Skip to main content

Participation in different types of volunteering at young, middle and older adulthood

Abstract

Around 35 % of Australian adults volunteer. It has been found that participation in volunteering varies with life course stage: people tend to participate less in early adulthood, which has been referred to as a ‘demographically dense’ period, and more in middle adulthood, which has been characterized as a more stable period of life. This paper extends this research to investigate the types of organizations for which people volunteer at different life course stages. This paper uses data from the Negotiating the Life Course project (2003 and 2006) to examine participation in volunteering for different types of organizations. The focus is on the type of organizations for which people volunteer and how that differs in young, middle and older adulthood. There are three dominant types of organizations that people volunteer for: welfare and community, sport and recreation, and education and training, and volunteering with each of these groups varies with a person’s life course stage. Younger adults tend to be more likely to volunteer for religious groups. People in middle adulthood, and particularly those with school-aged children, tend to volunteer in sport and recreation groups and education and training organizations, and volunteering with welfare, community and health organizations is dominant in older adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Survey weights adjust for sampling procedure.

  2. This list overlaps with the International Classification of Non-Profit Organisations (ICNPO) in the United Nations Handbook on Non-Profit Institutions in the System of National Accounts (2003). Since the 11 groups are listed in the NLC Survey Questionnaire, it is not possible to regroup them into the categories of the ICNPO. The main differences between this list and the ICNPO major groupings are (1) culture and arts are grouped separately from sports and recreation whereas in the ICNPO they are all in major Group 1 as Culture and Recreation; (2) emergency services are grouped separately from welfare and community services whereas in the ICNPO they are all in major Group 4 as Social Services; (3) the ICNPO has a group called Philanthropic intermediaries and voluntarism promotion (Group 8), which is not listed in the NCL Survey and would be included in the ‘Other’ category; and (4) the ICNPO has a major group called Development and Housing (Group 6) which includes employment and training and social and community development. In the NLC Survey, training is included with ‘Education’, and social and community development is included in ‘Welfare/community’’. Aside from these differences, the other groups listed in the NLC survey questionnaire are similar to the other major groups in the ICNPO.

  3. It is very rare that this type of transition analysis can be examined for volunteering. Volunteering information is rarely collected in longitudinal surveys, and we know of no other longitudinal survey which collects information on type of organization volunteered for. This analysis can only be conducted between Wave 3 and Wave 4 because the questions on volunteering are collected differently in earlier waves.

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2007). Voluntary work, Australia 2007. Cat. No. 4441.0. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2008). Australian social trends 2008, Article: Voluntary Work. Cat. No. 4102.0. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2010). Volunteers in sport. Cat. No. 4440.55.001. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011a). Voluntary work, Australia 2010. Cat. No. 4441.0. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011b). 2010 General social survey: Summary results, Australia. Cat. No. 41590DO008. Canberra.

  • Battaglia, A., & Metzer, J. (2000). Older adults and volunteering: A symbiotic association. Australian Journal of Volunteering, 5(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Volunteering in the United States—2011. News release. Available at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/volun_02222012.pdf.

  • Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butrica, B. A., Johnson, R. W., & Zedlewski, S. R. (2009). Volunteer dynamics of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 64B(5), 644–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolnicar, S., & Randle, M. (2007). What motivates which volunteers? Psychographic heterogeneity among volunteers in Australia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18, 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2004). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.) Handbook of the life course, New York: Springer. (pp. 3–19).

  • Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Department of (FaHCSIA). (2008). Volunteering in Australia changing patterns in voluntary work 19952006, Canberra.

  • Goss, K. (1999). Volunteering and the long civic generation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 378–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2001). Measurement issues in surveys of giving and volunteering and strategies applied in the design of Canada’s National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hank, K., & Erlinghagen, M. (2009). Dynamics of volunteering in older Europeans. The Gerontologist, 50(2), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Ferraro, K. (2006). Volunteering in middle and later life: Is health a benefit, barrier or both? Social Forces, 85(1), 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M., & Hocking, S. (2000). The decline of volunteering and Australia’s highly committed volunteers. Paper presented to the Australian Social Science Academy Workshop: Volunteering in the New Millennium, 10–11 February.

  • McDonald, C., & Warburton, J. (2001). The invisibility of volunteers and the need for research: An Australian perspective. Voluntary Action, 4(1), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P., Evans, A., Baxter, J., & Gray, E. (2000). Negotiating the life course survey experience. NLC Discussion Paper No.001. Canberra: ANU.

  • Moen, P., & Fields, V. (2002). Midcourse in the United States: Does unpaid community participation replace paid work? Ageing International, 27(3), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, M. A., Herzog, A. R., & House, J. S. (1999). Volunteering and mortality among older adults: Findings from a national sample. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B(3), S173–S180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle, S., Johnson, M. K., & Mortimer, J. T. (2004). Volunteerism during the transition to adulthood: A life course perspective. Social Forces, 82(3), 1123–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyx, J., & Warburton, J. (2003). Volunteering and health among older people: A review. Australian Journal of Ageing, 22(2), 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotolo, T. (2000). A time to join, a time to quit: The influence of life cycle transitions on voluntary association membership. Social Forces, 78(3), 1133–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotolo, T., & Wilson, J. (2006). Substitute or complement? Spousal influence on volunteering, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settersen, R. (2009). It takes two to tango: The (un)easy dance between life-course sociology and life-span psychology. Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K. (1995). Life-cycle transitions and political participation: The case of marriage. American Political Science Review, 89, 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundeen, R. A. (1990). Family life course status and volunteer behaviour: Implications for the single parent. Sociological Perspectives, 33(4), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F. (2006). What resources are needed for volunteerism? A life course perspective, Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25(5), 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Willigen, M. (2000). Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course. Journal of Gerontology, 55B(5), S308–S318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volunteering Australia. (2005). Definitions and principles of volunteering, Information Sheet. Available at http://www.volunteeringaustralia.org/files/AOAL2F8K3S/VA%20Definitions%20and%20Principles%20June%202005.pdf.

  • Volunteering Australia. (2007). National survey of Australian volunteers of diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Available at http://www.volunteeringaustralia.org/files/BRTVP4DHB8/CALD%20National%20Survey%20final%20report%20with%20cover.pdf.

  • Warburton, J., & Cordingley, S. (2004). The contemporary challenges of volunteering in an ageing Australia. Australian Journal of Volunteering, 9(2), 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, J., Le Brocque, R., & Rosenman, L. (1998). Older people—the reserve army of volunteers? An analysis of volunteerism among older Australians. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 46(3), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Janoski, T. (1995). The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion, 56(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappala, G., & Burrell, T. (2002). Understanding the factors associated with volunteer commitment: A case study of volunteers in community services. Third Sector Review, 8(2), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The NLC survey is funded by the Australian Research Council (A7990570, DP0208305, DP0663459, DP0987834).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edith Gray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, E., Khoo, SE. & Reimondos, A. Participation in different types of volunteering at young, middle and older adulthood. J Pop Research 29, 373–398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-012-9092-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-012-9092-7

Keywords

  • Volunteering
  • Civic participation
  • Life course
  • Welfare and community
  • Sport and recreation
  • Education and training