Control for Autonomous Navigation of Mobile Robots Considering Time Delay and Uncertainty, Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina A&T State University, 2015.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    T. Vyhlídal and Z. Pavel, “QPmR-quasi-polynomial rootfinder: algorithm update and examples,” Delay Systems, pp. 299–312, Springer International Publishing, 2014. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Mathworks, Choosing a Solver, from http://www.mathworks.com/help/optim/ug/choosing-a-solver.html, 2015.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    L. F. Shampine, “Error estimation and control for ODEs,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 25 no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2005. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering in North Carolina A & T State UniversityGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Architectural Engineering in Gachon UniversityGyeonggi-doKorea

Personalised recommendations