The diverse nature of living apart together relationships: an Italy–France comparison
- 215 Downloads
This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the nature of living apart together (LAT) relationships by focusing on two contrasting family settings: France and Italy. First, we corroborate the view that being “single” in residential terms does not mean being “without a partner” in relationship terms. To assume otherwise would be an erroneous characterisation of more than one quarter of the individuals in both countries. Second, our findings cannot be reconciled with any notion of a simple, uniform, and uni-directional view of LAT relationships. In Italy, LAT relationships are popular in the early phases of the life course, when young adults must often face difficult economic situations as well as social pressure to marry. In France, LAT relationships are more the result of a conscious choice, especially in later phases of the life course. We discuss these results in light of the second demographic transition narrative.
KeywordsLiving apart together relationships Cohabitation Italy France Generations and gender survey
Arnaud Régnier-Loilier acknowledges the Direction des relations internationals et des partenariats (Department of International Relations and Partnerships) of the French National Institute for Demographic Studies (INED) for funding his research visit at the Department of Statistics, Informatics, Applications “Giuseppe Parenti” (DiSIA), of the University of Florence. He also thanks the faculty of DiSIA for their hospitality. Daniele Vignoli acknowledges the financial support provided by the strategic project “Families and Well-being in Italy: Dynamics and Relationships”, financed by the University of Florence (PI: Daniele Vignoli). The French version of the Generations and Gender Survey was funded by INED and INSEE (the French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies), with the support of the ANR (French National Research Agency), the CNAF (French National Family Allowance Fund), the CNAV (French National Old-Age Pension Fund), the DARES (Directorate for the Coordination of Research, Studies and Statistics), the DREES (Directorate for Research and Statistical Studies) and the COR (Pensions Advisory Council).
- Billari, F. C., & Rosina, A. (2004). Italian “latest-late” transition to adulthood: An exploration of its consequences on fertility. Genus, 60(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
- Blossfeld, H.-P., Klizing, F., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Borell, K., & Ghazanfareeon Karlsson, S. (2003). Reconceptualizing intimacy and ageing. Living apart together. In S. Arber, K. Davidson, & J. Ginn (Eds.), Gender and ageing: changing roles and relationships. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Caradec, V. (1997). Forms of conjugal life among the “young elderly”. Population, 9, 47–73.Google Scholar
- Casper, L. M., Braddon, P. D., Di Prete, T. A., Sanders, S., & Smock, P. J. (2008). Rethinking change and variation in unions In Morgan, P. I. et al. (Ed.), Explaining family change (pp. 59–100).Google Scholar
- Casterline, J. B. (2001). Diffusion processes and fertility transition, selected perspectives. Washington, D.C: National Research Council.Google Scholar
- Di Giulio, P. (2007). Living apart together: Insieme, ma separati. In A. Pinnelli, F. Racioppi, & L. Terzera (Eds.), Genere, Famiglia, Salute, Franco Angeli Edizione, (pp. 410–431).Google Scholar
- Duncan, S., Phillips, M., Roseneil, S., Carter, J., & Stoilova, M. (2013b). Living Apart Together: uncoupling intimacy and co-residence. http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/6505/1/6505.pdf.
- Ermisch, J., & Seidler, T. (2009). Living apart together. In M. Brynin & J. Ermisch (Eds.), Changing relationships (pp. 29–43). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ghazanfareeon Karlsson, S., & Borell, K. (2002). Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together. Ageing International, 27(4), 11–26.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality. Stanford UP: Love and Eroticism in Modern Society.Google Scholar
- Haskey, J. (2005). Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: Having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and Living Apart Together (LAT). Population Trends, 122, 35–45.Google Scholar
- Insee. (2013). http://www.insee.fr.
- Istat. (2013). www.istat.it.
- Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason et al. (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Lesthaeghe R., & van de Kaa D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In: Groei en krimp. Mens en Maatschappij, annual book volume, Van Loghum-Slaterus, Deventer: 9–24.Google Scholar
- Livi Bacci, M. (2001). Too few children and too much families. Dedalus, 130(3), 139–155.Google Scholar
- Rault, W. (2009). L’invention du Pacs. Pratiques et symboliques d’une nouvelle forme d’union. Paris: Sciences Po. Les Presses.Google Scholar
- Rault W., Régnier-Loilier A. (2015). Firts cohabiting relationships: recent trends in France, Population & Societies, 521.Google Scholar
- Régnier-Loilier, A. (2009). L’Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles. Du projet international à l’enquête française. In Régnier-Loilier, A. (Ed.), Portraits de familles. L’Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles, Collection « Grandes Enquêtes », Ined, (pp. 31–56).Google Scholar
- Reimondos, A., Evans, A., & Gray, E. (2011). Living-apart-together relationships in Australia. Family Matters, 87, 43–55.Google Scholar
- Sánchez, L., & Goldani, A. M. (2013). The Changing shape of ties in European Families: Profiles and intentions of LAT couples. Paper presented at the 2012 Population Association of America, 3–5 May 2012, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Sansonetti, S. (2009). Social indicators of secularisation in Italy. In B. A. Kosmin & A. Keysar (Eds.), Secularism, women and the state: The Mediterranean World in the 21st Century (pp. 137–154). Hartford: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture.Google Scholar
- Saraceno, C. (2012). Coppie e famiglie. Non è questione di natura. Milano: Feltrinelli Editore.Google Scholar
- Sebille P. (2009). Changing Patterns of Transition to Adulthood. In Régnier-Loilier A. (Ed.), The contemporary family in France. Partnership trajectories and domestic organization, Springer, Ined Population Studies 5: 17–42.Google Scholar
- Turcotte, M. (2013). Living Apart Together, Insights on Canadian Society. March 2013: 1–9.Google Scholar
- van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–57.Google Scholar