Skip to main content

Table 4 Relative weights and Consistency Ratios (CR) for not signalized pedestrian crossings (NSPC) and signalized pedestrian crossings (SPC)

From: A methodology to assess pedestrian crossing safety

CRITERIA Weights Weights CR CR
(NSPC) (SPC) NSPC SPC
Perceived Safety    0,024 0,004
Spatial and Temporal Design   20% 0,014 0,019
Roadway width 15% 7%   
Pedes trian-vehicles conflict points 42% 12%   
Painted or rais ed pedes trian refuge is lands     
(als o des igned for dis abled people) 43% 14%   
Pedes trian traffic light 22%   
Green phas e efficiency 18%   
Am ber phas e efficiency 14%   
Red phas e duration 7%   
Pedes trian Countdown s ignal 6%   
Day-time visibility 24% 22% 0,034 0,030
Minim um approach s ight dis tance 48% 48%   
Pedes trian cros s ing s igns vis ibility 17% 18%   
Pavem ent m arkings vis ibility 21% 20%   
Pedes trian cros s ing width 5% 5%   
Traffic direction s ignalization 9% 9%   
Night-time visibility 42% 41% 0,004 0,006
Light conditions 47% 42%   
Minim um approach s ight dis tance 29% 34%   
Pedes trian cros s ing s igns /s ignal vis ibility 11% 11%   
Pavem ent m arkings vis ibility 13% 13%   
Accessibility 16% 17% 0,004 0,003
Dropped kerbs 26% 22%   
Tactile paving 19% 16%   
Audible s ignals 20%   
Pres ence of obs tacles 38% 3%   
Kerb width 17% 12%