Skip to main content
Log in

Underactuated Three-Finger Robot Hand with Human-Like Flexion

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have been conducted on three-finger robot hands, which are widely used in industries. These studies led to the development of motorized prosthetic hands for amputees. Although many developers have focused on the functionality of motorized prosthetic hands, prosthetic users place more importance on the human-like motion of the device owing to social implications. Therefore, this study aims to achieve human-like flexion of a three-finger robot hand. Each finger contains three phalanges joined by pivots and torsional return springs. A tendon wire runs through guide pins inside the phalanges up to the linear actuator located in the forearm. When the tendon wire is pulled, the finger is flexed. The return springs are optimally selected based on ADAMS simulations and kinesiology of the human hand. The selection is then verified by experiments

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C PIM :

Ratio of spring coefficients of PIP and MCP joints

C DIP :

Ratio of spring coefficients of DIP and PIP joints

S PIM :

Slope of variations in PIP and MCP joint angles

S DIP :

Slope of variations in DIP and PIP joint angles

K MCP :

Coefficient of torsion spring in MCP joint

K PIP :

Coefficient of torsion spring in PIP joint

K DIP :

Coefficient of torsion spring in DIP joint

\(\theta_{MCP}\) :

Rotation angle of MCP joint

\(\theta_{PIP}\) :

Rotation angle of PIP joint

\(\theta_{DIP}\) :

Rotation angle of DIP joint

R MCP :

Distance between center of MCP joint and tendon wire

R PIP :

Distance between center of PIP joint and tendon wire

R DIP :

Distance between center of DIP joint and tendon wire

M MCP :

Moment on MCP joint

M PIP :

Moment on PIP joint

M DIP :

Moment on DIP joint

T :

Tension on tendon wire

References

  1. Jacobsen, S. C., Wood, J. E., Knutti, D. F., & Biggers, K. B. (1984). The UTAH/M.I.T. Dextrous hand: Work in progress. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 3(4), 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonivento, C., Faldella, E., & Vassura, G. (1991). The University of Bologna Robotic Hand Project: current state and future developments. In Fifth international conference on advanced robotics ‘robots in unstructured environments.

  3. Melchiorri, C., & Vassura, G. (1992). Mechanical and Control Features of the University of Bologna Hand Version 2. In Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems.

  4. Lotti, F., Tiezzi, P., Vassura G., Biagiotti L., Melchiorri, C., & Palli, G. (2004). UBH 3: A biologically inspired robotic hand. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on intelligent manipulation and grasping.

  5. Lovchik, C. S., & Diftler, M. A. (1999). The Robonaut hand: A dexterous robot hand for space. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation.

  6. Tomović, R. (1990). Advances in the design of autonomous dextrous hands. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 7(3–4), 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubinger, B., Brousseau, M., Lymer, J. D., Gosselin, C., & Laliberté, T. (2002). A novel robotic hand-sarah for operations on the international space station. In 7th ESA workshop on advanced space technologies for robotics and automation.

  8. Hirose, S., & Umetani, Y. (1978). The development of soft gripper for the versatile robot hand. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 13(3), 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, L., Butterfass, J., Knoch, S., Meusel, P., & Hirzinger, G. (1999). A new control strategy for DLR’s multisensory articulated hand. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 19(2), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Massa, B., Roccella, S., Carrozza, M. C., & Dario, P., (2002). Design and development of an underactuated prosthetic hand. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation.

  11. Ko, H. K., Cho, C. H., Kwon, H. C., & Kim, K. H. (2012). Design of an underactuated robot hand based on displacement-force conversion mechanism. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(4), 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sono, T., Menegaldo, L., & Pinotti, M. (2014). Hand prosthesis prototype controlled by EMG and vibrotactile force feedback. In 5th IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics.

  13. Kaneko, M., Higashimori, M., Takenaka, R., Namiki, A., & Ishikawa, M. (2003). The 100 G capturing robot—Too Fast to See. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 8(1), 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamamoto, T., Nomura, S., & Koganezawa, K. (2016). Dexterous gripping of a hand with multi-joint fingers. In 2016 IEEE international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics.

  15. Sebastiani, F., Roccella, S., Vecchi, F., Carrozza, M. C. & Dario, P. (2003). Experimental analysis and performance comparison of three different prosthetic hands designed according to a biomechatronic approach. In Proceedings 2003 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics.

  16. Inouye, J. M., & Valero-Cuevas, F. J. (2013). Anthropomorphic tendon-driven robotic hands can exceed human grasping capabilities following optimization. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 33(5), 694–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong, H., Asadi, E., Qiu, C., Dai, J., & Chen, I. M. (2018). Geometric design optimization of an under-actuated tendon-driven robotic gripper. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 50, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shintake, J., Cacucciolo, V., Floreano, D., & Shea, H. (2018). Soft robotic grippers. Advanced Materials, 30(29), 1707035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ko, T. (2020). A tendon-driven robot gripper with passively switchable underactuated surface and its physics simulation based parameter optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(4), 5002–5009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rabinowicz, E. (1995). Friction and wear of materials. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buchholz, B., & Armstrong, T. J. (1992). A kinematic model of the human hand to evaluate its prehensile capabilities. Journal of Biomechanics, 25(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerveri, P., De Momi, E., Lopomo, N., Baud-Bovy, G., Barros, R. M. L., & Ferrigno, G. (2007). Finger kinematic modeling and real-time hand motion estimation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 35(11), 1989–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kortier, H. G., Sluiter, V. I., Roetenberg, D., & Veltink, P. H. (2014). Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiu, H. Y., Su, F. C., Wang, S. T., & Hsu, H. Y. (1998). The motion analysis system and goniometry of the finger joints. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British and European, 23(6), 788–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Somia, N., Rash, G. S., Wachowiak, M., & Gupta, A. (1998). The initiation and sequence of digital joint motion: A three-dimensional motion analysis. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23(6), 792–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rash, G. S., Belliappa, P. P., Wachowiak, M. P., Somia, N. N., & Gupta, A. (1999). A demonstration of the validity of a 3-D video motion analysis method for measuring finger flexion and extension. Journal of Biomechanics, 32(12), 1337–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, X., Wan, K. Wen, R., & Hu Y. (2018). Development of finger motion reconstruction system based on leap motion controller. In 2018 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and virtual environments for measurement systems and applications.

  28. Hahn, P., Krimmer, H., Hradetzky, A., & Lanz, U. (1995). Quantitative analysis of the linkage between the interphalangeal joints of the index finger. An in vivo study. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British and European, 20(5), 696–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamper, D. G., Cruz, E. G., & Siegel, M. P. (2003). Stereotypical fingertip trajectories during grasp. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(6), 3702–3710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khuri, A. I., & Cornell, J. A. (1996). Response surface: Designs and analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun, W., Lin, J., Su, S., Wang, N., & Er, M. J. (2020). Reduced adaptive fuzzy decoupling control for lower limb exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 1–1. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9013052.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwon-Hee Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, HC., Cho, DH. & Kim, KH. Underactuated Three-Finger Robot Hand with Human-Like Flexion. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 22, 791–798 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00461-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00461-2

Keywords

Navigation