Skip to main content
Log in

Racial Imagery and Support for Voter ID Laws

  • Published:
Race and Social Problems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research suggests that calls for voter ID laws include racialized appeals and that racial attitudes influence support for such laws. This study uses an experiment to test whether exposure to racial imagery also affects support for voter ID laws. The data come from a survey experiment embedded in the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (N = 1,436) randomizing the race of a voter and poll worker shown to respondents (African American voter and poll worker, white voter and poll worker, or no image). The results show that white respondents who saw an image of an African American voter and poll worker expressed greater support for voter ID laws than those in the no image condition, even after controlling for the significant effects of racial resentment and political ideology. Exposure to an image of a white voter and poll worker did not produce a similar effect. The findings provide new evidence that public opinion about voter ID laws is racialized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., Levin, I., & Stewart, C. (2011). Voter opinions about election reform: Do they support making voting more convenient? Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics and Policy, 10(2), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S. & Schaffner, B. (2013). Guide to the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University [producer] http://cces.gov.harvard.edu.

  • Bentele, K. G., & O’Brien, E. E. (2013). Jim Crow 2.0? Why states consider and adopt restrictive voter access policies. Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), 1088–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and White opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 168–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, M. (1996). “Race coding” and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, F. D., & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 560–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasen, R. L. (2012). The voting wars: From Florida 2000 to the next election meltdown. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnite, L. C. (2007). The politics of voter fraud. Washington, DC: Project Vote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (2002). The racial components of “race‐neutral” crime policy attitudes. Political Psychology, 23(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2012). Broad support for photo ID requirements. http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/11/broad-support-for-photo-id-voting-requirements/ Accessed 29 August 2013.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed. ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. C., & Brewer, P. R. (2013). The foundations of public opinion on voter ID laws: Political predispositions, racial resentment, and information effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(4), 962–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. C., & Davis, D. W. (2011). Reexamining racial resentment: Conceptualization and content. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 634(1), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Brewer.

Appendix: Image Treatments

Appendix: Image Treatments

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, D.C., Brewer, P.R. & Rosenbluth, P.T. Racial Imagery and Support for Voter ID Laws. Race Soc Probl 6, 365–371 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-014-9131-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-014-9131-4

Keywords

Navigation