Abstract
Coronoid process hyperplasia is one of a large number of disorders affecting the stomatognathic system and causing mandibular hypomobility. It is characterized by an excessive coronoid process growing to such an extent that it impinges on the posterior portion of the zygomatic bones. Despite the low prevalence of this condition, it should be considered as a possible diagnosis in patients with painless, progressive, and chronic restriction of mouth opening. The diagnosis is based on clinical signs in association with radiographic examinations. Coronoidectomy is the only treatment option for this condition along with early postoperative physical therapy. This article presents the case of a patient with bilateral coronoid process hyperplasia, who was initially diagnosed as having bilateral temporomandibular joint disorders. The patient underwent months of physiotherapy and bite-appliance therapy without any improvement in mouth opening. FinalIy, he was referred to La Timone Hospital for a proper diagnosis and, consequently, effective treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Von Langenbeck B. Angeborene kleinheit der unterkiefer. Langenbeck’s Archiv. 1861;1:451–5.
Marra LM. Bilateral coronoid hyperplasia, a developmental defect. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol. 1983;55:10–3.
Sperling AL. Limitation of mandibular movement secondary to coronoid impingement. J Oral Surg. 1973;31:780–2.
De Leeuw R. Orofacial pain: guidelines for classification, assessment, and management. 4th edn. Chicago: Quintessence Publ. Co.; 2008.
De Boever JA1, Nilner M, Orthlieb JD. Steenks MH. Educational Committee of the European Academy of craniomandibular disorders. Recommendations by the EACD for examination, diagnosis, and management of patients with temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain by the general dental practitioner. J Orofac Pain. 2008;22:268–78.
Rowe NL. Bilateral developmental hyperplasia of the mandibular coronoid process. a report of two cases. Br J Oral Surg. 1963;1:90–104.
Lyon LZ, Sarnat BG. Limited opening of the mouth caused by enlarged coronoid processes: report case. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;67:644–50.
Marra LM. Bilateral coronoid hyperplasia, a developmental defect. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol. 1983;55:10–3.
Tucker MR, et al. Coronoid process hyperplasia causing restricted opening and facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58:130–132.
Gross M, Gavish A, Calderon S, Gazit E. The coronoid process as a cause of mandibular hypomobility—case reports. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:776–81.
Orthlieb Jd, Chossegros C, Cheynet F, Giraudeau A, Mantout B. Cadre diagnostique des Dysfonctionnements de l’Appareil Manducateur (DAM). Information Dentaire. 2004;19:1196–203.
Kubota Y, Takenoshita Y, Takamori K, Kanamoto M, Shirasuna K. Levandoski panographic analysis in the diagnosis of hyperplasia of the coronoid process. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:409–11.
Yuri MC, André LP, Juliana SB, Daniel SC, Leonardo RB, Paulo CR. Coronoid process hyperplasia: an unusual cause of mandibular hypomobility. Braz Dent J. 2012;23:252–5.
Hayter JP, Robertson JM. Surgical access to bilateral coronoid hyperplasia using the bicoronal flap. Br J Oral Surg. 1989;27:487–93.
Ostrofsky MK, Lownie JF. Zygomatico-coronoid ankylosis. J Oral Surg. 1977;35:752–4.
Gerbino G, Bianchi SD, Bernardi M, Berrone S. Hyperplasia of the mandibular coronoid process: long-term follow-up after coronoidectomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997;25:169–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I. Ouni, J.D. Orthlieb, M. Jeany, S. Ammar, and F. Cheynet state that there are no conflicts of interest.
Consent was obtained from all patients identifiable from images or other information within the manuscript. In the case of underage patients, consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ouni, I., Orthlieb, J.D., Jeany, M. et al. Mandibular hypomobility secondary to bilateral coronoid hyperplasia. J. Stomat. Occ. Med. 8 (Suppl 1), 49–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-015-0138-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-015-0138-2