Health and Technology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 73–81 | Cite as

Are smartphone health applications effective in modifying obesity and smoking behaviours? A systematic review

Review Paper


Technological interventions specifically, mobile health application have risen dramatically. Individuals prefer to seek support from a mobile health application, which can serve to be effective in delivering health promotion initiatives and interventions. Therefore, we aimed to assess the available mobile “apps” for smoking and obesity by conducting a systematic review of current mobile “app” controlled interventions. Research articles published between 2006 and 2013 were considered, seven research papers were included within the review. An introduction and overview of the current research available in understanding the efficacy and development of mobile health ‘apps’ was outlined. In conclusion this review proposes the need for more comprehensive research within this area. Publishing accurate findings will provide good basis for understanding if smoking or obesity can be altered and supported through smartphone mobile application. Mobile technology has the potential to reach millions, with the on-going development of new innovative phones, offering health promotion and intervention through this portal is the future.


Smartphone Application Internet Smoking Obesity Prevention Web 


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP. Should we trust Web-based studies? a comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. Am Psychol. 2004;59(2):93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swartz LHG, Noell JW, Schroeder SW, Ary DV. A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tob Control. 2006;15(1):7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS. 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasser R, Brodbeck D, Degen M, Luthiger J, Wyss R, Reichlin S. Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation. In Persuasive Technol. 2006;3962:27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whittaker R, Borland R, Bullen C, Lin RB, McRobbie H, Rodgers A. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbone JC, Kverndokkb S, Røgebergb OJ. Smoking, health, risk, and perception. J Health Econ. 2005;24:631–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carson KV, Brinn MP, Labiszewski NA, Esterman AJ, Chang AB, Smith BJ (2011) Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Wiley; 7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Civljak M, Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, Sheikh A, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. doi:  10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub4.
  9. 9.
    Jebb SA, Rennie KL, Cole TJ. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among young people in Great Britain. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilton S, Patterson P, Teyhan A. Escalating coverage of obesity in UK newspapers: the evolution and framing of the obesity epidemic from 1996 to 2010. Obesity. 2012;20(8):1688–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Werkman A, Seydel ER. Usage and effect of a web-based intervention for the prevention of overweight; a RCT. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160:28–32.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherwood NE, Jeffery RW, Pronk NP, Boucher JL, Hanson A, Boyle R, et al. Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: weigh-to-be 2-year outcomes. Int J Obes. 2006;30(10):1565–73.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, Whittaker R, Edwards P, Zhou W, et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): A single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carter MC, Burley VJ, Nykjaer C, Cade JE. Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: pilot randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glanz K, Rimer KB and Viswanath K. Health behaviour and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th edition. Jossey- Bass, Wiley; 2008. ISBN: 9780787996147.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haug S, Schaub MP, Venzin V, Meyer C, John U. Efficacy of a text message-based smoking cessation intervention for young people: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15(8):e171. URL: doi:  10.2196/jmir.2636.
  17. 17.
    Cohn AM, Hunter-Reel D, Hagman BT, Mitchell J. Promoting behavior change from alcohol use through mobile technology: the future of ecological momentary assessment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(12):2209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City University LondonIslingtonUK

Personalised recommendations