Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Position of Robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding on Bead Quality and Multi-objective Optimization Through Gray Relational Analysis

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of welding voltage, welding current, wire feeding speed, travelling speed and welding position on aspect ratio, dilution rate, microhardness and fluctuation using orthogonal experiment design. To achieve multi-objective optimization, S/N ratio conversion and grey relational analysis were employed, The model-predicted process parameters were then verified. The study findings indicate that the welding position has the greatest impact on aspect ratio, dilution rate and fluctuation, while the welding current has the greatest impact on the microhardness. Additionally, the force of the droplets at different positions affects the average aspect ratio and fluctuation, the arc shape affects the dilution rate, and the heat input affects the microhardness. Furthermore, the arc shape at different positions exhibits distinct characteristics. Finally, the optimal process parameters for different positions were obtained through an orthogonal test. The optimal combination of process parameters was found to be 70 A for welding current, 25 V for welding voltage, 500 cm.min−1 for wire feeding speed, 50 cm.min−1 for travelling speed, and vertical up welding position. The experimental results indicate that the optimized process parameters can consistently improve the welding quality, with a relative error of only 2.38% of only 2.38% between the grey relational degree and predicted value. This study's findings hold significant practical value for enhancing welding process stability and quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh, S. R., & Khanna, P. (2021). Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM): A new process to shape engineering materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pattanayak, S., & Sahoo, S. K. (2021). Gas metal arc welding based additive manufacturing—a review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 33, 398–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner, L. (2023). Metal additive manufacturing in structural engineering – review, advances, opportunities and outlook. Structures, 47, 2178–2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomar, B., Shiva, S., & Nath, T. (2022). A review on wire arc additive manufacturing: Processing parameters, defects, quality improvement and recent advances. Materials Today Communications, 31, 103739–103762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Teacher, M., & Velu, R. (2023). Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 25, 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00864-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiong, J., Li, Y., Li, R., & Yin, Z. (2018). Influences of process parameters on surface roughness of multi-layer single-pass thin-walled parts in GMAW-based additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 252, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kam, D. H., Lee, T. H., Kim, D. Y., Kim, J., & Kang, M. (2021). Weld quality improvement and porosity reduction mechanism of zinc coated steel using tandem gas metal arc welding (GMAW). Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 294, 117127–117136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramarao, M., King, M. F. L., Sivakumar, A., Manikandan, V., Vijayakumar, M., & Subbiah, R. (2022). Optimizing GMAW parameters to achieve high impact strength of the dissimilar weld joints using Taguchi approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 861–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammadi, J., Dashtgerd, I., Reza, R. A., & Mostafaei, A. (2024). Pulsed gas metal arc additive manufacturing of low-carbon steel: Microstructure observations and mechanical properties. Materials Today Communications, 38, 107637–107650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, M. C., Medale, M., Asserin, O., Gounand, S., & Gilles, P. (2017). Sensitivity to welding positions and parameters in GTA welding with a 3D multiphysics numerical model. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 71, 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2016.1264747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, Z., Hua, L., Qin, X., Ni, M., Ji, F., & Wu, M. (2021). Molten pool behaviors and forming appearance of robotic GMAW on complex surface with various welding positions. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 64, 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, Y. B., Feng, J. C., Li, L. Q., Li, Y., & Chang, S. (2013). Effects of welding positions on droplet transfer in CO2 laser–MAG hybrid welding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4926-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, D. Z., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., & Wang, J. Y. (2018). Effect of space welding position on droplet transition. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 32, 633–636 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Z.L., Lan L., Lu L.J. and Gui C.B. (2020). Pore sensitivity analysis of aluminum alloy joints at different welding positions. Electric welding machine, 50, 133–136+146 (In Chinese).

  15. He, S., Chen H., Cao X.Y., Xu L.D. and Shen, L. (2018). Droplet morphology and weld morphology of laser-MAG composite welding at different spatial positions. Hot Working Technology, 47, 76–80+84 (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.14158/j.cnki.1001-3814.2018.17.018

  16. Xiong, J., Lei, Y., Chen, H., & Zhang, G. (2017). Fabrication of inclined thin-walled parts in multi-layer single-pass GMAW-based additive manufacturing with flat position deposition. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 240, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibrahim, I. A., Mohamat, S. A., Amir, A., & Ghalib, A. (2012). The effect of gas metal arc welding (GMAW) processes on different welding parameters. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1502–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han, S.-W., Yoo, H., Shin, S., Kim, H., Lee, G., Jeon, J., Han, S., & Cho, J. (2023). Parameter optimization of WAAM with pulsed GMAW for manufacturing propeller-shaped blade. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 24, 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00797-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, F. J., Lv, Y. H., Xu, B. S., Liu, Y. X., Shu, F. Y., & He, P. (2012). Research on rapid prototyping technology based on pulsed plasma welding. Materials Science and Technology, 20, 89–93. In Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, N. T., Chu, L. P., Hu, M. S., Xu, X. B., Yu, B. S., Guo, H., Cui, Q., & Zheng, X. (2016). Weld forming and dilution rate of X65 steel surface deposited with Inconel 625 alloy. Welding Technology, 45, 41–44. https://doi.org/10.13846/j.cnki.cn12-1070/tg.2016.05.011. In Chinese.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, C. C., Huang, J. H., Zhang, T. C., & Ji, Y. J. (2012). Microstructure and microhardness analysis of linear friction welded joints of heterogeneous titanium alloys. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 33, 97–100+118. In Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sivaraman, A., & Paulraj, S. (2017). Multi-response optimization of process parameters for MIG welding of AA2219-T87 by Taguchi grey relational analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4, 8892–8900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lian, G., Xiao, S., Zhang, Y., Jiang, J., & Zhan, Y. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of coating properties and cladding efficiency in 316L/WC composite laser cladding based on grey relational analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 112, 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06486-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Santhosh, K. S., Mahender, T., & Varun, K. K. (2022). Optimization of gas tungsten arc welding parameters on mechanical properties of dissimilar AA2024 and AA6061 Aluminium alloys using Taguchi’s grey relational analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 67, 531–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin, H. L., & Huang, W. H. (2022). Multi-response optimization and investigations of al-steel lap-joint performance using a novel MIG weld-brazing technique. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 23, 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00672-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chandran, S., Rajesh, R., & Dev, A. M. (2021). Multi-response optimization of process parameters for laser beam welding of AA6061-Ti6Al4V by grey relational analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 7492–7496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support to this research from the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2020J01873)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changrong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Tang, B., Ye, Y. et al. Effect of Position of Robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding on Bead Quality and Multi-objective Optimization Through Gray Relational Analysis. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-024-00997-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-024-00997-7

Keywords

Navigation