Abstract
Cavioidea sensu stricto (Cavioidea s.s.) is one of the most divergent lineages within the South American Hystricognathi, and is currently represented by cavies, maras (Caviidae), and capybaras (Hydrochoeridae). Caviids and hydrochoerids have been interpreted as forming the crown group, whereas the stem group of Cavioidea s.s. is formed by “Eocardiidae”, a paraphyletic group recorded in the late Oligocene to middle Miocene, mainly in Patagonia. One of the most interesting features of Cavioidea s.s. is the record of evolution of hypsodonty, which develops relatively slowly compared to other groups of caviomorphs, enabling this process to be followed in the fossil record. Phanomys is recorded in Patagonia during the late early Miocene, and since its description this genus has been considered close to euhypsodont genera. The objective of this paper is to: (1) report new material of Phanomys; (2) re-describe the two species of the genus; (3) determine the phylogenetic position of Phanomys among Cavioidea s.s. by morphological cladistic analysis; and (4) explore the sequence of appearance of characters related to the origin of euhypsodonty. The new materials assigned to Phanomys mixtus are the first mandibular fragments and palate known, yielding valuable morphological, ontogenetic, and phylogenetic information. Phanomys vetulus is recognized as a valid species, although better material is needed for a more robust definition. The phylogenetic analysis shows that Phanomys is the sister group of euhypsodont Cavioidea s.s. The evolutionary history of Cavioidea s.s. demonstrates that character states previously thought to correlate with the degree of hypsodonty (e.g. absence of fossettes/ids) do not all appear at the same time during the evolution of the group. Although the evolutionary trend in Cavioidea s.s. shows progressively increasing hypsodonty, the morphological changes inferred from this phylogenetic analysis indicate that hypsodonty and other character states were temporally decoupled during the evolution of the group during the Oligocene and early Miocene.
Kurzfassung
Die Cavioidea sensu stricto repräsentieren eine der divergierenden Linien innerhalb der su?damerikanischen Hystricognathi und sind zurzeit durch Meerschweinchen, Maras (Caviidae), und Wasserschweine vertreten. Caviiden und Hydrochoeriden wurden als die Kronen-Gruppe der Cavioidea s.s. interpretiert, während die “Eocardiidae”, eine paraphyletische Gruppe aus dem späten Oligozän bis mittleren Miozän aus Patagonien, als Stamm-Gruppe dargestellt wurden. Eine der interessantesten Merkmalsentwicklungen von Cavioidea s.s. ist die Evolution der Hypsodontie, die sich im Vergleich zu anderen Gruppen von Caviomorphen relativ langsam entwickelte; dies ermöglicht es, diesen Prozess bei Fossilien zu erkennen. Phanomys ist aus dem Ende des frühesten Miozän von Patagonien bekannt, und seit ihrer Erstbeschreibung wurde diese Gattung in die Nähe von euhypsodonten Taxa gestellt. Das Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, neues Material von Phanomys vorzustellen, die beiden Arten dieser Gattung neu zu beschreiben, ihre phylogenetische Stellung innerhalb der Caviodea s.s. durch eine kladistische Analyse mit morphologischen Merkmalen zu untersuchen und die Sequenz des Merkmalserwerbes von mit Euhypsodontie verbundener Merkmale zu untersuchen. Bei dem neuen Material handelt es sich um den ersten Rest des Unterkiefers und des Gaumens von Phanomys mixtus, und diese Reste ergeben wichtige morphologische, ontogenetische und auch phylogenetische Informationen. Bei Phanomys vetulus handelt sich um eine gültige Art, obwohl besseres Material für eine befriedigende Definition nötig ist. Die phylogenetische Analyse zeigt, dass Phanomys die Schwestergruppe der euhypsodonten Cavioidea s.s. darstellt. Die Evolution der Cavioidea s.s. zeigt, dass die Merkmale, die bisher in direktem Zusammenhang mit dem Grad der Hypsodontie gestellt wurden (z.B. Abwesenheit von fossettes/ids) nicht zur gleichen Zeit während der Entwicklung der Gruppe erscheinen. Obwohl die evolutionäre Entwicklung bei den Caviodea s.s. einen Trend zu zunehmender Hypsodontie aufweist, zeigen die morphologischen Veränderungen, basierend auf dieser phylogenetischen Hypothese, dass diese Merkmale und der Erwerb der Hypsodenties in der Evolution der Gruppe im Oligozän und frühen Miozän zeitlich entkoppelt waren.







References
Ameghino, Florentino. 1887a. Observaciones generales sobre el orden de mamíferos extinguidos sudamericanos llamados toxodontes (Toxodontia) y sinopsis de los géneros y especies hasta ahora conocidos. Anales del Museo de La Plata 1: 1–66. (Spec publication, 1936).
Ameghino, Florentino. 1887b. Enumeración sistemática de las especies de mamíferos fósiles coleccionados por Carlos Ameghino en los terrenos eocenos de Patagonia austral y depositados en el Museo de La Plata. Boletín del Museo de La Plata 1: 1–26.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1889. Contribución al conocimiento de los mamíferos fósiles de la República Argentina. Actas de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias en Córdoba 6: 1–1027. Atlas:1–98.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1891. Caracteres diagnósticos de cincuenta especies nuevas de mamíferos fósiles argentinos. Revista Argentina de Historia Natural 1: 129–167.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1894. Enumération synoptique des espéces de mammifères fossiles des formations éocènes de Patagonie. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba 13: 259–452.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1897. La Argentina a través de las últimas épocas geológicas. Pág. 1–35, figs 1–24. Buenos Aires: P. E. Coni.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1898. Sinopsis geológico-paleontológica. Censo de la República Argentina 1: 111–255.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1902. Première contribution à la connaissance de la faune mammalogique des couches à Colpodon. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba 17: 71–138.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1906. Les formations sédimentaires du Crétacé supérieur et du Tertiaire de Patagonie avec un parallèle entre leurs faunes mammalogiques et celles de l′ancien continent. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 15: 1–568.
Ameghino, Florentino. 1900. L’âge des formations sédimentaires de Patagonie. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina 50:109–130; 145–165, 209–229. Buenos Aires.
Barreda, Viviana, and Leandro Palazzesi. 2010. Vegetation during the Eocene-Miocene interval. In central Patagonia: A context of mammal evolution. In The paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and environmental change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia, ed. Richard Madden, Carlini Alfredo, María Vucetich, and Kay Richard, 375–382. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bellosi, Eduardo. 2010. Loessic and fluvias sedimentation in Sarmiento Formation pyroclastics, middle Cenozoic of central Patagonia. In The paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and environmental change through the middle Cenozoic of Patagonia, ed. R.H. Madden, A.A. Carlini, M.G. Vucetich, and R.F. Kay, 293–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blanga-Kanfi, Shani, Héctor Miranda, Osnat Penn, Tal Pupko, Ronald DeBry, and Dorothée Huchon. 2009. Rodent phylogeny revised: Analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 71. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-71.
Bowdich, T. 1821. An analysis of the natural classifications of Mammalia for the use of students and travelers, 115. Paris: Smith.
Bown, Thomas, and John Fleagle. 1993. Systematics, bioestratigraphy and dental evolution of the Palaeothentidae, Later Oligocene to Early—Middle Miocene (Deseadan-Santacrucian) Caenolestoid Marsupial of South America. Journal of Paleontology 67: 1–76.
Bown, Thomas, and C. Larriestra. 1990. Sedimentary paleonvironments of fossil platyrrhine localities, Miocene Pinturas Formation, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. Journal of Human Evolution 19: 87–119.
Candela, Adriana. 1999. The evolution of the molar pattern of the Erethizontidae (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) and the validity of Parasteiromys Ameghino, 1904. Palaeovertebrata 28: 53–73.
Coddington, Jonathan, and N. Scharff. 1994. Problems with zero-length branches. Cladistics 10: 415–423.
Escousteguy, Leonardo, Carlos Dal Molin, Mario Franchi, Silvana Geuna, and Lapido Omar. 2002. Estratigrafía de la cuenca de los ríos El Zeballos y Jeinemeni, Noroeste de la Provincia de Santa Cruz. El Calafate: Actas del XV Congreso Geológico Argentino.
Fischer de Waldheim, Gotthelf. 1817. Adversaria zoologica. Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 5: 357–428.
Fleagle, John, Thomas Bown, Carl Swisher, and G. Buckley. 1995. Ages of the Pinturas and Santa Cruz formations, 129–135. Trelew: Actas VI Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía.
Flynn, John, and Carl Swisher. 1995. Cenozoic South American Land-mammals ages: Correlation to global geochronologies. In Geochronoly. Time scale, and correlation: Framework for a historical geology, vol. 54, ed. W.A. Bergreen, D.V. Kent, and J. Handerbold, 317–333. Tulsa: SEPM Special Publication.
Goloboff, Pablo, John Farris and Kevin Nixon. 2008a. TNT: Tree analysis using new technology, version 1.1 (Williensis Hennig Society Edition). Program and documentation available at http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/tnt.
Goloboff, Pablo, John Farris, and Kevin Nixon. 2008b. A free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786.
Huchon, Dorothée, and E. Emmanuel Douzery. 2001. From the Old World to the New World: A molecular chronicle of the phylogeny and biogeography of hystricognath rodents. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20(2): 238–251.
Kay, Richard, Richard Madden, María G. Vucetich, Alfredo Carlini, Mario Mazzoni, Re Guillermo, Matthew Heizler, and Hamish Sandeman. 1999. Revised geochronology of the Casamayoran South American Land Mammal Age: Climatic and biotic implications. PNAS 96(23): 13235–13240.
Kay, Richard, Sergio Vizcaíno, Susana Bargo, Jonathan Perry, Francisco Prevosti, and Juan Fernícola. 2008. Two new fossil vertebrate localities in the Santa Cruz Formation (late early–early middle Miocene, Argentina), ~51° South latitude. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 25(2): 187–195.
Kluge, Aranold. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7–25.
Kraglievich, Lucas. 1932. Diagnosis de nuevos géneros y especies de roedores cávidos y eumegámidos fósiles de la Argentina. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina CXIV: 155–181 y 211–237.
Kramarz, Alejandro. 2006. Eocardiids (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the Pinturas Formation, late early Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26: 770–778.
Kramarz, Alejandro, and Eduardo Bellosi. 2005. Hystricognath rodents from the Pinturas Formation, early-middle Miocene of Patagonia, biostratigraphic and paleoenvironmental implications. Journal of South American Earth Science 18: 199–212.
Landry, Stuart. 1957. The interrelationships of the New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles 56: 1–118.
Mares, Michael and Ricardo Ojeda. 1982. Patterns of diversity and adaptation in South American hystricognath rodents. In Mammalian biology in South America, eds. M. Mares, and H. Genoways, Special Publication Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology 6:393–432.
Marivaux, Laurent, Monique Vianey-Liaud, and Jean-Jacques Jaeger. 2004. High-level phylogeny of early Tertiary rodents: Dental evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 105–134.
Marshall, Larry, and Rosendo Pascual. 1977. Nuevos marsupiales Caenolestidae del “Piso Notohipidense” (SW de Santa Cruz, Patagonia) de Ameghino. Sus aportaciones a la cronología y evolución de las comunidades de mamíferos sudamericanos. Publicaciones del Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Mar del Plata “Lorenzo Scaglia” 2(4): 91–122.
Mazzoni, Mario. 1985. La Formación Sarmiento y el vulcanismo paleógeno. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 40: 60–68.
Mones, Álvaro. 1982. An equivocal nomenclature: What means hypsodonty? Paläontologische Zeitschrift 56: 107–111.
Opazo, Juan. 2005. A molecular timescale for caviomorph rodents (Mammalia, Hystricognathi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 932–937.
Patterson, Bryan, and Albert Wood. 1982. Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 149: 370–543.
Pérez, María E. 2010a. A new rodent (Cavioidea, Hystricognathi) from the middle Miocene of Patagonia, mandibular homologies, and the origin of the crown group Cavioidea sensu stricto. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30: 1848–1859.
Pérez, María E. 2010b. Sistemática, ecología y bioestratigrafía de Eocardiidae (Rodentia, Hystricognathi, Cavioidea) del Mioceno temprano y medio de Patagonia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Pérez, María E., and María G. Vucetich. 2011. A new extinct genus of Cavioidea (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina) and the evolution of cavioid mandibular morphology. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 18: 163–183.
Pérez, María E., María G. Vucetich, and Alejandro Kramarz. 2010. The first Eocardiidae (Rodentia) in the Colhuehuapian (early Miocene) of Bryn Gwyn (northern Chubut, Argentina) and the early evolution of the peculiar cavioid rodents. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30:528–534.
Pol, Diego, and Ignacio Escapa. 2009. Unstable taxa in cladistic analysis: Identification and the assessment of relevant characters. Cladistics 25: 1–13.
Ré, Guillermo, Eduardo Bellosi, Mathew Heizler, Juan Vilas, Richard Madden, Alfredo Carlini, Richard Kay, and María Vucetich. 2010. A geochronology for the Sarmiento Formation at Gran Barranca. In The paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and environmental change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia, ed. R.H. Madden, A.A. Carlini, M.G. Vucetich, and R.F. Kay, 46–58. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press. ISBN-13: 978052187241.
Redford, Kent, and John Eisenberg. 1992. Mammals of the neotropics. The southern cone, vol. 2, 430. USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Rowe, Diane, Katherine Dunn, Ronald Adkins, and Rodney Honeycutt. 2010. Molecular clocks keep dispersal hypotheses afloat: Evidence for trans-Atlantic rafting by rodents. Journal of Biogeography 37: 305–324.
Scott, William. 1905. Reports of the Princeton University expedition to Patagonia (1896–1899). Paleontology. Mammalia of the Santa Cruz beds. III GLIRES: 384–499.
Tullberg, Tycho. 1899. Uber das system der nagethiere: Eine phylogenetische studie. Nova Acta Regiae Soc Scient Upsal 3: 1–514.
Ugarte, Federico. 1956. El Grupo Río Zeballos. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 11(3): 202–216. Buenos Aires.
Vucetich, María G. 1984. Los roedores de la Edad Friasense (Mioceno medio) de Patagonia. Revista del Museo de La Plata (nueva serie, Paleontología) 8: 47–126.
Vucetich, María G. 1994. La Fauna de roedores de la Formación Cerro Boleadoras (Mioceno inferior?). Acta Geológica Leopoldensia 39: 365–374.
Vucetich, María G. and Diego Verzi. 1995. Los Roedores Caviomorpha. In Evolución biológica y climática de la Región Pampeana durante los últimos cinco millones de años, eds. M. Alberdi, G. Leone, and E. Tonni. Monografías del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid 12:211–225.
Wood, Albert. 1985. The relationships, origins and dispersal of the hystricognathous rodents. In Evolutionary relationships among rodents. A multidisciplinary analysis, ed. W. Luckett, and J. Hartenberger, 515–548. New York: Plenum Press.
Wood, Albert, and Bryan Patterson. 1959. The rodents of the Deseadan Oligocene of Patagonia and the beginnings of South American rodent evolution. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 120: 280–428.
Woods, Charles. 1972. Comparative myology of jaw, hyoid, and pectoral appendicular regions of New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History 147: 3.
Woods, Charles, and Elizabeth Howland. 1979. Adaptive radiation of capromyid rodents: Anatomy of the masticatory apparatus. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 95–116.
Acknowledgments
We thank C. Deschamps (MLP), for improving the English version, and L. Reiner (MEF), for laboratory work. We thank Michelle Arnal (MACN) for improving the German zusammenfassung version. Access to SEM lab was possible thanks to ALUAR Aluminio Argentino SAIC and the help of Mr J. Groizard, and we thank M. Arnal, C. Vieytes and C. Deschamps for taking photos of MACN SC 3450. We thank the curators A. Kramarz (MACN), E. Ruigómez (MPEF-PV), M. Reguero (MLP-PV), D. Verzi (MLP), D. Romero (MMP), J. Flynn and J. Meng (AMNH), Christopher Norris and D. Brinkman (YPM PU), and K. Wellspring (ACM) for access to material in their care. We thank S. Vizcaíno and S. Bargo for access to material in their care. We are especially thankful to D. Pol for his aid in the phylogenetic analysis. Oliver Rauhut, Darin Croft, and A. Kramarz provided critical comments during the review process that greatly enhanced the quality of this manuscript. Fieldwork at Río Jeinemeni was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation to R. Kay. Comparisons with cavioid taxa for the phylogenetic analysis were made possible thanks to the Collection Study Grant (AMNH), an Ostrom Fund Grant (YPM, USA), PICT 38112 (M.G. Vucetich), and Fundación Egidio Feruglio.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez, M.E., Vucetich, M.G. A revision of the fossil genus Phanomys Ameghino, 1887 (Rodentia, Hystricognathi, Cavioidea) from the early Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina) and the acquisition of euhypsodonty in Cavioidea sensu stricto. Paläontol Z 86, 187–204 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-011-0120-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-011-0120-2