Abstract
This paper proposes a geometrical 3D milling simulation algorithm for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) milling. In this simulation model, milling tools are simplified into layers of circles while CFRP lami- nates are simplified into layers of Dexel lines, which can realize simulations for various complex milling conditions. Significant geometrical parameters, for ex-ample, cutting angle and cutting length, can be computed with high efficiency. With some geometry-related physical models, the machining results can be pre-dicted for the entire milling process. The effectiveness of this simulation model has been validated by the milling force prediction and the delamination pre-diction. The performance of this simulation model benefits industrial CFRP manufacturing and provides a new method for online or long-time-interval simulation of CFRP machining.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig19_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig20_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig21_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig22_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig23_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig24_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig25_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig26_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig27_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig28_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12541-022-00681-8/MediaObjects/12541_2022_681_Fig29_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The machining results and prediction results have been presented in this research. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Martin Byung-Guk Jun on request.
Code availability
The algorithm used to support the findings of this study is included within the article.
References
Perner, M., Algermissen, S., Keimer, R., & Monner, H. P. (2016). Avoiding defects in manufacturing processes: A review for automated CFRP production. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 38, 82–92.
Birk, F., Ali, F., Weigold, M., Abele, E., & Schützer, K. (2020). Lightweight hybrid CFRP design for machine tools with focus on simple manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 108(11), 3915–3924.
James, S., Sonate, A., Dang, C. & De La Luz L. (2018). Experimental and simulation study of ultrasonic additive manufacturing of CFRP/Ti stacks. In International manufacturing science and engineering conference (Vol. 51388, pp. V004T03A044).
Hintze, W., Hartmann, D., & Schütte, C. (2011). Occurrence and propagation of delamination during the machining of carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRPs)–an experimental study. Composites Science and Technology, 71(15), 1719–1726.
Knops, M. (2008). Analysis of failure in fiber polymer laminates: the theory of Alfred puck. Springer.
Kerrigan, K., & O’Donnell, G. E. (2013). Temperature measurement in CFRP milling using a wireless tool-integrated process monitoring sensor. International Journal of Automation Technology, 7(6), 742–750.
Rentsch, R., Pecat, O., & Brinksmeier, E. (2011). Macro and micro process modeling of the cutting of carbon fiber reinforced plastics using FEM. Procedia Engineering, 10, 1823–1828.
Pecat, O., Rentsch, R., & Brinksmeier, E. (2012). Influence of milling process parameters on the surface integrity of CFRP. Procedia CIRP, 1, 466–470.
Gao, C., Xiao, J., Xu, J., & Ke, Y. (2016). Factor analysis of machining parameters of fiber-reinforced polymer composites based on finite element simulation with experimental investigation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(5–8), 1113–1125.
Santiuste, C., Olmedo, A., Soldani, X., & Miguélez, H. (2012). Delamination prediction in orthogonal machining of carbon long fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 31(13), 875–885.
Phadnis, V. A., Makhdum, F., Roy, A., & Silberschmidt, V. V. (2013). Drilling in carbon/epoxy composites: Experimental investigations and finite element implementation. Composites Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 47, 41–51.
Usui, S., Wadell, J., & Marusich, T. (2014). Finite element modeling of carbon fiber composite orthogonal cutting and drilling. Procedia CIRP, 14, 211–216.
KoPlev, A. A., Lystrup, A., & Vorm, T. (1983). The cutting process, chips, and cutting forces in machining CFRP. Composites, 14(4), 371–376.
Karpat, Y., Bahtiyar, O., & Değer, B. (2012). Mechanistic force modeling for milling of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminates. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 56, 79–93.
Voss, R., Seeholzer, L., Kuster, F., & Wegener, K. (2017). Influence of fibre orientation, tool geometry and process parameters on surface quality in milling of CFRP. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 18, 75–91.
Haiyan, W., Xuda, Q., Hao, L., & Chengzu, R. (2013). Analysis of cutting forces in helical milling of carbon fiber–reinforced plastics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 227(1), 62–74.
Chao, P. Y., & Hwang, Y. D. (1997). An improved Taguchi’s method in design of experiments for milling CFRP composite. International Journal of Production Research, 35(1), 51–66.
Zhao, W., & Qian, X. (2009). Mathematical Morphology in Multi-Dexel Representation. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 48999, 733–742.
Liu, S. Q., Ong, S.-K., Chen, Y. P., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2006). Real-time, dynamic level-of-detail management for three-axis NC milling simulation. Computer Design, 38(4), 378–391.
Stifter, S. (1995). Simulation of NC machining based on the dexel model: A critical analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 10(3), 149–157.
Konig, A. H., & Groller, E. (1998). Real time simulation and visualization of NC milling processes for inhomogeneous materials on low-end graphics hardware. IEEE.
Sullivan, A., Erdim, H., Perry, R. N., & Frisken, S. F. (2012). High accuracy NC milling simulation using composite adaptively sampled distance fields. Computer Design, 44(6), 522–536.
Koenigsberger, F., & Sabberwal, A. J. P. (1961). An investigation into the cutting force pulsations during milling operations. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, 1(1–2), 15–33.
Budak, E., Altintas, Y., & Armarego, E. J. A. (1996). Prediction of milling force coefficients from orthogonal cutting data. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 118(2), 216–224.
Sheikh-Ahmad, J., Twomey, J., Kalla, D., & Lodhia, P. (2007). Multiple regression and committee neural network force prediction models in milling FRP. Machining Science and Technology, 11(3), 391–412.
Haiyan, W., & Xuda, Q. (2016). A mechanistic model for cutting force in helical milling of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82(9), 1485–1494.
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE, Korea).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XF contributed to the experimentation, programming of the software, writing of the research paper. KS contributed to the writing and experimentation. DMK contributed to the literature review and advising. ZK contributed to the writing of the manuscript. and MBJ provided the idea and supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The research does not involve ethical issues.
Consent for publication
All the authors consent to publish this work.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, X., Song, K., Kim, D.M. et al. Geometrical Simulation Model for Milling of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP). Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 23, 1237–1260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00681-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00681-8