Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hole Diameter Deviation Control Method for Robotic Hole-Making System Based on Presser Foot Action

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic hole-making systems are widely used in aerospace, automotive and other fields, mainly for diverse and structurally complex parts processing tasks. However, the industrial robot automatic hole-making system is an open-chain multi-bar tandem mechanism, which is prone to quality problems such as unstable cutting process, large hole diameter deviation and hole wall surface defects when performing tasks such as hole-making. This article constructs a stiffness enhancement model for the axial and horizontal directions of the robot presser foot based on the robot end stiffness enhancement method and analyzes the impact of pressure changes on hole-making quality under the action of the presser foot. Through experimental data analysis, the aperture deviation decreased by 32.91% compared to before the pressure foot and the average height of outlet burrs decreased by 85.3%, verifying the feasibility of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bu, Y., Liao, W., Tian, W., Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. (2017). Stiffness analysis and optimization in robotic drilling application. Precision Engineering, 49, 388–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, J., Hong, T., Seo, C. H., Jeon, Y. H., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Implicit force and position control to improve drilling quality in CFRP flexible robotic machining. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 68(10), 1123–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roukema, J. C., & Altintas, Y. (2007). Generalized modeling of drilling vibrations. Part I: Time domain model of making holes kinematics, dynamics and hole formation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47(9), 1455–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garnier, S., Subrin, K., & Waiyagan, K. (2017). Modelling of robotic drilling. Procedia Cirp, 58, 416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dumas, C., Caro, S., Gamier, S., & Furet, B. T. (2011). Joint stiffness identification of six-revolute industrial serial robots. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 27(4), 881–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iglesias, F. S., & López, A. F. (2020). Rayleigh damping parameters estimation using hammer impact tests. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 135, 1063911–10639111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, Y., Dong, H., & Ke, Y. (2015). Stiffness-oriented posture optimization in robotic machining applications. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 35(C), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahul, M. R., & Chiddarwar, S. S. (2023). Integrating virtual twin and deep neural networks for efficient and energy-aware robotic deburring in industry 4.0. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 24(9), 1517–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, L., Dong, H., Ke, Y., & Chen, G. (2018). Modeling of non-linear cutting forces for dry orbital drilling process based on undeformed chip geometry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1–4), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreras-Higuero, E., Leal-Muñoz, E., García de Jalón, J., Chacón, E., & Vizán, A. (2020). Robot-process precision modelling for the improvement of productivity in flexible manufacturing cells. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 65, 101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, N. , Shim, J. , Oh, D. , Kim, H. , & Lee, W. . (2019). Pose optimization of robot machining system for improving position accuracy. International Conference of the European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology.

  12. Roukema, J. C., & Altintas, Y. (2007). Generalized modeling of making holes vibrations. Part I: Time domain model of drilling kinematics, dynamics and hole formation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47(9), 1455–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen, V., Cvitanic, T., & Melkote, S. (2019). Data-driven modeling of the modal properties of a six-degrees-of-freedom industrial robot and its application to robotic milling. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(12), 121006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, D., & Zhou, S. (2006). Dynamic analysis of flexible-link and flexible-joint robots. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 5, 695–704.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, K. C., Huang, H. P., Kuo, T. H., & Liu, Y. L. (2012). Force control with vision feedback for robotic deburring processes. Advanced Science Letters, 8, 858–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fei, S. H., Fang, Q., Meng, X. L., & Ke, Y. L. (2012). Countersink depth control of robot drilling based on pressure foot displacement compensation. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 46(7), 1157–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stasiūnas, A., & Jureviius, M. (2013). Influence of cutting parameters on the surface roughness and hole diameter of drilling making parts of alluminium alloy. Mokslas - Lietuvos Ateitis, 4, 579–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alagarsamy, S. V. (2015). Optimization of Process Parameters in Drilling of Aluminium Alloy 7075 Using Taguchi Design and ANOVA Approach. International Conference on Sustainable Energy Systems and Energy Management.

  19. Qin, C., Xiao, D., Tao, J., Yu, H., Jin, Y., Sun, Y., et al. (2022). Concentrated velocity synchronous linear chirplet transform with application to robotic drilling chatter monitoring. Measurement, 194, 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu, H., Zhao, X., Tao, B., & Ding, H. (2022). A state-classification approach for light-weight robotic drilling using model-based data augmentation and multi-level deep learning. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 167, 108480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan, L., Sun, S., Pan, Z., Ding, D., Gienke, O., & Li, W. (2019). Mode coupling chatter suppression for robotic machining using semi-active magnetorheological elastomers absorber. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 117(15), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, C., Zhao, G., Zhao, Y., Xu, S., & Zheng, Z. (2022). Prediction model of net cutting specific energy based on energy flow in milling. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 9(5), 1285–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mousavi, S., Gagnol, V., Bouzgarrou, B. C., & Ray, P. (2017). Dynamic modeling and stability prediction in robotic machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88, 3053–3065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, D. G., & Yang, S. H. (2023). Efficient analysis of CFRP cutting force and chip formation based on cutting force models under various cutting conditions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00822-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, L., Liao, W., Zheng, K., Tian, W., Liu, J., & Feng, J. (2022). Stability analysis of robotic longitudinal-torsional composite ultrasonic milling. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(8), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tao, J., Qin, C., Xiao, D., et al. (2019). A pre-generated matrix-based method for real-time robotic drilling chatter monitoring. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 165(12), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Artificial Intelligence Institute of Donghua University, Shanghai, China

    Xiaohu Zheng

  2. College of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

    Guanyao Zhang & Chao Zhou

  3. Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Institute, Shanghai, China

    Guoqiang Guo

Authors
  1. Xiaohu Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guanyao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guoqiang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohu Zheng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, X., Zhang, G., Zhou, C. et al. Hole Diameter Deviation Control Method for Robotic Hole-Making System Based on Presser Foot Action. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 25, 319–333 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00930-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00930-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation