Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Medical physicists in radiology – present status in AFOMP region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wide use of ionization radiation in healthcare and increasing high radiation procedures like computed tomography [CT] and interventional radiology [IR] procedures have raised serious safety and health concerns for both patients and health professionals necessitating establishment of a radiation protection culture. Responsibilities for radiation protection in the imaging team lies on the radiologists, radiation technologists and medical physicists. However the role of the medical physicist [MP] in radiology imaging is not as well established as it is in radiation oncology. In radiation oncology, clinical medical physicists are mandatory by law but many radiology departments currently operate without MP, though international standards and requirements mandates the role of the MP in radiation protection in radiology. The Asia Oceania Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics [AFOMP] has 19 National Member Organizations [NMO] as members and 2 NMO’s as affiliate members from Asia–Pacific region covering about 4.5 billion population with majority of countries are less-developed countries with lack of appropriate infrastructure and funding, lack of regulations regarding requirement of MPand, awareness of radiation protection. We have carried out survey by sending a questionnaire to AFOMP member countries to get the information about number of MP in radiotherapy, radiology and related details. We have received response from 21 countries, the data collected is analyzed and found that 16/21 counties have MP in radiology and number of MP vary from 0.94% to 69.9% as compared 21/21 countries having MP in radiotherapy varies from 16.7% to 94.4%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR2008 report on Sources and effects of ionizing radiation https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2008/UNSCEAR_2008_Report_Vol.I.pdf

  2. NCRP Report No. 160, 2009: Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hart D, Wall, BF, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Chilton: Health Protection Agency, 2010: HPACRCE-012

  4. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems1996-2010. JAMA. 2012;307:2400–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ploussi A, Efstathopoulos EP. Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in radiology department. World journal of radiology. 2016;8(2):142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meghzifene A, Vano E, Le HJ, Cheung KY. Roles and responsibilities of medical physicists in radiation protection Ahmed. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:24–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McLean D, Thomas B et al. Recommendations for accreditation and certification of medical physics education and clinical training programmes in the rca region 2014 https://humanhealth.iaea.org/HHW/MedicalPhysics/TheMedicalPhysicist/EducationandTrainingRequirements/Accreditation_and_Certification/Recommendations_for_accreditation_and_certification_in_medical_physics.pdf

  8. Republic of Indonesia, 2004. Law of  the Republic of Indonesia Number  29 Year 2004 Regarding the Medical Practice. Jakarta: The President of the Republic of Indonesia, 116 (addendum of statute of Republic of Indonesia number 4431), pp.1-49.

  9. Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency (BAPETEN), Indonesia, 2008. Licensing of the utilization of ionizing radiation sources and nuclear material. Jakarta: President of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 29, pp.1-107.

  10. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, General Safety Requirements. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3. International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna, 2014.

  11. European Commission. Council directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the danger of ionizing radiation to medical exposure. Official J Eur Com. 1997:180:22–27.

  12. American Association of Physicists in Medicine [AAPM] :Staffing levels and responsibilities of physicists in diagnostic radiology, AAPM REPORT NO. 33, 1991

  13. American Association of Physicists in Medicine [AAPM] : The role of the clinical medical physicist in diagnostic radiology description of the role of the clinical medical physicist, AAPM REPORT NO 42,1994

  14. Salerno S, Marchese P, Magistrelli A, Tomà P, Matranga D, et al. Radiation risks knowledge in resident and fellow in pediatrics: a questionnaire survey. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vano E, Rosenstein M, Liniecki J, Rehani MM, Martin CJ, Vetter RJ. ICRP Publication 113. Education and training in radiological protection for diagnostic and interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2009;39: 7–68.

  16. Vano E, Ubeda C, Miranda P, Leyton F, Durán A, Nader A. Radiation protection in pediatric interventional cardiology: An IAEA PILOT program in Latin America. Health Phys. 2011;101:233–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Järvinen H, Vassileva J, Samei E, Wallace A, Vano E, Rehani M. Patient dose monitoring and the use of diagnostic reference levels for the optimization of protection in medical imaging: current status and challenges worldwide. J Med Imag. 2017;4(3):312–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fetterly KA, Mathew V, Lennon R, Bell MR, Holmes DR, Rihal CS. Radiation dose reduction in the invasive cardiovascular laboratory: implementing a culture and philosophy of radiation safety. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:866–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahadevappa M. Essential role of a medical physicist in the radiology department. RadioGraphics. 2018;38:1665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sensakovic WF. Role of Medical Physicists in the Diagnostic Residency Training Program. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2017;14(1):119–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IAEA and WHO, Bonn call for action. 10 Actions to improve radiation protection in medicine in the next decade. Joint position statement by IAEA and WHO. 2013.

  22. Tabakov S. Global number of medical physicists and its growth 1965–2015. Med Phys Int J. 2016;4(2):78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Evans S, Christofides S, Brambilla M. The European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics. Policy Statement No. 7.1: The roles, responsibilities and status of the medical physicist including the criteria for the staffing levels in a Medical Physics Department approved by EFOMP Council. Physica Medica. 2016;32:533–540.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiological Physics, SMS Medical College & Hospitals, Senior Professor & Head, Jaipur, India

    Arun Chougule

Authors
  1. Arun Chougule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Chougule.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chougule, A. Medical physicists in radiology – present status in AFOMP region. Health Technol. 11, 295–303 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00521-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00521-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation