One recent success of additive manufacturing (AM; also known as 3D printing) technologies is a 3D printed pressure-sensitive sensor (i.e. tactile sensor) with a greater degree of design complexity and multi-material components. Although 3D printed pressure sensors have been realized, there still exists a topic of extensive ongoing research. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hardness of the 3D printed sensors on characteristics such as the sensitivity and load capacity of the sensors. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide guidelines for selecting hardness for 3D printed sensors used in different sensor applications (i.e., soft and highly sensitive humanoid hands vs. less soft and less sensitive industrial robotic hands). A multi-material direct-print photopolymerization (DPP) process was used to produce an entire sensor that consists of insulating layers, electrode layers, and a pressure-sensitive layer. Soft and rigid photopolymers were blended to achieve six different hardness levels such as Shore A of 50, 60, 70, 85, 95 and 98. A carbon nanotube/polymer composite was used to create the electrodes, and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate as an ionic liquid was used with a photopolymer for the pressure-sensitive layer. Sensors of different hardness were tested by applying varying loads using a force gauge, and sensor signals were collected. Soft sensors with Shore A hardness of 50, 60 and 70 showed reliable outputs, where the softer sensor provided better sensitivity and smaller errors but lower load capacity. Sensors with Shore A of 85, 95 and 98 did not show reliable outputs, where the harder insulating layer did not allow the force gauge to press into the sensor, instead causing the gauge to slip over the surface. These findings could be useful for designing customized sensors for applications with different load conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Campbell, I., Bourell, D., & Gibson, I. (2012). Additive manufacturing: Rapid prototyping comes of age. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 184(4), 255–258.
AMFG Blog. (2019). The Additive Manufacturing Industry Landscape 2019: 171 Companies Driving the Industry Forward [Updated]. Autonomous Manufacturing Ltd. https://amfg.ai/2019/02/27/additive-manufacturing-industry-landscape-2019. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
Cuffari, B. (2018). Hybrid 3D Printing in the Aerospace Industry. Azo Materials. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=16714. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(E). (2016). Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing – General Principles – Terminology. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, Pa. https://compass.astm.org/EDIT/html_annot.cgi?ISOASTM52900+15. Retrieved 5 June 2020.
Vatani, M., Lu, Y., Engeberg, E. D., & Choi, J. (2015). Combined 3D printing technologies and material for fabrication of tectile sensors. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(7), 1375–1383.
Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S., & Bandyopadhyay, B. (2013). Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Materials Today, 16(12), 496–504.
Palo, M., Holländer, J., Suominen, J., Yliruusi, J., & Sandler, N. (2017). 3D printed drug delivery devices: Perspectives and technical challenges. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 14(9), 685–696.
Lewis, J. (2006). Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Advanced Functional Materials, 16(17), 2193–2204.
Alkadi, F., Lee, J., Yeo, J. S., Hwang, S. H., & Choi, J. (2019). 3D printing of ground tire rubber composites. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 6, 211–222.
Lu, N., & Kim, D. (2013). Flexible and stretchable electronics paving the way for soft robotics. Soft Robotics, 1(1), 53–62.
Kramer, R., Majidi, C., Sahai, R., & Wood, R. (2011). Soft curvature sensors for joint angle proprioception. In 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, Calif. 25–30 September (pp. 1919–1926). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2011.6094701.
Bauer, S. (2006). Piezo-, pyro- and ferroelectrets: Soft transducer materials for electro-mechanical energy conversion. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 13(5), 953–962.
Wang, F. (2015). Soft tactile sensors for human-machine interaction. In X. Tao (Ed.), Handbook of smart textiles (pp. 317–355). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Zhang, X., Ai, J., Ma, Z., Du, Z., Chen, D., Zou, R., & Su, B. (2020). Magnetoelectric soft composites with a self-powered tactile sensing capacity. Nano Energy, 69, 104391.
Abushagur, A., Bakar, A., Arsad, N., & Shaari, S. (2014). Sub-millinewton force sensor for Vitreoretinal microsurgery using linear chirp fiber Bragg grating. In Proceedings of 2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–4 September (pp. 41–43). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICP.2014.7002305.
Zang, Y., Zhang, F., Di, C., & Zhu, D. (2012). Advances of flexible pressure sensors toward artificial intelligence and health care applications. Materials Horizons, 2(2), 140–156.
Wettels, N., Rarnandi, A., Moon, J., Loeb, G., & Sukhatme, G. (2009). Grip control using biomimetic tactile sensing systems. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 14(6), 718–723.
Tang, Z., Jia, S., Zhou, C., & Li, B. (2020). 3D printing of highly sensitive and large-measurement-range flexible pressure sensors with a positive piezoresistive effect. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12(25), 28669–28680.
Hou, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Zhao, H., Zha, J., & Dang, Z. (2013). Positive piezoresistive behavior of electrically conductive alkyl-functionalized graphene/polydimethylsilicone nanocomposite. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 1(3), 515–521.
Pei, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, D., Wang, J., Yuan, Z., et al. (2019). Highly sensitive, stretchable strain sensor based on Ag@COOH-functionalized CNTs for stroke and pronunciation recognition. Advanced Electronic Materials, 5, 1900227.
Liu, Y., Shang, S., Mo, S., Wang, P., & Wang, H. (2020). Eco-friendly strategies for the material and fabrication of wearable sensors. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00285-5.
Murr, L. (2016). Frontiers of 3D printing/additive manufacturing: From human organs to aircraft fabrication. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 32(10), 987–995.
Ngo, T., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172–196.
Emon, M., Alkadi, F., Philip, D., Kim, D., Lee, K., & Choi, J. (2019). Multi-material 3D printing of a soft pressure sensor. Additive Manufacturing, 28, 629–638.
Vatani, M., & Choi, J. (2017). Direct-print photopolymerization for 3D printing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(2), 337–343.
ASTM D2240-15e1. (2015). Standard test method for rubber property—durometer hardness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa. https://www.astm.org/Standards/D2240.
Vatani, M., Vatani, M., & Choi, J. W. (2016). Multi-layer stretchable pressure sensors using ionic liquids and carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters, 108, 061908.
Emon, M. O. F., & Choi, J. W. (2017). Flexible piezoresistive sensors embedded in 3D printed tires. Sensors, 17(3), 656.
Lee, J., Emon, M. O. F., Vatani, M., & Choi, J. W. (2017). Effect of degree of crosslinking and polymerization of 3D printable polymer/ionic liquid composites on performance of stretchable piezoresistive sensors. Smart Materials and Structures, 26, 035043.
Emon, M., Lee, J., Choi, U., Kim, D., Lee, K., & Choi, J. (2019). Characterization of a soft pressure sensor on the basis of ionic liquid concentration and thickness of the piezoresistive layer. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(15), 6076–6084.
ASTM D638. (2014). Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa. https://www.astm.org/Standards/D638.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, M., Philip, D.G., Emon, M.O.F. et al. Effects of Hardness on the Sensitivity and Load Capacity of 3D Printed Sensors. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 22, 483–494 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00468-9
- 3D printed sensor
- Pressure-sensitive sensor
- Tactile sensor
- Direct-print photopolymerization