Skip to main content
Log in

Projected predictive Energy-Bounding Approach for multiple degree-of-freedom haptic teleoperation

  • Regular Papers
  • Robot and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a geometrically and dynamically transparent projected predictive Energy-Bounding Approach (EBA) for multiple degree-of-freedom (m-DOF) haptic teleoperation with time delays. The straightforward extension of a single-DOF teleoperation to m-DOF teleoperation suffers from a bad force distortion problem that becomes worse with the increase in communication time delays between master and slave sites. Due to this, geometry perception of remote m-DOF objects at master site is severely deteriorated. To solve this problem, a projected predictive m-DOF EBA is proposed by combining the m-DOF Predictive EBA and the projection method that can compensate the force distortion problem. The proposed approach also includes steps to get stably the information about the contact locations (geometry) of m-DOF remote objects without geometry detection sensors. In order to validate the proposed approach, some experiments performing surface contour-following are conducted using two Phantoms: (i) 2-DOF object (bobbin), and (ii) 3-DOF semi-spherical object in the presence of large time delays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

F h :

Human operator applied force

F e :

Environment reaction force

F m :

Force input to the master device

F s :

Force input to the slave device

F mc :

Force from master controller

F sc :

Force from slave controller

F mEBA :

Force from master EBA

F pmEBA :

Force from predictive EBA

F md :

Delayed force feedback at master from slave side

F p :

Force obtained from predictor (SP loop)

x h :

Human operator position

x e :

Environment position

x m :

Master device position

x s :

Slave device position

e s :

Position error between x s and x sd

T 1 :

Forward time delay from master to slave side

T 2 :

Backward time delay from slave to master side

T :

Round trip time delay (RTT)

x sd :

Delayed master position at slave side

K e :

Environment Stiffness

i :

Orthogonal coordinate axis

K p & K d :

Proportional & Derivative (PD) controller gains

C m :

Low level master controller

C s :

Low level slave controller

EBA :

Energy-Bounding Algorithm

EBA m :

High level master controller based on EBA

EBA s :

High level slave controller based on EBA

β pm & γ pm :

Stably displayed stiffnesses of EBA m

max:

Subscript representing maximum value

min:

Subscript representing minimum value

C mr :

Combination of C m & EBA m

C sr :

Combination of C s & EBA s

c 1 :

Physical energy dissipation capability of device

c 2 :

Tuning parameter of EBA

G m :

Master device dynamics

G s :

Slave device dynamics

G p :

Plant dynamics (Slave + Environment dynamics)

Z e :

Environment Impedance

τ :

Sampling time

\(ZOH = \frac{{1 - {e^{ - s\tau }}}}{s}\) :

Zero-Order-Hold

single-DOF :

Single Degree-of-Freedom

m-DOF :

Multiple Degree-of-Freedom

WV :

Wave Variable

WP :

Wave Predictor

LQG :

Linear Quadratic Gaussian

SMC :

Sliding Mode Controller

MMT :

Model-Mediated Telemanipulation

MBP :

Model-Based Predictor

SP :

Smith Predictor

References

  1. P. F. Hokayem, and M. W. Spong, “Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey,” Automatica, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2035–2057, 2006. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. T. B. Sheridan, “Teleoperation, telerobotics and telepresence: A progress report,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 205–214, 1995. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Kim, W. K, Chung, and M. C. Cavusoglu, “Description of instantaneous restriction space for multi-dofs bilateral teleoperation systems using position sensors in unstructured environments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1150–1158, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. G. Griffiths and A. M. Okamura, “Defining performance tradeoffs for multi-degree-of-freedom bilateral teleoperators with LQG control,” Proc. of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 3542–3547, Dec. 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Kim, J. P. Kim, C. Seo, and J. Ryu, “A directionally transparent energy bounding approach for multiple degreeof-freedom haptic interaction,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 352–360, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Willaert, J. Bohg, H. V. Brussel, and G. Niemeyer, “Towards multi-DOF model mediated teleoperation: using vision to augment feedback,” Proc. of IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and Games (HAVE), pp. 25–31, Oct. 8-9, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Lee, and J. Kim, “Transparency analysis and delay compensation scheme for haptic-based networked virtual environments,” Computer Communications, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 992–999, 2009. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Seo, J. P. Kim, J. Kim, H. S. Ahn, and J. Ryu., “Robustly stable bilateral teleoperation under time-varying delays and data losses: An energy-bounding approach,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 2089–2100, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. I. C. Dede, S. Tosunoglu, and D. W. Repperger, “A study on multiple degree-of-freedom force reflecting teleoperation with constant and variable time delays,” ASME Southeastern Region XI Technical Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3.1-3.8, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Alise, R.G. Roberts, D.W. Repperger, C.A. Moore and S. Tosunoglu, “On extending the wave variable method to multiple-dof teleoperation systems,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Lawrence, “Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 624–637, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Yang, H. Li, Y. Chen, and J. Yi, “Model predictive control for space teleoperation systems based on a mixed-H 2/H approach,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, pp. 04014133(1-9), 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Li, M. Tavakoli, and Q. Huang, “3-DOF trilateral teleoperation using a pair of 1-DOF and 2-DOF haptic devices: stability analysis,” Intelligent Control and Automation Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 443–448, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Munir and W. J. Book, “Wave-based teleoperation with prediction,” Proc. of the American Control Conference, pp. 4605–4611, Jun. 2001. [click]

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Munir and W. J. Book, “Internet-based teleoperation using wave variables with prediction,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 124–133, 2002. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Daly and D. W. L. Wang, “Time-delayed bilateral teleoperation with force estimation for n-dof nonlinear robot manipulators,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3911–3918, Oct. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. Lee and M.W. Spong, “Passive bilateral teleoperation with constant time delay,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 269–281, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. V. Velanas and C. S. Tzafestas, “Model-mediated telehaptic perception of delayed curvature,” IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 941–947, Sept. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Ching and W. J. Book, “Internet-based bilateral teleoperation based on wave variable with adaptive predictor and direct drift control,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2006. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. C. Smith and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, “Smith predictor type control architectures for time delayed teleoperation,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 797–818, 2006. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Sirouspour and A. Shahdi, “Model predictive control for transparent teleoperation under communication time delay,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1131–1145, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. J. Pan, C. Canudas-de-Wit, and O. Sename, “A new predictive approach for bilateral teleoperation with applications to drive-by-wire systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1146–1162, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Uddin, S. Park, and J. Ryu, “A predictive energybounding approach for haptic teleoperation,” Mechatronics, vol. 35, pp. 148–161, 2016. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Mirfakhrai and S. Payandeh, “A delay prediction approach for teleoperation over the internet,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 2178–2183, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Fraisse and A. Leleve, “Teleoperation over IP network: network delay regulation and adaptive control,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 225–235, 2003. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Mobasser and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, “Predictive teleoperation using laser rangefinder,” Proc. of Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp. 1279–1282, May. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. Mobasser and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, “Stable impedance reflecting teleoperation with online collision prediction,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 476–482, Oct. 29 -Nov. 2, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Uddin, S. Park, S. Y. Baek, and J. Ryu, “Model predictive energy-bounding approach for the perception of multiple degree-of-freedom objects in bilateral teleoperation with online geometry and parameter of remote environment: a feasibility test,” Proc. of 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), pp. 1039–1041, Oct. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Petitjean and E. Boyer, “Regular and non-regular point sets: properties and reconstruction,” Computational Geometry, vol. 19, no. 2–3, pp. 101–126, 2001. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Boyer and S. Petitjean, “Curve and surface reconstruction from regular and non-regular point sets,” Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 659–665, Jun. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. Hogan, “Controlling impedance at the man/machine interface,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1626–1631, May. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. P. Kim and J. Ryu, “Robustly stable haptic interaction control using an energy-bounding algorithm,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 666–679, 2010. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. W. S. Kim, “Developments of new force reflecting control schemes and an application to a teleoperation training simulator,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1412–1419, May. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Park, C. Seo, J. P. Kim, and J. Ryu., “Robustly stable rate-mode bilateral teleoperation using an energybounding approach,” Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 176–184, 2011. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeha Ryu.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Hongbo Li under the direction of Editor Fuchun Sun. This journal was supported by the Industrial fusion strategic technology development program funded by the Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (MI, Korea) (10049003).

Riaz Uddin received his B.E. and M.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Department of Electrical Engineering at NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan, in 2005 and 2008, respectively. He recently received his Ph.D. degree from the School of Mechatronics, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Korea, in 2016. He joined NED as a lecturer in 2005 and now he is working as an assistant professor in the department of Electrical Engineering in NED University of Engineering and Technology. His research interests include haptics, robotics, control systems, automation, and teleoperation.

Sangsoo Park received his B.S. degree from the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea, in 2009. He is currently working toward a Ph.D. degree at the Department of Medical System Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Korea. His research interests include haptics, robotics, and teleoperation.

Sungjun Park received his B.S. and M.S degrees from the Department of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering at Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea, and the Department of Mechatronics, Gwnagju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) Gwangju, Korea, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. He is currently working toward a Ph.D. degree at the Department of Mechatronics, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Korea. His research interests teleoperation and robotics.

Jeha Ryu received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Seoul, Korea and the University of Iowa, USA, in 1982, 1984, and 1991, respectively, all in Mechanical Engineering. He is currently a professor in the School of Mechatronics, GIST. Prof. Ryu is a member of IEEE, ASME, KSME, KSAE. More than 250 research articles and reports have been published and presented by him. His research interests include haptic interaction control, haptic modeling and rendering, haptic application for various multimedia systems and teleoperation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uddin, R., Park, S., Park, S. et al. Projected predictive Energy-Bounding Approach for multiple degree-of-freedom haptic teleoperation. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 14, 1561–1571 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0465-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0465-x

Keywords

Navigation