An evaluation of the recent fertility changes in Afghanistan: a parity-specific analysis

Abstract

Very limited studies exist on the demography of Afghanistan. Using the only national survey with complete birth history data, the 2010 Afghanistan Mortality Survey, this paper describes the recent fertility changes in the country from a parity-specific perspective. From 1995 to 2009, parity progression ratios, average birth intervals, sex ratio at birth by parity and synthetic lifetime average parity are successively examined. Results show that the progression to higher-order births started to decline in the early 2000s and was accompanied by childbearing postponement. The consistency of the parity analysis is assessed by looking at the sex ratio at birth by parity and comparing the synthetic lifetime average parity to fertility estimates computed from other datasets and/or estimation methods. While the sex ratio at birth indicates strong distortion, casting doubt on the ultimate fertility level, the consistency of the parity-based fertility estimates with other fertility estimates corroborates the fact that misreporting the sex of the child is mainly causing the imbalanced sex ratio at birth and is not significantly affecting the level of fertility. The SPPRs-based analysis provides solid evidence that Afghanistan is in the early stage of its fertility transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    The major surveys conducted in Afghanistan include the 1997, 2000, 2003 and 2010–2011 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), the 2006 Afghanistan Health Survey (HS), the 2003, 2005, and 2007–2008 National Risk and Vulnerabilities Assessment (NRVA), and the 2010 Afghanistan Mortality Survey (AMS). Not all these surveys have collected fertility data.

  2. 2.

    Indeed, applying the P/F ratio method indicates that fertility declined from 8.3 children per woman in the early-mid 1970s to about 6.6–6.9 children per woman in the mid-late 2000s. For the 1970s, the adjusted TFR results from the application of the P/F ratio method to the 1972–1973 Afghanistan Demographic Survey (Trussell and Brown 1979, pp. 141–144, Table 4) and the direct estimate from the 1979 census provided by Khalidi (1989, p. 14). For the 2000s, the adjusted TFR values were computed applying the P/F ratio method to the published data from the 2007–2008 NRVA and 2010 AMS (ICON Institute 2009, pp. 126–128; APHI et al. 2011, pp. 40–45).

  3. 3.

    The Central Statistics Organization (CSO) of Afghanistan provided only the sampling frame for the survey and was not directly involved in the data collection process. Of importance, given its limited involvement in the survey, the CSO does not accept the results of the 2010 AMS (personal communication, Mohammad Sami Nabi, Director, Field Operations and Sampling Department, CSO, 21 May 2012).

  4. 4.

    All computations were made applying the sample weights provided in the ‘individual record’ dataset.

  5. 5.

    The progressions to 10th, 11th and 12th and higher order births are available from the author upon request.

  6. 6.

    To compute birth intervals between each birth order, closed birth intervals for women delivering in a given year were considered.

  7. 7.

    The series of SPPRssim. can also ultimately serve to compute a simulated implied synthetic lifetime average parity (P sim.t ) that can be compared to the alternative fertility estimates derived from other survey datasets and/or from the application of another technique of fertility estimation (an issue that is not covered here).

  8. 8.

    For the 2010 AMS (ASFRs truncated) series, TFRs were computed applying the percentage distribution of the age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) observed in the three-year period before the survey to complete the truncated age-specific fertility rates of the last age group in the 0–4 year period before the survey and of the last two age groups in the 5–9 year period before the survey. The respective reference dates for these TFRs were centred at mid-period (i.e. 2.5 and 5 years preceding the survey for the first and second periods, respectively). The own-children estimates of fertility (for the 2010 AMS) were computed from the household micro data. The own-children method of fertility estimation is a reverse-survival technique for estimating age-specific fertility rates for a number of years preceding a census or household survey (Cho et al. 1986). The fertility estimates were computed using the household members list using the modules MATCHTAB and OWNCH3 in the EASWESPOP—Fertility Estimate Programs (East–West Center 1992). The fertility estimation was performed using the Coale-Demeny West Model, calibrated on the annual life expectancies at birth from the preliminary estimates of the World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. In order to mirror the possible biases in the data (underenumeration, underreporting, misreporting) in the fertility estimates, I kept the underenumeration factors at 1 for both children and women. The estimates obtained from the reverse-survival method were computed from the 2007–2008 NRVA and 2010–2011 MICS single age and sex populations kindly made available from the Central Statistics Organisation in Afghanistan and published in Appendix D of the 2010–2011 MICS report (CSO and UNICEF 2012, pp. 180–183) respectively. The fertility estimation was performed using the Coale-Demeny West Model, calibrated on the annual life expectancies at birth from the preliminary estimates of the World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision and adapting for different mortality levels the spreadsheet given in Timæus and Moultrie (2012).

References

  1. Afghan Public Health Institute, Ministry of Public Health (APHI/MoPH) [Afghanistan], Central Statistics Organization (CSO) [Afghanistan], ICF Macro, Indian Institute of Health Management Research (IIHMR) [India], and World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (WHO/EMRO) [Egypt]. (2011). Afghanistan Mortality Survey 2010. Calverton, MD.

  2. Arnold, F. (1990). Assessment of the quality of birth history data in the demographic and health surveys. In Institute for Resource Development, An assessment of DHS-I data quality (pp. 83–111). Calverton, MD: Institute for Resource Development/Macro Systems, Inc., Methodological Reports no. 1.

  3. Bartlett, L. A., Mawji, S., Whitehead, S., Crouse, C., Dalil, S., Ionete, D., Salama, P, Afghan Maternal Mortality Study Team. (2005). Where giving birth is a forecast of death: Maternal mortality in four districts of Afghanistan, 1999–2002. The Lancet, 365(9462), 864–870.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Central Statistics Organization (CSO) and UNICEF. (2003). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey2003. Afghnistan. Detail table. December 2003. Kabul: CSO and UNICEF Afghanistan Country Office.

  5. Central Statistics Organization (CSO) and UNICEF. (2012). Afghanistan Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 20102011: Final Report. Kabul: Central Statistics Organization (CSO) and UNICEF. Available online (Accessed December 6, 2012) from http://cso.gov.af/Content/files/AMICS-Jun24-2012-FINAL.pdf.

  6. Chahnazarian, A. (1988). Determinants of the sex ratio at birth: Review of recent literature. Social Biology, 35(3–4), 214–235.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, L.-J., Retherford, R. D., & Choe, M. K. (1986). The own-children method of fertility estimation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chu, S., Hill, R., & Graham, S. (1975). National demographic and family guidance study of the settled population of Afghanistan. Volume I: Demography. Washington, DC: Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  9. East-West Center (1992). EASWESPOP: Fertility estimate programs. Honolulu. Available at http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/resources/research/PDFs/manual_fertility_estimate.pdf.

  10. Feeney, G. (1983). Population dynamics based on birth intervals and parity progression. Population Studies, 37(1), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feeney, G., & Yu, J. (1987). Period parity progression measures of fertility in China. Population Studies, 41(1), 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinde, A. (1998). Demographic methods. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., McDonald, P., & Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. (2006). The Iranian fertility decline, 1981–1999: An application of the synthetic parity progression ratio method. Population-E, 61(5–6), 701–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ICON Institute. (2009). National risk and vulnerability assessment 2007/8. A profile of Afghanistan. Main report, Kabul: Jehoon Printing Press.

  15. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and UNICEF. (2006). Best estimates of social indicators for children in Afghanistan, 1990–2005. Kabul: Central Statistics Office.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khalidi, N. A. (1989). Demographic Profile of Afghanistan, International Population Dynamics Program, Department of Demography, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Research Note no. 106 (December 14, 1989).

  17. Lerch, M. (2013). Fertility decline during Albania’s societal crisis and its subsequent consolidation. European Journal of Population, Online First article, published January 22, 2013.

  18. Ministry of Public Health (Transitional Islamic Government of Afghanistan) (2003). Basic package of health services for Afghanistan, Kabul, March 2003/1382.

  19. Ministry of Public Health, John Hopkins University and Indian Institute of Health Management Research. (2008). Afghanistan Health Survey 2006. Estimates of priority health indicators for rural Afghanistan. Kabul.

  20. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1987). Period parity progression ratios and birth intervals in England and Wales, 1941–1971: A synthetic life table analysis. Population Studies, 41(2), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pullum, T. W. (2004). Natality. Measures based on censuses and surveys. In J. S. Siegel & D. A. Swanson (Eds), The methods and materials of demography, 2nd ed. (pp. 407–428). Amsterdam: Elsevier, Academic Press.

  22. Pullum, T. W. (2006). An assessment of age and date reporting in the Demographic and Health Surveys, 1985–2003. Calverton, MD: Demographic and Health Surveys Project, ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spoorenberg, T. (2009). The impact of the political and economic transition on fertility and family formation in Mongolia: A synthetic parity progression ratios analysis. Asian Population Studies, 5(2), 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Spoorenberg, T. (2010). Fertility transition in India between 1977 and 2004. Analysis using parity progression ratios. Population-E, 65(2), 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spoorenberg, T., & Dommaraju, P. (2012). Regional fertility transition in India: An analysis using synthetic parity progression ratios. International Journal of Population Research, Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 358409.

  26. Timæus, I. M., & Moultrie, T. A. (2012). Estimation of fertility by reverse survival. In T. A. Moultrie et al. (Eds). Tools for demographic estimation. Paris: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. Available online (Accessed December 10, 2012) http://demographicestimation.iussp.org/content/reverse-survival-methods.

  27. Trussell, J., & Brown, E. (1979). A close look at the demography of Afghanistan. Demography, 16(1), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Viswanathan, K., Becker, S., Hansen, P. M., Kumar, D., Kumar, B., Niayesh, H., et al. (2010). Infant and under-five mortality in Afghanistan: Current estimates and limitations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(8), 576–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Spoorenberg.

Additional information

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spoorenberg, T. An evaluation of the recent fertility changes in Afghanistan: a parity-specific analysis. J Pop Research 30, 133–149 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-013-9107-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fertility
  • Parity
  • Data quality
  • Estimation
  • Afghanistan