Skip to main content

Determination of ochratoxin A in food: comparison of a stable isotope dilution assay, liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Abstract

Quantitative results for the mycotoxin ochratoxin A (OTA), obtained by a stable isotope dilution assay (SIDA) were compared with two commonly used analytical methods for OTA quantitation. For this, different types of food, such as wheat, coffee, sultanas, and blood sausages, were analyzed. Because results obtained by the SIDA method were closest to the certified contents of an OTA reference material, data obtained by this method were considered as reference data. For liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection, a clean-up by solid phase extraction on silica was found to be necessary, and a correction for recovery had to be performed to match the data from the SIDA experiments. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) strongly overestimated the OTA content in coffee and nutmeg therefore an extract clean-up by immunoaffinity chromatography had to be used to match the SIDA results. Following this sample preparation, ELISA gave correct qualitative and semiquantitative results, and proved to be a suitable screening method. SIDA was also established as a valuable tool to quantify OTA in meat products, when using a clean-up procedure developed recently for blood samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Barricelli M, Schmidt K, Börner B (2010) Bestimmung von Ochratoxin A in Süßholz mittels HPLC-FLD nach Reinigung über Immunoaffinitätssäulen, Dtsch Lebensm Rundsch 106:431–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J, Gareis M (1987) Ochratoxin A in the food-chain, J Vet Med B 34:613–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc M, Pittet A, MunozBox R, Viani R (1998) Behavior of Ochratoxin A during Green Coffee Roasting and Soluble Coffee Manufacture, J Agric Food Chem 46:673–675

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BVL, Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (2010a) Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach § 64 LFGB. Method 15.00-1/1. Beuth, Berlin

  • BVL, Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (2010b) Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach § 64 LFGB. Method 15.00-1/2. Beuth, Berlin

  • European Commission (2006) Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Commission Regulation (EC) 1881/2006

  • Kuiper-Goodman T, Scott PM (1989) Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A, Biomed Environm Sci 2:179–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson K, Möller T (1996) Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Ochratoxin A in Barley, Wheat Bran, and Rye by the AOAC/IUPAC/NMKL Method, J AOAC Int 79:1102–1105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmeier M, Schieberle P, Rychlik M (2004) Quantification of Ochratoxin A in foods by a stable isotope dilution assay using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, J Chromatogr A 1023:57–66

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lütjohann J (2010) Mycotoxins in foods and feeds. Current multimethods for different situations, Dtsch Lebensm Rundsch 106:470–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerus P, Otteneder H (1996) Nachweis und Vorkommen von Ochratoxin A in Wein und Traubensaft, Dtsch Lebensm Rundsch 92:388–390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Märtlbauer E, Terplan G (1988) An enzyme immunoassay for the determination of ochratoxin A in porcine serum, Arch Lebhyg 39:133–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaci L, Palmisano F (2004) Determination of ochratoxin A in foods: state-of-the-art and analytical challenges, Anal Bioanal Chem 378:96–103

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monaci L, Palmisano F, Matrella R, Tantillo G (2005) Determination of ochratoxin A at part-per-trillion level in Italian salami by immunoaffinity clean-up and highperformance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, J Chromatogr A 1090:184–187

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood GM, Patel S, Entwisle AC, Boenke A (1996) Ochratoxin A in wheat: a second intercomparison of procedures, Food Addit Contam 13:519–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ry, 19/4-1).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lindenmeier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenmeier, M., Schieberle, P. & Rychlik, M. Determination of ochratoxin A in food: comparison of a stable isotope dilution assay, liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mycotox Res 27, 115–121 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-010-0084-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-010-0084-1

Keywords

  • ELISA
  • LC-MS-MS
  • Method comparison
  • Ochratoxin A
  • Stable isotope dilution assay