Health and Technology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 329–336 | Cite as

How trustworthy are apps for maternal and child health?

  • Karen M. Scott
  • Gastao A. Gome
  • Deborah Richards
  • Patrina H. Y. Caldwell
Original Paper


Mobile technologies have become important tools for promoting and implementing healthcare. A key feature of smartphones and tablet computers is their ability to run software applications (apps), which can address specific health-related areas, including maternal and child health; however, there is little independent regulation or guidance for the development and publication of health apps in many countries, including Australia. This research examined health apps in two major app stores (Google and Apple) that address maternal and child health. Ten free maternal and child health apps available in Google and Apple stores were examined to evaluate their trustworthiness and technical performance. This was determined based on evidence of health professional involvement and use of evidence-based medical content, as well as an evaluation of functionality, usability and security. Only four of the ten apps examined were developed with the involvement of health professionals and four provided information from evidence-based medical content. Significantly, only four were fully functional, two were fully usable and three adequately implemented security mechanisms to guarantee privacy of user data. Two of the apps were inoperative. In conclusion, this study found great variation in the quality of content, functionality and security of ten maternal and child health apps. These results suggest developers, owners and health providers should work to improve maternal and child health apps, consumers need help to determine the trustworthiness of health apps, and sponsors and regulators should establish standards and endorse compliant health apps.


mHealth Applications Apps Mobile Maternal Children 


Conflict of interest

KS, GG, DR and PC declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Studies with humans and animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.


  1. 1.
    Klasnja P, Pratt W. Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:184–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu C et al. Status and trends of mobile-health applications for iOS devices: A developer’s perspective. J Syst Softw. 2011;84:2022–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parker RM et al. Text4baby in the United States and Russia: an opportunity for understanding how mHealth affects maternal and child health. J Health Commun. 2012;17:30–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tamrat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:1092–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mulvaney SA, Ho Y-X, Cala CM et al. Assessing adolescent asthma symptoms and adherence using mobile phones. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacob E et al. Usability testing of a smartphone for accessing a web-based e-diary for self-monitoring of pain and symptoms in sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012;34(5):326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiang CZ, Yamamichi M, Hausman V, Altman D, Unit IS. Mobile applications for the health sector. Washington: World Bank; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barton AJ. The regulation of mobile health applications. BMC Med. 2012;10:46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narasimhan P et al. A customized m-Health system for improving tuberculosis treatment adherence and follow-up in south India. Heal Technol. 2014;4(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    research2guidance. mHealth App Developer Economics: Fourth annual study on mHealth app publishing. 2014. [3 March 2015]; Available from:
  12. 12.
    Burke KB, Sargant N, Marden B. Smartphone technology in the paediatric setting. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:1007–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chouffani R. The different types of mobile health apps. Health IT Exchange 2011 [2 March 2015]; Avaiable from:
  14. 14.
    Burke KB, Onugha N. iPresenting complaint - two cases of children referred due to parental use of iphone applications. Arch Dis Child. 2012;2012:A11–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu C., et al. Design and implementation of a behavioral migraine management iPhone app for adolescents with migraine. in World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2010 I.E. International Symposium on a. 2010. IEEE.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Low DK, Pittaway AP. The ‘iPhone’induction–a novel use for the Apple iPhone. Pediatr Anesth. 2008;18:573–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Handel MJ. mHealth (mobile health)—using apps for health and wellness. Explore J Sci Healing. 2011;7(4):256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leroux E., Rivas H. Evidence-based mHealth [7 August 2014]. Available from:
  19. 19.
    McCartney M. How do we know whether medical apps work? BMJ. 2013;346.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. Can mobile health technologies transform health care? JAMA. 2013;310(22):2395–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    WHO. New horizons for health through mobile technologies. In: Global observatory for eHealth series. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kind T., Silber, T.J. Ethical issues in pediatric e-health. Clin Pediatr. 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vartiainen P. On the principles of comparative evaluation. Evaluation. 2002;8(3):359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gordon M.E. The history of app pricing, and why most apps are free. In: Flurry Blog M.E. Gordon, editor. 2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sommerville I. Software engineering. Harlow: Addison-Wesley; 2010.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    IEEE. IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc; 2009.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    UsabilityNet. What is usability? 2006 [7 August 2014]; Available from:
  28. 28.
    Nielsen J. 10 Usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group. 1995 [2 March 2015]; Available from:
  29. 29.
    BusinessDictionary. Business Dictionary. 2013 [7 August 2014]. Available from:
  30. 30.
    Rice K. What are the pros and cons to building an app for iOS? Mobile Backend as a Service (MBAAS) Blog. 2013 [3 March 2015]; Available:
  31. 31.
    Mack J. Reigning in the “wild west” of mobile health apps: will it be FDA regulation or self-regulation or both? Pharma Market News. 2013;12:1–7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    NHS. Health Apps Library. 2013 [9 February 2015]; Available from:
  33. 33.
    PatientView. European directory of health apps 2012–2013. 2012 [9 February 2015]; Available from:
  34. 34.
    FDA. Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. 2014 [9 February 2015]; Available from:
  35. 35.
    Leventhal R. Study: popular mobile health apps carry considerable privacy risks. 2013 [9 February 2015]; Available from:
  36. 36.
    Narisi S. Mobile health apps create privacy risk, study says. Healthcare Business and Technology 2013 [7 August 2014]; Available from:
  37. 37.
    Atienza AA, Patrick K. Mobile health: the killer app for cyberinfrastructure and consumer health. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5, Supplement 2):S151–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glynn RW et al. Patterns of internet and smartphone use by parents of children attending a pediatric otolaryngology service. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(5):699–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Walsh B. mHealth market poised for explosive growth. Clinical Innovation + Technology. 2013 [3 March 2015]; Available:
  40. 40.
    Rodrigues J, Diez I, Abajo B. Telemedicine and e-health services, policies, and applications: advancements and developments. Hershey: Medical Information Science Reference; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    research2guidance. Mobile Health Trends and Figures 2013 - 2017: The Commercialisation of Mobile Health Applications (vol. 3). 2013 [3 March 2015]; Available:

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen M. Scott
    • 1
  • Gastao A. Gome
    • 2
  • Deborah Richards
    • 2
  • Patrina H. Y. Caldwell
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Discipline of Paediatrics and Child HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ComputingMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.The Children’s Hospital at WestmeadSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations