PalZ

pp 1–18 | Cite as

New turtle remains from the Late Cretaceous of Monte Alto-SP, Brazil, including cranial osteology, neuroanatomy and phylogenetic position of a new taxon

  • Gabriel S. Ferreira
  • Fabiano V. Iori
  • Guilherme Hermanson
  • Max C. Langer
Research Paper

Abstract

A high diversity of land vertebrates is known from the Late Cretaceous deposits of the Bauru Basin, Brazil, including at least five turtle taxa, all belonging to the clade Podocnemidoidae. Some of the richest fossil sites of this basin are in the area of Monte Alto, which yielded several squamate, dinosaur, and crocodyliform taxa. Yet, the single turtle reported so far from this area was only briefly described. Here, we further describe that specimen, a complete but very crushed shell, as well as a partial skull, both found in outcrops of the Adamantina Formation. Comparison of the shell to other podocnemidoid taxa reveals its affinities to Roxochelys wanderleyi, a turtle originally described from that same stratigraphic unit. The comparative description of the skull and its inclusion in a phylogenetic study, supports the proposal of a new taxon, Yuraramirim montealtensis, representing a lineage (Peiropemydidae) so far known only from the Marília Formation of the Bauru Basin and the early Paleocene of Bolivia. The digitally reconstructed endocast and inner ear of the new taxon were also described, as not previously done for a fossil pleurodire.

Keywords

Podocnemidoidae Pleurodira Inner ear Neuroanatomy Carotid circulation Late Cretaceous Adamantina Formation Brazil 

Kurzfassung

Die Diversität von Landwirbeltieren aus den spät-kretazischen Ablagerungen des Bauru-Beckens in Brasilien ist hoch. Zu den bekannten Taxa zählen mindestens fünf Schildkröten, die allesamt der Gruppe der Podocnemidoidae angehören. Einige der fossilreichsten Fundstellen des Beckens befinden sich in der Monte Alto-Gegend, in der mehrere Taxa von Squamaten, Dinosauriern und Crocodyliformen gefunden worden sind. Die einzige aus dieser Gegend dokumentierte Schildkröte wurde bisher allerdings nicht umfangreich beschrieben. In der vorliegenden Arbeit beschreiben wir jenes Fundstück, ein komplett aber verdrückt erhaltener Panzer, sowie ein unvollständiger Schädel, die beide aus den Aufschlüssen der Adamantina-For-mation stammen. Vergleiche mit Panzermaterial anderer podocnemidoider Schildkröten lassen Affinitäten zu Roxochelys wanderleyi erkennen, welche ursprünglich aus derselben stratigraphischen Einheit beschrieben wurde. Die vergleichende Beschreibung und phylogenetische Analyse des Schädels rechtfertigen die Benennung eines neuen Taxons, Yuraramirim montealtensis. Dieses Taxon gehört zu einer Gruppe (Peiropemydidae), die bisher nur aus der Marília-Formation des Bauru-Beckens und des frühen Paläozäns von Bolivien bekannt war. Zudem werden der digitale Steinkern sowie das Innenohr des neuen Taxons beschrieben, was bisher für keine fossile pleurodire Schildkröte getan worden war.

Schlüsselwörter

Podocnemidoidae Pleurodira Innenohr Neuroanatomie Karotiden Adamantina-Formation Oberkreide Basilien 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank A. C. Arruda-Campos (in memoriam) for providing the material for study, L. E. Sabino (from the FOAr-UNESP), for the micro-CT scanning, T. S. Fachini for sharing information about the fossil vertebrate record of the Monte Alto region, and the crew involved in field activities, in particular C. A. Francisco, D. Silva, and T. S. Fachini. We also acknowledge the reviewers, W.G. Joyce and I. Danilov, and editor-in-chief of PalZ, Mike Reich, for insightful comments that very much improved the manuscript, and E. Cadena and P. S. R. Romano for useful suggestions on an earlier version of it. This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) scholarships to GSF (grant numbers 2014/25379-5 and 2016/03934-2) and GH (grant numbers 2016/03373-0 and 2016/17116-0), and research funding to MCL (2014/03825-3). We acknowledge S. Evers for translating the abstract and keywords to German.

Supplementary material

12542_2017_397_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1033 kb)

References

  1. Albrecht, P.W. 1976. The cranial arteries of turtles and their evolutionary significance. Journal of Morphology 149: 159–182.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarenga, H., and W.R. Nava. 2005. Aves enantiornithes do Cretáceo superior da Formação Adamantina do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Congresso Latinoamericano de Paleontologia de Vertebrados 2: 20. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  3. Andrade, M.B., and R.J. Bertini. 2008. A new Sphagesaurus (Mesoeucrocodylia: Notosuchia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Monte Alto City (Bauru Basin, Brazil), and a revision of the Sphagesauridae. Historical Biology 20: 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Báez, A.M., R.O. Gómez, L.C.B. Ribeiro, A.G. Martinelli, V.P.A. Teixeira, and M.L.F. Ferraz. 2012. The diverse Cretaceous neobatrachian fauna of South America: Uberabatrachus carvalhoi, a new frog from the Maastrichtian Marília Formation, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Gondwana Research 22: 1141–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batezelli, A. 2015. Continental systems tracts of the Brazilian Cretaceous Bauru Basin and their relationship with the tectonic and climatic evolution of South America. Basin Research 27: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertini, R.J., L.G. Marshall, M. Gayet, and P.M. Brito. 1993. Vertebrate faunas from the Adamantina and Marília (Upper Bauru Group, Late Cretaceous, Brazil) in their stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic context. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 188: 71–101.Google Scholar
  7. Bertini, R.J., R.M. Santucci, and A.C. Arruda-Campos. 2001. Titanossauros (Sauropoda: Saurischia) no Cretáceo Superior continental (Formação Marília, Membro Echaporã) de Monte Alto, estado de São Paulo, e correlação com formas associadas do Triângulo Mineiro. Geociências 20 (1): 93–103. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  8. Bittencourt, J.S., and M.C. Langer. 2011. Mesozoic dinosaurs from Brazil and their biogeographic implications. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 83: 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinkman, D., M. Hart, H. Jamniczky, and M. Colbert. 2006. Nichollsemys baieri gen. et sp. nov., a primitive chelonioid turtle from the Late Campanian of North America. Paludicol 5 (4): 111–124.Google Scholar
  10. Brito, R.J., C.R.L. Amaral, and L.P. Machado. 2006. A ictiofauna do Grupo Bauru, Cretáceo Superior da Bacia Bauru, Sudeste do Brasil. In Paleontologia de Vertebrados: Grandes Temas e Contribuições Científicas, eds. V. Gallo, P.M. Brito, H.M. Silva, and F.J. Figueroa, 133–143. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Interciência. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  11. Broin, F. de. 1971. Une espèce nouvelle de tortue pleurodire (? Roxochelys vilavilensis n. sp.) dans le Crétacé supérieur de Bolivie. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 7 (3–4): 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broin, F. de. 1988. Les tortues et le Gondwana. Examen des rapports entre le fractionnement du Gondwana au Crétacé et la dispersion géographique des tortues pleurodires á partir du Crétacé. Studia Geologica Salmanticensia. Studia Palaeocheloniologica 2: 103–142.Google Scholar
  13. Broin, F. de. 1991. Fossil turtles from Bolivia. In Fosiles y facies de Bolivia, vol. 1: Vertebrados, ed. R. Suarez-Soruco, 509–527. Santa Cruz: Centro de Tecnología Petrolera (= Revista Técnica de Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales de Bolívia 12).Google Scholar
  14. Cadena, E. 2015. A global phylogeny of Pelomedusoides turtles with new material of Neochelys franzeni Schleich, 1993 (Testudines, Podocnemididae) from the middle Eocene, Messel Pit, of Germany. PeerJ 3: e1221.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cadena, E.A., and C.A. Jaramillo. 2015. The first fossil skull of Chelus (Pleurodira: Chelidae, Matamata turtle) from the early Miocene of Colombia. Palaeontologia Electronica 18.2.32A: 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Cadena, E.A., D.T. Ksepka, C.A. Jaramillo, and J.I. Bloch. 2012. New pelomedusoid turtles from the late Palaeocene Cerrejón Formation of Colombia and their implications for phylogeny and body size evolution. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 10 (2): 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carvalho, I.S., F.M. Vasconcellos, and S.A.S. Tavares. 2007. Montealtosuchus arrudacamposi, a new peirosaurid crocodile (Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Late Cretaceous Adamantina Formation of Brazil. Zootaxa 1607: 35–46.Google Scholar
  18. Cope, E.D. 1864. On the limits and relations of the Raniformes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 1864: 181–183.Google Scholar
  19. Dias-Brito, D., E.A. Musacchio, J.C. de Castro, M.S.A.S. Maranhão, J.M. Suárez, and R. Rodrigues. 2001. Grupo Bauru: uma unidade continental do Cretáceo no Brasil-concepções baseadas em dados micropaleontológicos, isotópicos e estratigráficos. Revue de Paléobiologie 20: 245–304.Google Scholar
  20. Dumont Junior, M.V. 2013. Um novo podocnemídeo fossil de grande porte da Formação Solimões (Mioceno–Plioceno), Acre, Brasil e as relações filogenéticas entre os Podocnemidae. Unpublished M.S. thesis. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  21. Fachini, T.S., and Hsiou, A.S. 2011. Presence of an “anilioid” snake from the Late Cretaceous of Adamantina Formation, Brazil. In 4th congreso latinoamericano de paleontología de vertebrados, p. 13.Google Scholar
  22. Fachini, T.S., and Iori, F.V. 2009. Primeiro registro fóssil de Squamata na região do município de Monte Alto, estado de São Paulo (Bacia Bauru, Cretáceo Superior). In XXI congresso brasileiro de paleontologia, p. 172. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  23. Fernandes, L.A., and A.M. Coimbra. 1996. A Bacia Bauru (Cretaceo superior, Brasil). Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 68 (2): 195–205. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  24. Ferreira, G.S., A.D. Rincón, A. Solórzano, and M.C. Langer. 2015. The last marine pelomedusoids (Testudines: Pleurodira): a new species of Bairdemys and the paleoecology of Stereogenyina. PeerJ 3: e1063.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. França, M.A.G., and M.C. Langer. 2005. A new freshwater turtle (Reptilia, Pleurodira, Podocnemidae) from the Upper cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Geodiversitas 27 (3): 391–411.Google Scholar
  26. França, M.A.G., and M.C. Langer. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of the Bauru Group turtles (Late Cretaceous of south-central Brazil). Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 9 (3): 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de la Fuente, M.S. 2003. Two new pleurodiran turtles from the Portezuelo Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Northern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology 77 (3): 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaffney, E.S. 1977. An endocranial cast of the side-necked turtle, Bothremys, with a new reconstruction of the palate. American Museum Novitiates 2639: 1–12.Google Scholar
  29. Gaffney, E.S. 1979. Comparative cranial morphology of recent and fossil turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 164 (2): 65–376.Google Scholar
  30. Gaffney, E.S. 1982. Cranial morphology of the baenid turtles. American Museum Novitiates 2737: 1–22.Google Scholar
  31. Gaffney, E.S., P.A. Meylan, R.C. Wood, E. Simons, and D.A. Campos. 2011. Evolution of the side-necked turtles: the family Podocnemididae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 350: 1–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaffney, E.S., H. Tong, and P.A. Meylan. 2006. Evolution of the side-necked turtles: the families Bothremydidae, Euraxemydidae, and Araripemydidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 300: 1–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gaffney, E.S., and R. Zangerl. 1968. A revision of the chelonian genus Bothremys (Pleurodira: Pelomedusidae). Fieldiana: Geology 16: 193–239.Google Scholar
  34. Georgi J.A., and Sipla J.S. 2008. Comparative and functional anatomy of balance in aquatic reptiles and birds. In Sensory evolution on threshold: adaptations on secondarily aquatic vertebrates, eds. J.G.M. Thewissen, S. Nummela, 233–256. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Goloboff, P.A., J.S. Farris, M. Kallerjö, B. Oxelman, M. Ramírez, and C. Szumik. 2003. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19: 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goloboff, P.A., J.S. Farris, and K.C. Nixon. 2008. TNT, a free-program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hermanson, G., G.S. Ferreira, and M.C. Langer. 2016. The largest Cretaceous podocnemidoid turtle (Pleurodira) revealed by an isolated plate from the Bauru Basin, south-central Brazil. Historical Biology 29 (6): 833–840.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2016.1248434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hopson, J.A. 1979. Paleoneurology. In Biology of the reptilia, vol. 9, ed. C. Gans, 39–146. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Iori, F.V., and I.S. Carvalho. 2009. Morrinhosuchus luziae, um novo Crocodylomorpha Notosuchia da Bacia Bauru, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 39: 717–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iori, F.V., and Carvalho, I.S. 2010. Ocorrência de um quelônio de grande porte no município de Monte Alto, estado de São Paulo, Brasil (Bacia Bauru, Cretáceo Superior). In VII simpósio brasileiro de paleontologia de vertebrados, p. 44. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  41. Iori, F.V., and I.S. Carvalho. 2011. Caipirasuchus paulistanus, a new sphagesaurid (Crocodylomorpha, Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Adamantina Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Turonian-Santonian), Bauru Basin, Brazil. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31: 1255–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iori, F.V., and K.L. Garcia. 2012. Barreirosuchus franciscoi, um novo Crocodylomorpha Trematochampsidae da Bacia Bauru, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 42: 397–410.Google Scholar
  43. Joyce, W.G. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of Mesozoic Turtles. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 48: 3–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Joyce, W.G., T.R. Lyson, and J.I. Kirkland. 2016. An early bothremydid (Testudines, Pleurodira) from the Late Cenomanian of Utah, North America. PeerJ 4: e2502.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kischlat, E.-E. 1994. Observações sobre Podocnemis elegans Suarez (Chelonii, Pleurodira, Podocnemididae) do Neocreatáceo do Brasil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 17: 345–351. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  46. Kischlat, E.-E. 2015. A new pleurodire turtle (Chelonii) from Adamantina Formation (Bauru Group), Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. PeerJ (preprints) 3: e1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kischlat, E.E., and S.A.K. Azevedo. 1991. Sobre novos restos de quelônios podocnemidios do Grupo Bauru, estado de São Paulo, Brasil. XII Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia 12: 25–26. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  48. Lapparent de Broin, F. 2000. The oldest prepodocnemidid turtle (Chelonii, Pleurodira), from the Early Cretaceous, Ceará State, Brasil, and its environment. Treballs del Museu de Geologia de Barcelona 9: 43–95.Google Scholar
  49. Lipka, T.R., F. Therrien, D.B. Weishampel, H.A. Jamniczky, W.G. Joyce, M.W. Colbert, and D.B. Brinkman. 2006. A new turtle from the Arundel clay facies (Potomac Formation, Early Cretaceous) of Maryland, U.S.A. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26 (2): 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lively, J.R. 2015. A new species of baenid turtle from the Kaiparowits Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Campanian) of southern Utah. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 35 (6): e1009084.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2015.1009084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martinelli, A.G., and W.R. Nava. 2011. A new squamate lizard from the Upper Cretaceous Adamantina Formation (Bauru Group), São Paulo State, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 83: 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mautner, A.-K., A.E. Latimer, U. Fritz, and T.M. Scheyer. 2017. An updated description of the osteology of the pancake tortoise Malacochersus tornieri (Testudines: Testudinidae) with special focus on intraspecific variation. Journal of Morphology 278 (3): 321–333.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Méndez, A.H., F.E. Novas, and F.V. Iori. 2014. New record of abelisauroid theropods from the Bauru Group (Upper Cretaceous), São Paulo State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 17 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Menegazzo, M.C., R.J. Bertini, and F.F. Manzini. 2015. A new turtle from the Upper Cretaceous Bauru Group of Brazil, updated phylogeny and implications for age of the Santo Anastácio Formation. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Menegazzo, M.C., O. Catuneanu, and H.K. Chang. 2016. The South American retroarc foreland system: the development of the Bauru Basin in the back-bulge province. Marine and Petroleum Geology 73: 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meylan, P.A., E.S. Gaffney, and D.A. Campos. 2009. Caninemys, a new side-necked turtle (Pelomedusoides: Podocnemididae) from the Miocene of Brazil. American Museum Novitiates 3639: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Müller, J., J. Sterli, and J. Anquetin. 2011. Carotid circulation in amniotes and its implications for turtle relationships. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 261: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pacheco, J.A. 1913. Notas sobre a geologia do Vale do Rio Grande, a partir da foz do Rio Pardo até a sua confluência com o Rio Paranahyba. In Exploração do Rio Grande e de seus afluentes, ed. J. Dourados, 33–38. São Paulo: Comissão de Geografia e Geologia. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  59. Paulina-Carabajal, A.P., J. Sterli, J. Müller, and A. Hilger. 2013. Neuroanatomy of the marine Jurassic turtle Plesiochelys etalloni (Testudinata, Plesiochelyidae). PLoS ONE 8 (7): e69264.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paulina-Carabajal, A., J. Sterli, J. Georgi, S.F. Poropat, and B.P. Kear. 2017. Comparative neuroanatomy of extinct horned turtles (Meiolaniidae) and extant terrestrial turtles (Testudinidae), with comments on the palaeobiological implications of selected endocranial features. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society zlw024: 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlw024.Google Scholar
  61. Pinheiro, A.E.P., R.J. Bertini, M.A. Andrade, and R.G. Martins Neto. 2008. A new specimen of Stratiotosuchus maxhechti (Baurusuchidae, Crocodyliformes) from the Adamantina Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 11 (1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Price, L.I. 1953. Os quelônios da Formação Bauru, Cretáceo terrestre do Brasil Meridional. Boletim da Divisão de Geologia e Mineralogia Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral 147: 1–34. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  63. Rabi, M., H. Tong, and G. Botfalvai. 2012. A new species of the side-necked turtle Foxemys (Pelomedusoides: Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Hungary and the historical biogeography of the Bothremydini. Geological Magazine 149: 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rabi, M., C.-F. Zhou, O. Wings, S. Ge, and W.G. Joyce. 2013. A new xinjiangchelyid turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the evolution of the basipterygoid process in Mesozoic turtles. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 203.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Romano, P.S.R., G.R. Oliveira, S.A.K. Azevedo, A.W.A. Kellner, and D.A. Campos. 2013. New information about Pelomedusoides (Testudines: Pleurodira) from the Cretaceous of Brazil. In Morphology and evolution of turtles (vertebrate paleobiology and palaeoanthropology), eds. Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. D. Brinkman, P. Holroyd, and J. Gardner, 267–274. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Romano, P.S.R., and S.A.K. Azevedo. 2007. Morphometric analysis of the Upper Cretaceous Brazilian side-necked turtle Bauruemys elegans (Suárez, 1969) (Pleurodira, Podocnemididae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 65 (4): 395–402.Google Scholar
  67. Santucci, R.M., and A.C. Arruda-Campos. 2011. A new sauropod (Macronaria, Titanosauria) from the Adamantina Formation, Bauru Group, Upper Cretaceous of Brazil and the phylogenetic relationships of Aeolosaurini. Zootaxa 3085: 1–33.Google Scholar
  68. Staesche, K. 1937. Podocnemis brasiliensis n. sp. aus der Oberen Kreide Brasiliens. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beilageband 77: 291–309.Google Scholar
  69. Sterli, J., J. Müller, J. Anquetin, and A. Hilger. 2010. The parabasisphenoid complex in Mesozoic turtles and the evolution of the testudinate basicranium. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 47: 1337–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Suárez, J.M. 1969. Um quelônio da Formação Bauru. XXIII Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Anais 3: 168–176. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  71. Tavares, S.A.S., F.R. Branco, and R.M. Santucci. 2014. Theropod teeth from the Adamantina Formation (Bauru Group, Upper Cretaceous), Monte Alto, São Paulo, Brazil. Cretaceous Research 50: 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tong, H., and E. Buffetaut. 1996. A new genus and species of pleurodiran turtle from the Cretaceous of southern Morocco. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 199: 133–150.Google Scholar
  73. Walsh, S.A., P.M. Barrett, A.C. Milner, G. Manley, and L.M. Witmer. 2009. Inner ear is a proxy for deducing auditory capability and behaviour in reptiles and birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B: Biological Sciences) 276: 1355–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wever, E.G. 1978. The reptile ear. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wyneken, J. 2001. The anatomy of sea turtles. Miami: US Department of Commerce. (NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-470).Google Scholar
  76. Zangerl, R. 1960. The vertebrate fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. V. An advanced cheloniid sea turtle. Fieldiana: Geology Memoirs 3 (5): 281–312.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paläontologische Gesellschaft 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Paleontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (HEP)Eberhard Karls UniversitätTübingenGermany
  3. 3.Fachbereich GeowissenschaftenEberhard Karls Universität TübingenTübingenGermany
  4. 4.Museu de Paleontologia “Prof. Antonio Celso de Arruda Campos”Centro de Artes, Praça do CentenárioMonte AltoBrazil
  5. 5.Museu de Paleontologia “Pedro Candolo”UchoaBrazil
  6. 6.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations