Abstract
The cutting characteristics of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) during zig-zag milling, which is the most used milling tool path in the industry, were analyzed. Cutting force and chip formation are the most useful indicators of cutting performance. Here, cutting force and chip formation were analyzed in up- and down-milling, then compared with those parameters in zig-zag milling. CFRP cutting force models for up- and down-milling were used for analysis of cutting force. Chip formations were predicted via simulations of fiber cutting angle. This simulation-based study overcame various experimental limitations regarding CFRP cutting force. The specific cutting forces of various fiber cutting angles were derived from cutting experiments involving unidirectional CFRP. The specific cutting forces decreased with increasing chip thickness. These results are similar to the size effect observed in metal machining. Cutting force analysis was performed with a focus on change in feed direction and rate of radial immersion. In zig-zag milling, the optimal feed direction rapidly changed at a radial immersion of 30%. At a radial immersion of 75%, the difference in cutting force related to the change in the feed direction was large. Type I (delamination-type) chip formation was dominant in the optimal feed direction because specific cutting force was lower in the Type I section than in regions of other chip formation types.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-023-00822-7/MediaObjects/12541_2023_822_Fig16_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \(h\) :
-
Chip thickness [mm]
- \({a}_{p}\) :
-
Axial depth of cut [mm]
- \({f}_{z}\) :
-
Feed rate [mm/rev-tooth]
- \(\theta\) :
-
Cutting tool rotation angle [°]
- \(\mathrm{\varnothing }\) :
-
Fiber cutting angle [°]
- \(\varphi\) :
-
Fiber orientation angle [°]
- \({\varphi }_{a}\) :
-
Absolute fiber orientation angle [°]
- \({\theta }_{s}\) :
-
Cutting tool entry angle [°]
- \({\theta }_{e}\) :
-
Cutting tool exit angle [°]
- \({\theta }_{c}\) :
-
Immersion angle range of cutting tool [°]
- \({a}_{e}\) :
-
Radial depth of cut [mm]
- \(D\) :
-
Cutting tool diameter [mm]
- \({f}_{d}\) :
-
Feed direction [°]
- \({F}_{t}, {F}_{r}\) :
-
Tangential cutting force [N], radial cutting force [N]
- \({F}_{x}, {F}_{y}\) :
-
Milling force in x-direction [N], milling force in y-direction [N]
- \({K}_{t}, {K}_{r}\) :
-
Tangential specific cutting force [N/mm2], radial specific cutting force [N/mm2]
- \(R\) :
-
Cutting tool radius [mm]
- \({N}_{t}\) :
-
Number of teeth on cutting tool
- \({F}_{up},{F}_{down}\) :
-
Up-milling resultant cutting force [N], down-milling resultant cutting force [N]
- \({F}_{sum}\) :
-
Sum of resultant cutting forces [N
References
Seo, J. W., Kim, D. Y., Kim, D. C., & Park, H. W. (2021). Recent developments and challenges on machining of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite laminates. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 22, 2027–2044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00596-w
Poór, D. I., Geier, N., Pereszlai, C., & Xu, J. (2021). A critical review of the drilling of CFRP composites: Burr formation, characterisation and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 223, 109155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109155
Choi, J. Y., Jeon, J. H., Lyu, J. H., et al. (2022). Current applications and development of composite manufacturing processes for future mobility. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-022-00483-3
Haddad, M., Zitoune, R., Eyma, F., & Castanie, B. (2014). Study of the surface defects and dust generated during trimming of CFRP: Influence of tool geometry, machining parameters and cutting speed range. Composites. Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 66, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.07.005
Hocheng, H., Puw, H. Y., & Huang, Y. (1993). Preliminary study on milling of unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced plastics. Composites Manufacturing, 4, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7143(93)90077-L
Hocheng, H., & Tsao, C. C. (2003). Comprehensive analysis of delamination in drilling of composite materials with various drill bits. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140, 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00749-0
Hintze, W., & Hartmann, D. (2013). Modeling of delamination during milling of unidirectional CFRP. Procedia CIRP, 8, 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.131
Abrão, A. M., Rubio, J. C. C., Faria, P. E., & Davim, J. P. (2008). The effect of cutting tool geometry on thrust force and delamination when drilling glass fibre reinforced plastic composite. Materials and Design, 29, 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.016
Gaitonde, V. N., Karnik, S. R., Rubio, J. C., et al. (2008). Analysis of parametric influence on delamination in high-speed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastic composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 203, 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.050
Gaugel, S., Sripathy, P., Haeger, A., et al. (2016). A comparative study on tool wear and laminate damage in drilling of carbon-fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP). Composite Structures, 155, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.004
Geier, N. (2020). Influence of fibre orientation on cutting force in up and down milling of UD-CFRP composites. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 111, 881–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06163-3
Sheikh-Ahmad, J., Twomey, J., Kalla, D., & Lodhia, P. (2007). Multiple regression and committee neural network force prediction models in milling FRP. Machining Science and Technology, 11, 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910340701554873
Mullin, R., Farhadmanesh, M., Ahmadian, A., & Ahmadi, K. (2020). Modeling and identification of cutting forces in milling of carbon fibre reinforced polymers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 280, 116595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116595
Ning, H., Zheng, H., Zhang, S., & Yuan, X. (2021). Milling force prediction model development for CFRP multidirectional laminates and segmented specific cutting energy analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 113, 2437–2445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06690-7
Wang, C., Zhang, X., Zhai, Z., & Chen, X. (2022). Parametric prediction model and periodic fluctuation interpretation of unidirectional CFRP edge milling force. Composite Structures, 287, 115387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115387
Kim, D. G., Jung, Y. C., Kweon, S. H., & Yang, S. H. (2022). Determination of the optimal milling feed direction for unidirectional CFRPs using a predictive cutting-force model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 123, 3571–3585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10309-w
Wang, H., Ning, F., Hu, Y., et al. (2018). EDGE trimming of CFRP composites using rotary ultrasonic machining: Effects of ultrasonic vibration. In ASME 2018 13th Int Manuf Sci Eng Conf MSEC 2018 (Vol. 4, pp. 1641–1653). https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2018-6362
Slimane, A., Slimane, S., Kebdani, S., et al. (2019). Parameters effects analysis of rotary ultrasonic machining on carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite using an interactive RSM method. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13, 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0518-0
Kannan, S., & Pervaiz, S. (2020). Surface morphology of inclined CFRP holes when machined under cryogenic environment. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 35, 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1762208
Kumar, D., & Gururaja, S. (2020). Machining damage and surface integrity evaluation during milling of UD-CFRP laminates: Dry vs. cryogenic. Composite Structures, 247, 112504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112504
Kumar, D., Gururaja, S., & Jawahir, I. S. (2020). Machinability and surface integrity of adhesively bonded Ti/CFRP/Ti hybrid composite laminates under dry and cryogenic conditions. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 58, 1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.064
Kim, G., Kim, T. G., Lee, S. W., & Min, B. K. (2022). Effect of workpiece preheating on tool wear and delamination at the hole exit in high feed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics with diamond-coated tools. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 74, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.013
Toh, C. K. (2005). Comparison of chip surface temperature between up and down milling orientations in high speed rough milling of hardened steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 167, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.004
Bouzakis, K. D., Makrimallakis, S., Skordaris, G., et al. (2013). Coated tools’ performance in up and down milling stainless steel, explained by film mechanical and fatigue properties. Wear, 303, 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.04.014
Laamouri, A., Ghanem, F., Braham, C., & Sidhom, H. (2019). Influences of up- and down-milling on surface integrity and fatigue strength of X160CrMoV12 steel. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105, 1209–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04280-2
Huo, G., Jiang, X., Su, C., et al. (2019). CNC tool path generation for freeform surface machining based on preferred feed direction field. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 20, 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00084-2
Shi, K., Liu, N., Wang, S., & Ren, J. (2019). Effect of tool path on cutting force in end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 104, 4289–4300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04120-3
Mali, R. A., Gupta, T. V. K., & Ramkumar, J. (2021). A comprehensive review of free-form surface milling—Advances over a decade. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 62, 132–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.014
Wang, J., Jiang, R., Wu, Z., et al. (2023). Investigation of surface integrity up-milling magnesium oxide particle reinforced wood-based composite. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00737-9
Kang, G., Kim, J., Choi, Y., & Lee, D. Y. (2022). In-process identification of the cutting force coefficients in milling based on a virtual machining model. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 23, 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00677-4
Fu, X., Song, K., Kim, D. M., et al. (2022). Geometrical simulation model for milling of carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP). International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 23, 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00681-8
Pereszlai, C., Geier, N., Poór, D. I., et al. (2021). Drilling fibre reinforced polymer composites (CFRP and GFRP): An analysis of the cutting force of the tilted helical milling process. Composite Structures, 262, 113646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113646
Altintas, Y. (2004). Manufacturing automation: Metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design.
Sheikh-Ahmad, J. Y. (2009). The machining of polymers composites. Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, DG., Yang, SH. Efficient Analysis of CFRP Cutting Force and Chip Formation Based on Cutting Force Models Under Various Cutting Conditions. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 24, 1235–1251 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00822-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00822-7