Toward a Framework for Understanding Forces that Contribute to or Reinforce Racial Inequality

Abstract

For many years social scientists have debated the role of social structure versus culture in explaining the social and economic outcomes of African Americans. The position that one takes often reflects ideological bias. Conservatives tend to emphasize cultural factors whereas liberals pay more attention to structural conditions, with most of the attention devoted to racialist structural factors such as discrimination and segregation. In this article I develop a framework for understanding the formation and maintenance of racial inequality and racial group outcomes that integrates cultural factors with two types of structural forces—those that directly reflect explicit racial bias and those that do not. In so doing, I hope to spark greater interest and dialogue in the research and policy arenas around a more holistic approach to poverty alleviation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    I first discussed the concepts of indirect and direct forces of racial inequality in my contribution to a co-authored introduction to the volume 1 of America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences (2001).

  2. 2.

    See Henderson (1975).

  3. 3.

    See Marshall (1994).

  4. 4.

    Based on an analysis of microdata—the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS)—from Current Population Survey (1962, 1970, 1980, 1990), as well as published data in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2001, 2007).

  5. 5.

    See Nasar (1994) and Rose (1994).

  6. 6.

    See U.S. Bureau of the Census (1988, Table 4; 2003, Table D).

  7. 7.

    See Krueger (1993).

  8. 8.

    See Krueger (1997), Katz (1996), and Schwartzman (1997).

  9. 9.

    See Schwartzman, op. cit.

  10. 10.

    See Galbraith (1998).

  11. 11.

    See Schwartzman (1997). As Alan Krueger (1997) has remarked, “Whatever the role that trade has played in the past, I suspect that trade will place greater pressure on low-skilled workers in the future. The reason for this suspicion is simply that there are a great many unskilled workers in the world who are paid very little. One and a half billion potential workers have left schools before they reached age 13; half the world’s workers leave at age 16 or earlier. When these workers are brought into global economic competition (because of greater openness, more political stability, and greater investment in developing countries), the consequences are unlikely to be positive for low-skilled workers in developed countries.”

  12. 12.

    See Lieberson (1980) and Neckerman (2007).

  13. 13.

    See Schwartzman, op. cit.

  14. 14.

    See Wilson (1987, 1996).

  15. 15.

    See U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1999).

  16. 16.

    See Wilson (1996).

  17. 17.

    See U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1999).

  18. 18.

    A more detailed account of the transportation and networking problems of poor black workers is provided in Wilson (1996).

  19. 19.

    See Levy (1998).

  20. 20.

    According to sociologists Bruce Western and Becky Pettit (2000), the recorded employment gains of low-skilled black men during the economic boom period of the 1990s were the artifact of the major expansion of mass black imprisonment during this period. And, according to their analysis, if the numbers of incarcerated blacks were added to the official employment statistics, the gains would disappear. However, this position has been challenged by University of Wisconsin sociologist Felix Elwert (2008), whose formal quantitative model suggests the opposite conclusion: that incarceration has likely increased rather than decreased low-skilled black unemployment rates.

  21. 21.

    In 2007, a single person with an annual income of $9,800 and a family of four with an annual income of $33,600 were classified as poor.

  22. 22.

    My discussion in this section on the concept of “culture” owes a great deal to the work of Michèle Lamont and Mario Luis Small (2008).

  23. 23.

    For a review of the literature on school tracking, see Free (2004).

  24. 24.

    See Bobo et al. (1997).

  25. 25.

    See Wilson (1996).

  26. 26.

    See Tilly (1998).

  27. 27.

    There is mixed evidence for the outcomes of “acting white” as it applies to education. One of the most well-known studies of this concept was published by Signithia Fordham and John Ogbu in 1986. They studied African American students at a high school in Washington D.C. and concluded that the fear of acting white was one of the major factors undermining student achievement. In contrast, Prudence Carter’s (2003, 2005) studies have not supported the idea that students who avoided “acting white” held lower educational aspirations. Roland Fryer (2006) presents yet another perspective. He found that a high Grade Point Average (GPA) presents a social disadvantage for Hispanics and blacks in integrated schools and public schools, but he saw no such effect in schools that were segregated (80% or more black) or private. He also noticed a marked difference in this effect among black boys and black girls; black boys in public, integrated schools were particularly susceptible to social ostracism as their GPAs increased, and were penalized seven times more than black students (including both genders) overall.

  28. 28.

    See Anderson (1999).

  29. 29.

    See Venkatesh (2006).

  30. 30.

    See Anderson (1999, p. 34).

  31. 31.

    Venkatesh (2006, p. 381).

  32. 32.

    Ibid., p. 377.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., p. 385. For another excellent study of how activities in the underground economy can adversely affect inner-city residents, see Wacquant (1998).

  34. 34.

    See Patterson (2006).

  35. 35.

    Ibid.

  36. 36.

    See Wilson (2009).

  37. 37.

    Ibid. Also see Patterson (2000).

  38. 38.

    See Neckerman (2007).

  39. 39.

    Ibid., p. 174.

  40. 40.

    See Patterson (2006).

  41. 41.

    Ibid.

References

  1. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton (paperback 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bobo, L., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1997). Laisse faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler, antiblack ideology. In S. A. Tuch & J. K. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s (pp. 15–44). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, P. L. (2003). ‘Black’ cultural capital, status positioning, and schooling conflicts for low-income African American youth. Social Problems, 50(1), 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, P. L. (2005). Keepin’ it real: School success beyond Black and White. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elwert, F. (2008). The effects of incarceration on aggregate unemployment rates. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.

  6. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “Burden of ‘Acting White’”. Urban Journal, 18(3), 176–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Free, J. (2004). Race and school tracking: From a social psychological perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA, August 14, 2004.

  8. Fryer, R. G. (2006). ‘Acting White’: The social price paid by the best and brightest minority students. Education Next, Winter, 53–59.

  9. Galbraith, J. K. (1998). Created unequal: The crisis in American pay (p. 9). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson, V. (1975). Race, economics, and public policy. Crisis, 83(Fall), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katz, L. (1996). Wage subsidies for the disadvantaged. Working paper 5679. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  12. Krueger, A. B. (1993). How computers have changed the wage structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984–1989. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 32–60.

  13. Krueger, A. B. (1997). What’s up with wages? Mimeo, Industrial Relations Section. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

  14. Lamont, M., & Small, M. L. (2008, forthcoming). How culture matters for the understanding of poverty: Enriching our understanding. In D. Harris & A. Lin (Eds.), The color of poverty: Why racial and ethnic disparities exist. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  15. Levy, F. (1998). The new dollars and dreams: American incomes and economic change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lieberson, S. (1980). A piece of the pie: Black and White immigrants since 1880. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall, R. (1994). School-to-work processes in the United States. Paper presented at the Carnegie Corporation/Johann Jacobs Foundation, November 3–5, Marbach Castle, Germany.

  18. Nasar, S. (1994). The men in prime of life spend less time working. New York Times, December 1.

  19. Neckerman, K. (2007). Schools betrayed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patterson, O. (2000). Taking culture seriously: A framework and an Afro-American illustration. In L. E. Harrison & S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Culture matters: How values shape human progress (pp. 202–218). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patterson, O. (2006). A poverty of the mind. New York Times, March 26, Sect. 4, p. 13.

  22. Rose, S. J. (1994, October). On shaky ground: Rising fears about incomes and earnings. Research Report No. 94-02. Washington, DC: National Commission for Employment Policy.

  23. Schwartzman, D. (1997). Black unemployment: Part of unskilled unemployment. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smelser, N. J., Wilson, W. J., & Mitchell, F. (Eds.). (2001). America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current population survey. 1962, 1970, 1980, 1990. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS).

  27. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1988). Computer use in the United States: October 1984. In Current population reports, series P-23, no. 155. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

  28. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003). Computer use in the United States: 2003. In Current population reports, series P-23, no. 208. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  29. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2001). Employment and earnings 48/1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). Employment and earnings 54/1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). The state of cities. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Venkatesh, S. A. (2006). Off the books: The underground economy of the urban poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wacquant, L. (1998). Inside the zone: The art of the Hustler in the Black American Ghetto. Theory, Culture, and Society, 15, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Western, B., & Pettit, Becky. (2000). Incarceration and racial inequality in men’s employment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson, W. J. (2009). More than just race: Being Black and poor in the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Julius Wilson.

Additional information

This paper is based on my new book, More than Just Race: Being Black and Poor in the Inner City (2009).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, W.J. Toward a Framework for Understanding Forces that Contribute to or Reinforce Racial Inequality. Race Soc Probl 1, 3–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-009-9004-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social structure
  • Culture
  • Ghetto
  • Poverty
  • Racism