Skip to main content

Xenophobia, Partisanship, and Support for Donald Trump and the Republican Party

Race and Social Problems volume 14, pages 69–83 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

During his 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump distinguished himself from other candidates via his hardline stances on issues of immigration. Using data from national surveys conducted between 2014 and 2019, we identify three key findings about views of immigrants among the American public during the Trump era. First, xenophobia was the strongest predictor of Americans’ feelings—anger, fear, pride, and hope—about Donald Trump during his time in office, and the second strongest predictor of feelings about the Republican party (after partisan identification). Second, the influence of Americans’ levels of xenophobia on their feelings about the Republican Party were significantly mediated by their feelings about Trump, especially for negative affect (anger and fear). Third, there has been a backlash against xenophobia, such that political independents and Democrats became significantly more favorable toward immigrants after 2016. As a result, views of immigrants have become more favorable overall, but also more politically polarized. These findings support and extend immigration backlash theory, contribute to research on affective polarization, and document consequential trends in contemporary American politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Abrajano, M., & Hajnal, Z. L. (2015). White backlash: Immigration, race, and American politics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, A. I. (2018). The great alignment: Race, party transformation, and the rise of Donald Trump. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, A., & McCoy, J. (2019). United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, A., & Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Art, D. (2020). The myth of global populism. Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720003552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, C. D., Baker, J. O., Day, L. E., & Gordon, A. (2020). Fear itself: The causes and consequences of fear in America. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. O., Cañarte, D., & Day, L. E. (2018). Race, xenophobia, and punitiveness among the American public. Sociological Quarterly, 59(3), 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. O., & Edmonds, A. E. (2021). Immigration, presidential politics, and partisan polarization among the American public, 1992–2018. Sociological Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2021.1900760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. O., Perry, S. L., & Whitehead, A. L. (2020). Keep America Christian (and white): Christian nationalism, fear of ethnoracial outsiders, and intention to vote for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Sociology of Religion, 81(3), 272–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banda, K. K., & Cluverius, J. (2018). Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization. Electoral Studies, 56, 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougher, L. D. (2016). The correlates of discord: Identity, issue alignment, and political hostility in polarized America. Political Behavior, 39, 731–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callegaro, M., & DiSogra, C. (2008). Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 1008–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, E. C., & Barnes, T. D. (2019). Reconciling sexism and women’s support for Republican candidates: A look at gender, class, and whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 presidential races. Political Behavior, 41, 677–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, E. C., & Holman, M. (2019). Playing the woman card: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Political Psychology, 40(1), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, L., Lajevardi, N., & Oskooii, K. A. R. (2018). A change of heart? Why individual-level public opinion shifted against Trump’s “Muslim Ban.” Political Behavior, 40, 1035–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. (2019). Gender, sexism, and the election: Did sexism help Trump more than it hurt Clinton? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 713–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 732–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Methods Research, 39(4), 709–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhorta, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. C. (2018). The effects of the early Trump presidency on public attitudes toward the Republican Party. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 48(3), 404–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, S. K., & DiGiusto, G. M. (2014). Xenophobia and immigrant contact: French public attitudes toward immigration. The Social Science Journal, 51(3), 464–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumpal, I. (2012). Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-Semitism in Germany: A comparison of randomized response and direct questioning. Social Science Research, 41, 1387–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajevardi, N., & Oskooii, K. A. R. (2018). Old-fashioned racism, contemporary Islamophobia, and the isolation of Muslim Americans in the age of Trump. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 3(1), 112–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2018). Partisan information sources and affective polarization: Panel analysis of the mediating role of anger and fear. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 767–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWilliams, M. C. (2016). Who decides when the party doesn’t? Authoritarian voters and the rise of Donald Trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 716–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2021) Republicans’ overthrow of Liz Cheney risks worsening their headaches. New York Times, May 12.

  • Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mize, T. D. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Lee, J. (2018). Trump voters and the white working class. Sociological Science, 5(10), 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. & Hook, J. (2016) Poll: Donald Trump widens his lead in Republican presidential race. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/poll-donald-trump-widens-his-lead-in-republican-presidential-race-1452808842.

  • Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, K. A., Redford, L., Conway, J., & Smith, C. T. (2019). Engendering support: Hostile sexism predicts voting for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(4), 578–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reny, T. T., Collingwood, L., & Valenzuela, A. A. (2019). Vote switching in the 2016 election: How racial and immigration attitudes, not economics, explain shifts in white voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2018). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, R. R., & Kim, D. H. (2014). Xenophobia and racism. Critical Philosophy of Race, 2(1), 20–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, P. D., Torres, M., Sinclair, B., & Smith, S. S. (2019). Pathways to trump: Republican voters in 2016. Electoral Studies, 61, 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veer, K., Yakushko, O., Ommundson, R., & Higler, L. (2011). Cross-national measure of fear-based xenophobia: Development of a cumulative scale. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, S. W., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017). The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the U.S. electorate. American Politics Research, 45(4), 621–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. B. (2018) The Snake in full: Read Donald Trump's anti-immigration poem. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/snake-read-full-trump-poem-cpac-anti-immigration-verses-mexican-border-a8225686.html. Accessed 22 April 2021.

  • Whitehead, A. L., Perry, S. L., & Baker, J. O. (2018). Make America Christian again: Christian nationalism and voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Sociology of Religion, 79(2), 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (1997). Explaining xenophobia and racism: A critical review of current research approaches. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20(1), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakushko, O. (2018) Modern-day xenophobia: critical historical and theoretical perspectives on the roots of anti-immigrant prejudice. Cham, CH: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology & Anthropology, East Tennessee State University, Box 70644, Johnson City, TN, 37614, USA

    Joseph O. Baker

  2. Department of Sociology, Chapman University, 1 University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA

    Christopher D. Bader

Authors
  1. Joseph O. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher D. Bader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joseph O. Baker or Christopher D. Bader.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, J.O., Bader, C.D. Xenophobia, Partisanship, and Support for Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Race Soc Probl 14, 69–83 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-021-09337-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-021-09337-0

Keywords

  • Xenophobia
  • Donald Trump
  • Political polarization
  • Affective polarization
  • Immigration backlash