H∞ control for networked systems with data packet dropout
- 218 Downloads
This paper considers the H ∞ control problem of networked control systems, respectively, for the two cases that system state is available and unavailable. It is assumed that there exists a communication network in the feedback loop, and multiple data packet dropouts may happen. An estimation method is introduced to compensate the lost data. And then, the design of H ∞ control is considered for the states available and states unavailable, respectively, and some sufficient conditions are derived such that the closed-loop systems are exponentially mean-square stable with prescribed H ∞ disturbance attenuation level.
KeywordsData packet dropout disturbance attenuation networked systems state unavailable
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- P. Seiler and P. Sengupta, “Analysis of communication losses in vehicle control problems,” Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf., Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 1491–1496, 2001.Google Scholar
- H. C. Cho and K. S. Lee, “Nonlinear networked control systems with random nature using neural approach and dynamic Bayesian networks,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 444–452, 2008.Google Scholar
- K. Ji and W.-J. Kim, “Robust control for networked control systems with admissible parameter uncertainties,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 372–378, 2007.Google Scholar
- H. Li, Z. Sun, B. Chen, H. Liu, and F. Sun, “Intelligent scheduling control of networked control systems with networked-induced delay and packet dropout,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 915–927, 2008.Google Scholar
- B. Azimi-Sadjade, “Stability of networked control systems in the presence of packet losses,” Proc. of IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, USA, pp. 676–680, 2003.Google Scholar
- V. Gupta, D. Spanos, B. Hassibi, and R. M. Murray, “On LQG control across a stochastic packet-dropping link,” Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf., Portland, OR, USA, pp. 360–365, 2005.Google Scholar