Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive wavenet controller design for teleoperation systems with variable time delays using singular perturbation method

  • Regular Paper
  • Robotics and Automation
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of controller design in teleoperation systems is to achieve stability and optimal operation in presence of factors such as time delays, system disturbances and modeling errors. This paper proposes a new method of controller design based on wavenet with singular perturbation method for the bilateral teleoperation of robots through the internet. The wavenet controller could overcome the variable time delay in teleoperation system. This new method introduces a reduced-order structure for control and stability of teleoperation systems. By using singular perturbation method, teleoperation system is decomposed into two fast and slow subsystems. This method is a step towards reduced-order modeling. In this method, we use a feedback linearization method in master subsystem and a wavenet controller for slave subsystem. In wavenet controller, we used a learning method so that the system was Lyapunov stable. As the stability of the model is highly dependent on the learning of the system, we use Lyapunov stability in this method. It has been tried to reduce the tracking error between the master and the slave subsystems. In this structure the position of master-slave are compared together and controlling signal is applied to the slave so that they can track each other in the least possible time. In all schemes the effectiveness of the system is shown through the simulations and they have been compared with each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. A. Lawrence, “Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics & Automation, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 624–637, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Ferrel, “Remote manipulator with transmission delay,” IEEE Trans. Human Factors in Electronics, vol. HF E-6, pp. 24–32, September 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Vertut, A. Micaelli, and P. Marchal, “Short transmission delay on a force reflective bilateral manipulator,” Proc. of the 4th Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robotics and Manipulation, pp. 269–275, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Hannaford, “A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 426–434, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Q. Huang and F. L. Lewis, “Neural network predictive control for nonlinear dynamic systems with time-delay,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 377–389, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Anderson and M. W. Spong, “Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 494–501, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Stramigioli, A. van der Schaft, B. Moschke, and C. Melchiorri, “Geometric scattering in robotic telemanipulation,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, vol. 18 no. 4, pp. 588–596, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Lin, F. Wallner, and R. Dillmann, “An advanced telerobotic control system for a mobile robot with multisensor feedback,” Proc. of the Intelligent Autonomous System (IAS-4), pp. 365–372, March 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Setoodeh, S. Sirouspour, and A. Shahdi, “Discrete-time multi-model control for cooperative teleoperation under time delay,” Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2921–2926, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Secchi, S. Stramigioli, and C. Fantuzzi, “Variable delay in Scaled-Port-Hamiltonian telemanipulation,” Elsevier Science Ltd, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 357–363, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Bolot, A. Shankar, and B. Plateu, “Performance analysis of transport protocol over congestive channels,” Journal on Performance Evaluation, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45–65, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. C. Bolot, “End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the Internet,” Proc. of SIGCOMM’93, pp. 289–298, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Elhajj, N. Xi, W. Fung, Y. Liu, Y. Hasegawa, and T. Fukuda, “Supermedia-enhanced internet-based telerobotics,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 3 pp. 396–421, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. Wai, R. Y. Duan, J. D. Lee, and H. Chang, “Wavelet neural network control for induction motor drive using sliding mode design technique,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 733–748, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Talaq and F. Al-Basiri, “Adaptive fuzzy gain scheduling for load frequency control,” IEEE Trans. Power System, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 154–150, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. F. Hsu, C. M. Lin, and T. T. Lee, “Wavelet adaptive backstepping control for a class of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Trans. Neural Network, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1175–1183, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. K. Lin, “Adaptive tracking controller design for robotic systems using Gaussian wavelet networks,” IEE proc. Control Theory App, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 316–322, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. D. Sousa, E. M. Hemerly, and R. K. H. Galvao, “Adaptive control for mobile robot using wavelet networks,” IEEE Trans. System Man Cyber. vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 493–504, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. R. Sanner and J. J. E. Slotine, “Structurally dynamic wavelet networks for adaptive control of robotic systems,” Int. J. Control, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 405–421, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Daubechies, “Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets,” Comm. Pur. Appl. Math, vol. 41, pp. 909–996, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. F. J. Lin, R. J. Wai, and M. P. Chen, “Wavelet neural network control for linear ultrasonic motor drive via adaptive sliding-mode technique,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason, Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 686–698, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Hosseini-Suny, H. Momeni, and F. Janabisharifi, “A modified adaptive controller design for teleoperation systems,” International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 676–683, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ryu, J.-B. Song, C. Cho, S. Kang, and M. Kim, “Development of a six DOF haptic master for teleoperation of a mobile manipulator,” International Journal of Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. B. Sheridan, Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control, The MIT Press, Cambrige, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Taylor and J. Trevelyan, “Australia’s telerobot on the web,” Proc. of International Symposium on Industrial Robots, pp. 39–44, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Goldberg, S. Gentner, C. Sutter, and J. Wiegley, “The mercury project: a feasibility study for Internet robots,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R. C. Lou and T. M. Chen, “Development of a multi-behavior based mobile robot for remote supervisory control through the Internet,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 5, pp. 376–385, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Goldberg and R. Siegwart, An Introduction to Online Robots, The MIT press, London, England, pp. 193–213, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Simmons, J. L. Fernandez, R. Goodwin, S. Koenig, and J. O’Sullivan, “Lessons learned from Xavier,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 33–39, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. V. Mut, J. Postigo, E. Slawinski, and B. Kuchen, “Bilateral teleoperation of mobile robots,” Robotica, vol. 20, pp. 213–221, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. M. Azorin, O. Reinoso, J. M. Sabater, and C. Perez, “A new control method of teleoperation with time delay,” Proc. of the International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Coimbra, Portugal, pp. 100–105, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. Janabi-Sharifi, “Collision: modelling, simulation and identification of robotic manipulators interacting with environments,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Kokotovic, H. Khalil, and J. O’Reilly, Singular Perturbation Methods in Control Analysis and Design, Academic Press, London, 1999.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. A. F. Ivanov, M. A. Pinto, and S. I. Trofimchuk, “Global behavior in nonlinear system with delayed feedback,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, pp. 4420–4421, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. F. Ivanov and A. N. Sharkovsky, “Oscillations in singularly perturbed delay equations,” Dynamics Reported, Springer, pp. 165–224, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. K. Young, Wavelet Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. G. Lekutai, Adaptive Self-TUNING Neuro Wavelet Network Controllers, Doctoral thesis, Virginia polytechnic Institute and State University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. M. Combes, A. Grossmann, and ph. Tchamitchain, Eds., Wavelets: Time-frequency Methods and Phase Space, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Sheng, D. Roberge, and H. Szu, “Optical wave let transform,” Optical Eng., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1840–1845, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. J. E. Colgate, “Robust impedance shaping telemanipulation,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 374–384, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheil Ganjefar.

Additional information

Recommended by Editorial Board member Shinsuk Park under the direction of Editor Hyouk Ryeol Choi.

Soheil Ganjefar was born in Iran, in 1971. He received his B.S. degree from the Ferdoowsi University, Mashhad, Iran, in 1994, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, in 1997 and 2003, respectively, all in Electrical Engineering. He is currently an associate professor in the department of Electrical Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. His current research interests include Teleoperation Systems control, Optimal Control, Neural network and Singular perturbation systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganjefar, S. Adaptive wavenet controller design for teleoperation systems with variable time delays using singular perturbation method. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 11, 597–607 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-012-0015-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-012-0015-3

Keywords

Navigation