Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental comparison of Bernoulli gripper and vortex gripper

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Bernoulli gripper and a vortex gripper are types of pneumatic grippers that have similar functions but different working principles. They are widely used for performing gripping, transferring, and placing operations in automated production lines. This study systematically compares the two grippers and provides an objective reference to enable users to choose an appropriate gripper. First, we present the working principles of both grippers. Then, we measure the curves of suction force, air consumption, and upstream pressure; furthermore, we analyze and compare the energy consumption from the viewpoint of the entire pneumatic system. The results reveal the relationships with the air consumption and total energy consumption. Next, we measure the pressure distribution formed on the upper surface of the workpiece. From the experimental results, the principles of the two grippers are stated and compared. Furthermore, we use the pressure distribution data to estimate the deformation and inner stress of the workpiece. The influence of the grippers on the workpiece are analyzed and compared from a material mechanics viewpoint. Finally, we use three types of rough surfaces to qualitatively evaluate and compare the performance of the grippers when gripping a workpiece with a rough surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

bending stiffness

E :

Young’s modulus

Ė gripper :

gripper’s energy consumption

Ė system :

energy dissipation of the air supply system

Ė total :

total energy

g :

acceleration of gravity

h max :

optimal gap height

h w :

thickness of workpiece

M r :

radial bending moment

M a :

circumferential bending moment

P a :

atmospheric pressure

P c :

outlet pressure of air compressor

P u :

upstream pressure of gripper

q :

resultant load

Q :

flow rate in the standard state

r :

radius

R :

radius of circular glass workpiece

τ :

shear stress

δ :

deformation

v :

Poisson’s ratio

ρ :

density of workpiece

References

  1. Brun, X. F. and Melkote, S. N., “Analysis of Stresses and Breakage of Crystalline Silicon Wafers during Handling and Transport,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 93, No. 8, pp. 1238–1247, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isobe, H., Fushmi, M., Ootsuka, M., and Kyusojin, A., “Non-Contact Transportation of Flat Panel Substrate by Combined Ultrasonic Acoustic Viscous and Aerostatic Forces,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 44–48, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lundström, G., “Industrial Robot Grippers,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 72–82, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantriota, G., “Theoretical Model of the Grasp with Vacuum Gripper,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 2–17, 2007.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dini, G., Fantoni, G., and Failli, F., “Grasping Leather Plies by Bernoulli Grippers,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 21–24, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, X. and Kagawa, T., “Theoretical and Experimental Study of Factors Affecting the Suction Force of a Bernoulli Gripper,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 140, No. 9, Paper No. 04014066, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, S., Gray, J. O., and Caldwell, D. G., “An End Effector based on the Bernoulli Principle for Handling Sliced Fruit and Vegetables,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 249–257, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brun, X. F. and Melkote, S. N., “Modeling and Prediction of the Flow, Pressure, and Holding Force Generated by a Bernoulli Handling Device,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 3, Paper No. 031018, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, X., Kawashima, K., and Kagawa, T., “Analysis of Vortex Levitation,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1448–1454, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, X., Iio, S., Kawashima, K., and Kagawa, T., “Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of a Noncontact Handling Device using Air-Swirling Flow,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 137, No. 6, pp. 400–409, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xin, L., Zhong, W., Kagawa, T., Liu, H., and Tao, G., “Development of a Pneumatic Sucker for Gripping Workpieces with Rough Surface,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, DOI NO: 10.1109/TASE.2014.2361251, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Li, N., Tao, G. et al. Experimental comparison of Bernoulli gripper and vortex gripper. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16, 2081–2090 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0270-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0270-3

Keywords

Navigation