Race and Social Problems

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 21–30 | Cite as

The Racial Achievement Gap, Segregated Schools, and Segregated Neighborhoods: A Constitutional Insult



Social and economic disadvantage—not only poverty, but a host of associated conditions—depresses student performance. Concentrating students with these disadvantages in racially and economically homogenous schools depresses it further. Schools that the most disadvantaged black children attend are segregated because they are located in segregated high-poverty neighborhoods, far distant from truly middle-class neighborhoods. Living in such high-poverty neighborhoods for multiple generations adds an additional barrier to achievement, and multigenerational segregated poverty characterizes many African American children today. Education policy is constrained by housing policy: it is not possible to desegregate schools without desegregating both low-income and affluent neighborhoods. However, the policy motivation to desegregate neighborhoods is hobbled by a growing ignorance of the nation’s racial history. It has become conventional for policymakers to assert that the residential isolation of low-income black children is now “de facto,” the accident of economic circumstance, demographic trends, personal preference, and private discrimination. But the historical record demonstrates that residential segregation is “de jure,” resulting from racially motivated and explicit public policy whose effects endure to the present. Without awareness of the history of state-sponsored residential segregation, policymakers are unlikely to take meaningful steps to understand or fulfill the constitutional mandate to remedy the racial isolation of neighborhoods, or the school segregation that flows from it.


Education Housing policy Segregation African Americans Achievement gap Neighborhoods 


  1. Alavosus, L. (Ed.). (2008). History alive!: Pursuing American ideals. Palo Alto: Teachers’ Curriculum Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Ayoub, C., O’Connor, E., Rappolt-Schlictmann, G., Vallotton, C., Raikes, H., & Chazan-Cohen, R. (2009). Cognitive skill performance among young children living in poverty: Risk, change, and the promotive effects of Early Head Start. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(3), 289–305. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aysola, J., Orav, E. J., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2011). Neighborhood characteristics associated with access to patient-centered medical homes for children. Health Affairs, 30(11), 2080–2089. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braden, A. (1958). The wall between. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Markman, L. B. (2005). The contribution of parenting to ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15(1), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buka, S. L., Stichick, T. L., Birdthistle, I., & Earls, F. J. (2001). Youth exposure to violence: Prevalence, risks, and consequences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(3), 298–310. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.71.3.298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burdick-Will, J., Ludwig, J., Raudenbush, S. W., Sampson, R. J., Sonbonmatsu, L., & Sharkey, P. (2010). Converging evidence for neighborhood effects on children’s test scores: An experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational comparison. Paper prepared for the Brookings Institution Project on social inequality and educational disadvantage: New evidence on how families, neighborhoods and labor markets affect educational opportunities for American children. http://cas.uchicago.edu/workshops/education/files/2010/03/Burdick-Will-Ed-Workshop-20100301.pdf.
  8. Colfax, R. N. (2009, Fall). Kennedy v. City of Zanesville: Making the case for water. Human rights, 36(4). American bar association. http://www.americanbar.org/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/human_rights_vol36_2009/fall2009/kennedy_v_city_of_zanesville_making_a_case_for_water.html.
  9. Communiques from the housing front: Venice race-hate meet reported on. (1943, November 18). California eagle, 64(32), pp. 1–2. http://www.archive.org/details/la_caleagle_reel26.
  10. Danzer, G. A., de Alva, J. J. K., Krieger, L. S., Wilson, L. E., & Woloch, N. (2007). The Americans. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, R. O. (1966). Housing reform during the Truman administration. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
  12. Detroit Public Schools. (2009). Detroit city school district. http://detroitk12.org/schools/reports/profiles/district_profile.pdf.
  13. Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2000). Summer learning and home environment. In R. D. Kahlenberg (Ed.), A notion at risk: Preserving public education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 9–30). New York, NY: Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  14. Farah, M. J., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., et al. (2006). Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Research, 1110(1), 166–174. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FHA (Federal Housing Administration). (1938). Underwriting manual: Underwriting and valuation procedure under Title II of the National Housing Act. Excerpts in J. M. Thomas & M. Ritzdorf (Eds.). (1997). Urban planning and the African American community: In the shadows (pp. 282–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Foner, P. S. (1976). Organized labor and the black worker, 1619–1973. New York, NY: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Galster, G., & Godfrey, E. (2005). By words and deeds: Racial steering by real estate agents in the U.S. in 2000. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guryan, J. (2001). Desegregation and black dropout rates. Working Paper 8345, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, H. (1977). Black labor and the American legal system. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  20. Hills v. Gautreaux. 425 U. S. 284 (1976).Google Scholar
  21. Hirsch, A. R. (1998). Making the second ghetto: Race and housing in Chicago, 1940–1960. (Original work published 1983). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirsch, A. R. (2000). Choosing segregation: Federal housing policy between Shelley and Brown. In J. F. Bauman, R. Biles, & K. M. Szylvian (Eds.), From tenements to the Taylor Homes: In search of an urban housing policy in twentieth century America (pp. 206–225). University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Independent Metal Workers, Local 1. 147 N.L.R.B. 1573 (1964).Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jargowsky, P. A. (2013). Concentration of poverty in the new millennium: Changes in the prevalence, composition, and location of high-poverty neighborhoods. The Century Foundation and Rutgers Center for Urban Research and Education. http://www.tcf.org/assets/downloads/Concentration_of_Poverty_in_the_New_Millennium.pdf.
  26. Johnson, R. C. (2011). Long-run impacts of school desegregation & school quality on adult attainments. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Working Paper 16664. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, R. C. (In Progress). The impact of parental wealth on college enrollment & degree attainment: Evidence from the housing boom & bust. Working Paper, 2012. University of California Berkeley: Goldman School of Public Policy. http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ruckerj/RJabstract_ParentalWealth_KidCollege_12-11.pdf.
  28. Julian, E. K., & Daniel, M. M. (1989). Separate and unequal: The root and branch of public housing segregation. Clearinghouse Review, 23, 666–676.Google Scholar
  29. Katznelson, I. (2013). Fear itself: The new deal and the origins of our time. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  30. Kerner Commission (National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders). (1968). Report of the national advisory commission on civil disorders. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  31. King, D. (1995). Separate and unequal: Black Americans and the U.S. federal government. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lapanksy-Werner, E. L., Levy, P. B., Roberts, R., & Taylor, A. (2010). United States history. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  33. Mehana, M., & Reynolds, A. J. (2004). School mobility and achievement: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(1), 93–119. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).Google Scholar
  35. Mishel, L., Bivens, J., Gould, E., & Shierholz, H. (2012). The state of working America (12th Edition). Washington, DC: The Economic Policy Institute. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/subjects/overview/?reader.
  36. Mohl, R. A. (1987). Trouble in paradise: Race and housing in Miami during the New Deal era. Prologue: The Journal of the National Archives, 19(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  37. Mohl, R. A. (2001). Whitening Miami: Race, housing, and government policy in twentieth-century Dade County. The Florida Historical Quarterly, 79(3), 319–345.Google Scholar
  38. Myers, D. (2008). Immigrants’ contributions in an aging America. Communities and Banking, 19(3), 3-5. http://www.bostonfed.org/commdev/c&b/2008/summer/myers_immigrants_and_boomers.pdf.
  39. Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 8–26. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orfield, G. (2009). Reviving the goal of an integrated society: A 21st century challenge. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/reviving-the-goal-of-an-integrated-society-a-21st-century-challenge/orfield-reviving-the-goal-mlk-2009.pdf.
  41. Orfield, G. & Frankenberg, E. (with Ee, J. & Kuscera, J.). (2014). Brown at 60: Great progress, a long retreat and an uncertain future. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/brown-at-60-great-progress-a-long-retreat-and-an-uncertain-future/Brown-at-60-051814.pdf.
  42. Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E pluribus…separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus…separation-deepening-double-segregation-for-more-students/orfield_epluribus_revised_omplete_2012.pdf.
  43. Orfield, G. & Lee, C. (2006). Racial transformation and the changing nature of segregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/racial-transformation-and-the-changing-nature-of-segregation/orfield-racial-transformation-2006.pdf.
  44. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1, 551 U. S. 701 (2007).Google Scholar
  45. Plotkin, W. (1999). Deeds of mistrust: Race, housing, and restrictive covenants in Chicago, 19001953. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from Proquest. (9941500).Google Scholar
  46. Power, G. (1986, March). The development of residential Baltimore, 19001930. Paper presented at the Chancellor’s Colloquium, University of Maryland at Baltimore.Google Scholar
  47. Power, G. (2004). Meade v. Dennistone: The NAACP’s test case to “…sue Jim Crow out of Maryland with the Fourteenth Amendment.” Maryland Law Review, 63(4), 773–810. http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3230&context=mlr.
  48. Raudenbush, S. W., Jean, M., & Art, E. (2011). Year-by-year and cumulative impacts of attending a high-mobility elementary school on children’s mathematics achievement in Chicago, 1995 to 2005. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 359–376). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  49. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-White Achievement Gap. Washington, D.C. and New York, N.Y.: Economic Policy Institute and Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rothstein, R. (2012). Race and public housing: Revisiting the federal role. Poverty and Race, 21(6), 1–2; 13–17. http://prrac.org/newsletters/novdec2012.pdf.
  51. Rothstein, R., & Miles, K. H. (1995). Where’s the money gone? Changes in the level and composition of education spending. Washington, D.C.: The Economic Policy Institute. http://www.epi.org/page/-/old/books/moneygone.pdf.
  52. Rothstein, R., & Santow, M. (2012). A different kind of choice. Working Paper. Washington, D.C.: The Economic Policy Institute. http://www.epi.org/files/2012/Different_Kind_Of_Choice.pdf.
  53. Rubinowitz, L. S., & Perry, I. (2002). Crimes without punishment: White neighbors’ resistance to black entry. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 92(2), 335–428.Google Scholar
  54. Same work, different unions: Carriers content with legacy of segregation. (2011, June). Postal Record, 8–13. National Association of letter carriers. http://www.nalc.org/news/precord/ArticlesPDF/june2011/06-2011_segregation.pdf.
  55. Sampson, R. J., Sharkey, P., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African American children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 845–852. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710189104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Satter, B. (2009). Family properties: Race, real estate, and the exploitation of black urban America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  57. Schwartz, G. T. (1976). Urban freeways and the interstate system. Southern California Law Review, 49(3), 406–513.Google Scholar
  58. Sharkey, P. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silva, C. (2009). Racial restrictive covenants: Enforcing neighborhood segregation in Seattle. Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project, University of Washington. http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/covenants_report.htm.
  60. Starfield, B. (1997). Health indicators for preadolescent school-age children. In R. M. Hauser, B. V. Brown, & W. R. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being (pp. 95–111). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  61. U.S. Census Bureau (2014). People and households, housing vacancies and homeownership (CPS/HVS), Historical tables. Table 16: Homeownership rates by race and ethnicity of householder:1994 to present. Retrieved June 2, 2014 from http://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/data/histtabs.html.
  62. USCCR (United States Commission on Civil Rights). (1961). Book 4: Housing: 1961 Commission on Civil Rights report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr11961bk4.pdf.
  63. Weaver, R. C. (1948). The negro ghetto. New York, NY: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, J. (2005). Retrofitting ‘Levittown’. Places Journal, 17(2), 46–51. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r57v5j3.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Policy InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations