Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Metropolitan Area Racial Composition on Visible Consumption Among Whites and Racial/Ethnic Minorities

  • Published:
Race and Social Problems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines visible consumption patterns among racial/ethnic minorities and whites in the USA. We use data from the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey (CEX) and the Current Population Survey to measure consumption behaviors. Expenditure on clothing is used as a measure of visible consumption. Our hypotheses are derived from the visible consumption theoretical framework as posited by Veblen and from status display models. However, contrasting with these theoretical frameworks, our results do not confirm previous findings that African Americans and other minorities have higher levels of expenditures on visible items as compared to whites. Instead, we find income, education and occupation (socioeconomic status) to be more important predictors of visible consumption than race and ethnicity. Further, we find that consumption behaviors are influenced by the proportion of whites in a metropolitan area, which we do relate to race/ethnicity. We pay particular attention to the consumption behaviors of racial minorities in relation to their metropolitan area racial composition. Our results raise interesting questions about the theoretical propositions made regarding differences in visible consumption expenditures among racial/ethnic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexis, M. (1970). Patterns of black consumption 1935–1960. Journal of Black Studies, 1(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B., & Lobel, L. S. (1952). “Fashion” in women’s clothes and the American social system. Social Forces, 31(2), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, P. (1974). The decline and fall of the status symbol: Some thoughts on status in a post-industrial society. Social Problems, 21(4), 480–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrell, L. N., Kiefe, C. I., Diez-Roux, A. V., Williams, D. R., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2013). Racial discrimination, racial/ethnic segregation, and health behaviors in the CARDIA study. Ethnicity and Health, 18(3), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratter, J. L., & Gorman, B. K. (2011). Is discrimination an equal opportunity risk? Racial experiences, socioeconomic status, and health status among black and white adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. N. (2001). Exposure to all black contexts and psychological well-being. African American Research Perspectives, 7, 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celious, A., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Race from the inside: An emerging heterogeneous race model. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, A. B., Kasl, S. V., Holford, T. R., Lewis, T. T., & Jones, B. A. (2010). Neighborhood- and individual-level socioeconomic variation in perceptions of racial discrimination. Ethnicity and Health, 15(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donthu, N., & Cherian, J. (1992). Hispanics coupon usage: The impact of strong and weak ethnic identification. Psychology and Marketing, 9(6), 501–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L., & Feagin, J. R. (2012). Middle-class African American pilots: The continuing significance of racism. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(5), 650–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. X. (2000). Linking consumer debt and consumer expenditures: Do borrowers spend money differently? Family and Consumer Science Research Journal, 28(3), 357–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. X., & Lewis, J. K. (1999). Budget allocation patterns of African Americans. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(1), 134–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, C. M., Lamont, M., & Welburn, J. S. (2012). African Americans respond to stigmatization: the meanings and salience of confronting, deflecting conflict, educating the ignorant and ‘managing the self’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(3), 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (1989). The relative size of minority populations and white attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 820–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. O., Wise, L. A., Jipguep, M., Ozier, Y. C., & Rosenberg, L. (2007). Neighborhood racial composition and perceptions of racial discrimination: Evidence from the black women’s health study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(3), 272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. B., Thoits, P. A., & Taylor, H. F. (1995). Composition of the workplace and psychological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America’s black elite. Social Forces, 74(2), 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80(3), 937–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2001). How blacks use consumption to shape their collective identity: Evidence from marketing specialists. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1(1), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omori, M. (2010). Household expenditures on children, 2007–2008. Monthly labor review, September, 3–16.

  • Segura, D. A. (1992). Chicanas in white-collar jobs: “You have to prove yourself more”. Sociological Perspectives, 35(1), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, K., & Irvin, M. (2012). Workplace racial composition, perceived discrimination, and organizational attachment. Social Science Research, 41, 657–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, R. D., Panter, A. T., Daye, C. E., Allen, W. R., & Wightman, L. F. (2012). Examining the relationship among self-reported assertiveness, perceived discrimination, and college environment in a national sample of black women law students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1894). The economic theory of woman’s dress. The Popular Science Monthly, 46, 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vespa, J., Lewis, J. M., & Kreider, R. M. (2013). America’s families and living arrangements: 2012. Current population reports, P20-570. U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC.

  • Wagner, J., & Soberon-Ferrer, H. (1990). The effect of ethnicity on selected household expenditures. Social Science Journal, 27(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallendorf, M., & Reilly, M. D. (1983). Ethnic migration, assimilation, and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, E. (2012). Resurgent ethnicity among Asian Americans: Ethnic neighborhood context and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(3), 378–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Haile, R., Mohammed, S. A., Herman, A., Sonnega, J., Jackson, J. S., & Stein, D. J. (2012). Perceived discrimination and psychological well-being in the USA and South Africa. Ethnicity and Health, 17(1/2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Criminal Justice, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, 400 East 2nd Street, Bloomsburg, PA, 17815, USA

    Megumi Omori

  2. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Rochester Institute of Technology, 18 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623-5604, USA

    Danielle Taana Smith

Authors
  1. Megumi Omori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle Taana Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megumi Omori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omori, M., Smith, D.T. The Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Metropolitan Area Racial Composition on Visible Consumption Among Whites and Racial/Ethnic Minorities. Race Soc Probl 7, 169–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-015-9149-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-015-9149-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation