Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is White Always Right? Skin Color and Interdating Among Whites

  • Published:
Race and Social Problems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The burgeoning literature on skin color stratification highlights how skin color is associated with disparities in outcomes such as socioeconomic status, health, and intergroup relationships among ethnoracial minorities. However, there is a limited body of work that suggests that darker skin color is also associated with differing outcomes among whites in spite of their position as the socially dominant group of the U.S. This study uses the National Longitudinal Survey of Freshmen to examine how skin color, among whites, relates to their likelihood of dating ethnoracial minorities. The results show that darker skin color is associated with greater odds of dating Latinos and Asians. The results also suggest that there is a non-linear relationship between whites’ skin color and their likelihood of dating blacks. The author argues that because darker skin color connotes lower status due to its affiliation with non-whiteness, darker skin color among whites can lead to greater interactions with ethnoracial minorities. However, there may be an exception when dating blacks. This study highlights a possible underlying mechanism, ethnoracial ambiguity among whites, that shapes current ethnoracial relations, which has long-term implications for the future of intergroup boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Whites, blacks, and Asians in this study, are individuals who identify as non-Latino white, non-Latino black, and non-Latino Asian (respectively). Latinos can be of any race.

  2. Individuals who explicitly state no religious beliefs are coded as “other.”

References

  • Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bany, J. A., Robnett, B., & Feliciano, C. (2014). Gendered black exclusion: The persistence of racial stereotypes among daters. Race and Social Problems, 6(3), 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. D., Lee, J., & Bachmeier, J. D. (2013). Immigration & the color line at the beginning of the 21st Century. Daedalus, 142(3), 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2004). The influence of afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15(10), 674–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 931–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branigan, A. R., Freese, J., Patir, A., McDade, T. W., Liu, K., & Kiefe, C. I. (2013). Skin color, sex, and educational attainment in the post-civil rights era. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1659–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buggs, S. G. (2019). Color, culture, or cousin? Multiracial Americans and framing boundaries in interracial relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(5), 1221–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Castillo, C. (2019). Exploring skin color and black-white differences in trust in physicians in a cross-sectional study of US adults. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(4), 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. H., & Tienda, M. (2017). Marriage-market constraints and mate-selection behavior: Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in intermarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curington, C. V., Lin, K., & Lundquist, J. H. (2015). Positioning multiraciality in cyberspace: Treatment of multiracial daters in an online dating website. American Sociological Review, 80(4), 764–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. R., & Telles, E. E. (2017). Skin color and colorism: Global research, concepts, and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, A. W. (2003). Rethinking Whiteness Studies. In A. W. Doane & E. Bonilla-Silva (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of racism (pp. 3–18). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, R. (1997). White. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feliciano, C. (2016). Shades of race: How phenotype and observer characteristics shape racial classification. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(4), 390–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feliciano, C., & Robnett, B. (2014). How external racial classifications shape Latino dating choices. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 11(2), 295–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feliciano, C., Robnett, B., & Komaie, G. (2009). Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters. Social Science Research, 38(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. J. (2011). Interracial contact and changes in the racial attitudes of white college students. Social Psychology of Education, 14(4), 547–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C., & Guglielmo, T. A. (2012). Defining America’s racial boundaries: Blacks, Mexicans, and European immigrants, 1890–1945. American Journal of Sociology, 118(2), 327–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, S. (2007). Whiteness: An introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W. (2013). Who are people willing to date? Ethnic and gender patterns in online dating. Race and Social Problems, 5(1), 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Hertel, B. R. (1990). The significance of color remains: A study of life chances, mate selection, and ethnic consciousness among Black Americans. Social Forces, 68(4), 1105–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughey, M. W. (2012). White bound: Nationalists, antiracists, and the shared meanings of race. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (1998). Colorstruck: Skin color stratification in the lives of African American women. Sociological Inquiry, 68(4), 517–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (2005). Race, gender, and the politics of skin tone. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatiev, N. (1995). How the irish became white. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N. G. (2012). Living color: The biological and social meaning of skin color. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. B., & Bratter, J. L. (2007). A path toward interracial marriage: Women’s first partners and husbands across racial lines. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(2), 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. D., & Johnson, B. D. (2016). A punishing look: Skin tone and afrocentric features in the halls of justice. American Journal of Sociology, 122(1), 90–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bean, F. D. (2010). The diversity paradox: Immigration and the color line in twenty-first century America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., Taylor, P. L., & Caudle, E. (2007). Interethnic and interracial dating in college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(3), 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, N., Vargas, E., Juarez, M., Cacari-Stone, L., & Bettez, S. (2018). What’s your “street race”? Leveraging multidimensional measures of race and intersectionality for examining physical and mental health status among Latinxs. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 4(1), 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, E. A. (2010). When does race matter? Race, sex, and dating at an Elite University. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(1), 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M. (2006). Working-class white: The making and unmaking of race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M., & Samson, F. L. (2005). White racial and ethnic identity in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, E. P. (2014). Skin tone stratification among Black Americans, 2001–2003. Social Forces, 92(4), 1313–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, E. P. (2015). The cost of color: Skin color, discrimination, and health among African-Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 396–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Integrated postsecondary education data system. Retrieved Aug 8, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/.

  • National Longitudinal Survey of Freshmen. (n.d.). NLSF: National longitudinal survey of freshmen. Retrieved Sept 28, 2017, from https://nlsf.princeton.edu/.

  • Newport, F. (2013, July 25). In U.S., 87% approve of Black-White marriage, vs. 4% in 1958. Retrieved February 1, 2020 from https://news.gallup.com/poll/163697/approve-marriage-blacks-whites.aspx.

  • Robnett, B., & Feliciano, C. (2011). Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces, 89(3), 807–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondilla, J. L., & Spickard, P. (2007). Is lighter better?: Skin-tone discrimination among Asian Americans. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquillo, J., Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Lu, Z., Nandy, A., & Maddox, K. B. (2007). The effects of skin tone on race-related amygdala activity: An fMRI investigation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(1), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santana, E. (2018). Is love (color) blind?: Skin color and interdating across ethnoracial groups. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, PA.

  • U.S. News & World Report. (n.d.). U.S. news best colleges. Retrieved August 8, 2019 from https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges.

  • Wang, H., & Kao, G. (2007). Does higher socioeconomic status increase contact between minorities and whites? An examination of interracial romantic relationships among adolescents. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 146–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, J. M. (2015). Disciplined preferences. Social Problems, 62(3), 455–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Ortiz, S., Robinson, B. A., & Khan, C. (2018). Race and sexuality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, P. T. (2007) Regression with missing ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed sata. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, G. (2002). Who interracially dates: An examination of the characteristics of those who have interracially dated. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(2), 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, G. (2009). Crossracial differences in the racial preferences of potential dating partners: A test of the alienation of African Americans and social dominance orientation. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(1), 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, Douglas Massey for being so helpful with the NLSF dataset, and Jun-Chih Gisela Lin for giving me the final vote of confidence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sociology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Emilce Santana

Authors
  1. Emilce Santana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilce Santana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santana, E. Is White Always Right? Skin Color and Interdating Among Whites. Race Soc Probl 12, 313–322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-020-09285-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-020-09285-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation