Advertisement

Integer least squares with quadratic equality constraints and its application to GNSS attitude determination systems

Regular Papers Control Applications

Abstract

In this paper we introduce the quadratically constrained integer least-squares problem and show how the LAMBDA method can be used to solve it for the purpose of GNSS attitude determination. The integer least-squares principle with quadratic equality constraints (ILSQE) is used to formulate our cost function. The solution of the ILSQE problem is derived and it is shown how the solution can be computed efficiently and rigorously with a novel LAMBDA based method. Experimental results with various single frequency GPS receivers are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed method. The method is also compared with some current methods of GNSS attitude determination. Apart from its efficiency, the proposed method is shown to dramatically improve the success rates of integer ambiguity GNSS attitude resolution.

Keywords

Attitude determination GNSS ILSQE integer ambiguity BC-LAMBDA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ashtech, “ADU5: GNSS sensors and marine survey solutions,” http://products.thalesnavigation.com/en/products/index.asp, 2003.
  2. [2]
    I. Y. Bar-Itzhack, P. Montgomery, and J. Garrick, “Algorithm for attitude determination using GPS,” Proc. of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf., New Orleans, LA, USA Paper no. AIAA 97-3616, Aug. 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. E. Cohen, Attitude Determination Using GPS, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Furuno Electric Co., “Model SC-120: Satellite compass,” http://www.furuno.co.jp/english/index.html, 2003.
  5. [5]
    G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan, Matrix Computations, 2nd edition, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. R. Hatch and H. J. Euler, “Comparison of several kinematic techniques,” Proc. of ION GPS-94, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA pp. 363–370, September 20–23, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. J. Jong de and C. C. J. M. Tiberius, The LAMBDA Method For Integer Ambiguity Estimation: Implementation Aspects, Delft Geodetic Computing Centre LGR series, no. 12, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Joosten, The LAMBDA-Method: Matlab™ Implementation. Matlab Toolbox and Manual, Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, TU Delft, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Lu, “Development of a GPS multi-antenna system for attitude determination,” UCGE Reports 20073, Dept. of Geomatics Eng., University of Calgary, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Park, I. Kim, G. I. Jee, and J. G. Lee, “Efficient ambiguity search using constraints equation,” Proc. of IEEE Position, Location and Navigation Symposium PLANS’96, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Park, I. Kim, G. I. Jee, and J. G. Lee, “Efficient technique to fix GPS carrier phase integer ambiguity on-the-fly,” IEE Proceedings, Radar, Sonar and Navigation, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 148–155, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Park and I. Kim, “An error analysis of 2-dimensional attitude determination using global positioning system,” IEICE Transaction on Communications, vol. E83-B, no. 6, pp. 1370–1373, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    C. Park and P. J. G. Teunissen, “A baseline constrained LAMBDA method for an integer ambiguity resolution of GNSS attitude determination system,” Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems (in Korean), vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 587–594, June 2008.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. J. G. Teunissen, Least-squares Estimation of the Integer Ambiguities, Delft Geodetic Computing Centre LGR series, no. 6, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. J. G. Teunissen, “A new method for fast carrier phase ambiguity estimation,” Proc. of IEEE Position, Location and Navigation Symposium PLANS’94, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 562–573, April 11–15, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. J. G. Teunissen and A. Kleusberg editors, GPS for Geodesy, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. J. G. Teunissen, “Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping,” Journal of Geodesy, vol. 72, pp. 606–612, 1998.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. J. G. Teunissen, “GNSS ambiguity bootstrapping: theory and application,” Proc. of International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation, Banff, Canada, pp. 246–254, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. J. G. Teunissen, “Theory of carrier phase ambiguity resolution,” Proc. of the 9th GNSS workshop-2002 International Symposium on GPS/GNSS, November 6–8, Wuhan, China, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. C. J. M. Tiberius, Recursive Data Processing for Kinematic GPS Surveying, Ph.D. Thesis, Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, TU Delft, 1998.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    C. H. Tu, K. Y. Wang, and W. C. Melton, “GPS compass: a novel navigation equipment,” Proc. of ION National Technical Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, USA, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    S. Verhagen, Visualization of GNSS-related design parameters. Manual for Matlab User Interface Visual, Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, TU Delft, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Ziebart and P. Cross, “LEO GPS attitude determination algorithm for a macro-satellite using boom-arm deployed antennas,” GPS Solutions, vol. 6, pp. 242–256, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems Engineers and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical and Computer Eng.Chungbuk National UniversityChungbukKorea
  2. 2.Delft Institute for Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS)Technical University of DelftDelftthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations