Skip to main content
Log in

Tool edge radius wear and material removal rate performance charts for titanium micro-milling

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micro-machining applications have been extended from electronics to micro-scale medical implants and devices. Micro-milling among the micro-machining processes, has the potential to be the most cost effective and efficient material removal process due to ease of use and accessibility of the tools. Complex challenges are faced due to size effect, vibrations, and other uncontrollable factors coupled with a material like Titanium used in several aerospace and medical applications which is also a representative as difficult to machine material. This study analyzes tool edge wear on micro-end-milling of commercially pure Titanium (ASTM SB 265 GR2) applying design of experiment aided with response surface methodologies to find a proper set of cutting parameters. The results show that it is possible to achieve reduced tool wear while material removal rate is balanced simultaneously. Performance charts are developed to assist in appropriate selection of cutting parameters in Titanium micro-milling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qin, Y., “Micromanufacturing Engineering and Technology,” William Andrew, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, K. and Huo, D., “Micro-Cutting: Fundamentals and Applications,” John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Alting, L., Kimura, F., Hansen, H. N., and Bissacco, G., “Micro Engineering,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 635–657, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camara, M. A., Rubio, J. C. C., Abrão, A. M., and Davim, J. P., “State of The Art on Micromilling of Materials, A Review,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 673–685, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gherman, L., Gleadall, A., Bakker, O., and Ratchev, S., “Manufacturing Technology: Micro-Machining,” in: Micro-Manufacturing Technologies and their Applications, Fassi, I., Shipley, D., (Eds.), Springer, pp. 97–127, 2017.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chae, J., Park, S. S., and Freiheit, T., “Investigation of Micro-Cutting Operations,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 313–332, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schalkwyk, T. G. D. van., “Micromilling Analysis,” ISEM 2011 Proceedings, pp. 1–17, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pratap, T., Patra, K., and Dyakonov, A., “Modeling Cutting Force in Micro-Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy,” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 129, No. pp. 134–139, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gil, F. and Planel, Y. J. A., “Aplicaciones Biomédicas del Titanio v sus Aleaciones,” Biomecánica, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 34–42, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oosthuizen, G., Nunco, K., Conradie, P., and Dimitrov, D., “The Effect of Cutting Parameters on Surface Integrity in Milling Ti-6Al-4V,” South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 115–123, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bao, W. and Tansel, I., “Modeling Micro-End-Milling Operations. Part III: Influence of Tool Wear,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 40, No. 15, pp. 2193–2211, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elkaseer, A. A., Dimov, S., Popov, K., and Minev, R., “Tool Wear in Micro-Endmilling: Material Microstructure Effects, Modeling, and Experimental Validation,” Journal of Micro and Nano-Manufacturing, Vol. 2, No. 4, Paper No. 044502, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliaei, S. N. B. and Karpat, Y., “Influence of Tool Wear on Machining Forces and Tool Deflections during Micro Milling,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 84, No. 9-12, pp. 1963–1980, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thepsonthi, T. and Özel, T., “Multi-Objective Process Optimization for Micro-End Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 63, Nos. 9-12, pp. 903–914, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Natarajan, U., Periyanan, P., and Yang, S., “Multiple-Response Optimization for Micro-Endmilling Process Using Response Surface Methodology,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 177–185, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yi, J., Jiao, L., Wang, X., Xiang, J., Yuan, M., and Gao, S., “Surface Roughness Models and their Experimental Validation in Micro Milling of 6061-T6 Al Alloy by Response Surface Methodology,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2015, Article ID: 702186, 2015.

  17. Zhang, S., Li, J., Sun, J., and Jiang, F., “Tool Wear and Cutting Forces Variation in High-Speed End-Milling Ti-6Al-4V Alloy,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 69–78, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weule, H., Hüntrup, V., and Tritschler, H., “Micro-Cutting of Steel to Meet New Requirements in Miniaturization,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 61–64, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, K., Liang, Y.-C., Zheng, K.-N., Bai, Q.-S., and Chen, W.-Q., “Tool Edge Radius Effect on Cutting Temperature in Micro-End-Milling Process,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 52, Nos. 9-12, pp. 905–912, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao, M., Sato, K., Karube, S., and Soutome, T., “The Effect of Tool Nose Radius in Ultrasonic Vibration Cutting of Hard Metal,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 43, No. 13, pp. 1375–1382, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montgomery, D. C., “Design and Analysis of Experiments,” John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aramcharoen, A. and Mativenga, P., “Size Effect and Tool Geometry in Micromilling of Tool Steel,” Precision Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 402–407, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., and Anderson-Cook, C. M., “Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments,” John Wiley & Sons, 2016.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong, Y.-C., Ha, S.-J., and Cho, M.-W., “Predicting of Cutting Forces in a Micromilling Process Based on Frequency Analysis of Sensor Signals and Modified Polynomial Neural Network Algorithm,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 17–23, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Miranda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miranda, M., Serje, D., Pacheco, J. et al. Tool edge radius wear and material removal rate performance charts for titanium micro-milling. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19, 79–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0009-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0009-z

Keywords

Navigation