Demographic Factors Associated with Poverty among American Indians and Alaska Natives
Using data from the American Community Survey for the period 2006–2010, this study provides up-to-date demographic information about poverty among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Our analysis investigates both absolute poverty and relative poverty and distinguishes between four racial categories of American Indians and Alaska Natives including single-race American Indian; biracial white and American Indian; biracial black and American Indian; and other multirace American Indian. We also report results for thirty-seven of the largest self-reported tribal affiliations for single-race American Indians. In general, all of the American Indian and Alaska Native groups have higher levels of absolute and relative poverty rates compared to non-Hispanic whites. The problematic character of poverty among American Indian racial groups is underscored by their substantially higher odds of being poor (relative to non-Hispanic whites), even after statistically taking into account age, gender, education, metropolitan status, and region of residence. Significant variation across the thirty-seven tribal groups is evident, however, with single-race American Indians having the highest level of poverty. This variability suggests the need for future research into the various tribal affiliations and tribal economies.
KeywordsPoverty Relative poverty American Indians Alaska Natives
We thank the Population Research Center of the University of Texas and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center for Health Policy at the University of New Mexico for excellent research support.
- American Indian Higher Education Consortium (2012) Tribal colleges and universities. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from www.aihec.org.
- Census Bureau, U. S. (2004). Census 2000 PHC-T-18. American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Census Bureau, U. S. (2008). A compass for understanding and using American community survey data: What general data users need to know. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Cohen, F. S. (1972). Felix S. Cohen’s handbook of federal Indian Law. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
- Cornell, S., & Kalt, J. P. (1990). Pathways from poverty: Economic development and institution-building in American Indian reservations. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 14(1), 89–125.Google Scholar
- Cornell, S., & Kalt, J. P. (1998). Sovereignty and nation-building: The development challenge in Indian Country today. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 22(3), 187–214.Google Scholar
- Danziger, S. H., Haveman, R. H., & Plotnick, R. D. (1986). Antipoverty policy: Effects on the poor and the nonpoor. In S. H. Danziger & D. H. Weinberg (Eds.), Fighting poverty: What works and what doesn’t (pp. 50–77). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Farley, R. (1996). The new American reality: Who we are, how we got here, where we are going. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Feagin, J. R., Vera, H., & Batur, P. (2000). White racism: The basics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fried, M. (1975). The notion of tribe. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.Google Scholar
- Iceland, J. (2006). Poverty in America (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Macartney, S., Bishaw, A., & Fontenot, K. (2013). Poverty rates for selected detailed race and Hispanic groups by state and place: 2007–2011. American community survey brief 11-17. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. D. (1997). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Meyer, D. R., & Wallace, G. L. (2009). Poverty levels and trends in comparative perspective. In M. Cancian & S. Danziger (Eds.), Changing poverty, changing policies (pp. 35–62). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. (2004). Kinship, family kindreds, and community. In P. J. Deloria & N. Salisbury (Eds.), A companion to American Indian history (pp. 139–153). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Office of the Tribal Miko. (2011). Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Tribal Profile. Choctaw, Mississippi: Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians.Google Scholar
- Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rainwater, L. (1974). What money buys: Inequality and the social meanings of income. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Rainwater, L., & Smeeding, T. M. (2004). Poor kids in a rich country. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Sakamoto, A., & Xie, Y. (2005). The socioeconomic attainments of Asian Americans. In P. G. Min (Ed.), Asian Americans: Contemporary trends and issues (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
- Snipp, C. M. (1989). American Indians: The first of this land. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Spruhan, P. (2006). A legal history of blood quantum in federal Indian law to 1935. South Dakota Law Review, 51(1), 1–50.Google Scholar
- Thornton, R. (1987). American Indian holocaust and survival. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
- Thornton, R. (2005). Native American demographic and tribal survival into the twenty-first century. American Studies, 46, 23–38.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs. (2012a). Indian entities recognized and eligible to receive services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Federal Register, 77(155).Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs. (2012b). Retrieved June 15, 2012 from www.indianaffiars.gov.
- van den Berghe, P. L. (1967). Race and racism: A comparative perspective. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wilkins, D. E. (2002). American Indian politics and the American political system. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar