Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization process for concept design of tactical missiles by using pareto front and TOPSIS

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concept design requiring complicated feed-forward and feed-back processes makes it difficult for engineers to determine the global behaviors of design variables and objective functions in a design space. Although design of experiments and response surface models have been applied to overcome these problems, the design variables satisfying the objective functions can’t be found due to violations of given constraints. In this study, a new optimization process, i.e., the GEO (Generate, Explore and Optimize) process for the concept design of a tactical missile, based on a MOGA (Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm) was proposed, which was first adapted to generate a Pareto Front in order to simultaneously satisfy the constraints and the objective functions. In the first step, the weights between the objective functions were determined by using an AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Then, the design space exploration followed, and was implemented by surrogate models constructed from the Pareto Front with a neural network. In the last step, a TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and a desirability function were applied together to determine the optimal solution. The TOPSIS merged the multi-objective design problem to a single entity, and the desirability function normalized each objective function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C., “Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product in Optimization Using Designed Experiments,” John Wiley & Sons, pp. 208–341, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Castillo, E., “Process Optimization: a Statistical Approach,” Springer, pp. 85–147, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., “Multi-Objective Optimisation Using Evolutionary Algorithms: An Introduction,” in Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing, pp. 3–34, 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Konak, A., Coit, D. W., and Smith, A. E., “Multi-Objective Optimization using Genetic Algorithms: A Tutorial,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 91, No. 9, pp. 992–1007, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saaty, T. L., “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, K. K. and Han, S. H., “Optimization of Wind Turbine Pitch Controller by Neural Network Model Based on Latin Hypercube,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 1065–1071, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, K. K., Lee, K. H., and Han, S. H., “Use of an Orthogonal Array based on the Kriging Model to Maximize the Fatigue Life of a Turbine Blade,” International Journal of Structural Integrity, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 303–312, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eugene, L. F., “Tactical Missile Design,” AIAA Education Series, AIAA, pp. 1–18, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, K. K., Han, J. W., and Han, S. H., “TOPSIS-Based Multi-Objective Shape Optimization for a CRT Funnel,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 729–736, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frits, A. P., Fleeman, E. L., and Mavris, D. N., “Use of a Conceptual Sizing Tool for Conceptual Design of Tactical Missiles (U),” Proc. of the Missile Sciences Conference, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramu, M., Raja, V. P., Thyla, P., and Gunaseelan, M., “Design Optimization of Complex Structures Using Metamodels,” Jordan Journal of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 653–663, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamza, R. M. A., “Multi-Objective Neural Network Modeling for Improving Stud Arc Welding Process Joining,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 382–391, 2011.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. SAS Institute Inc., “JMP 10 User’s Guide,” 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munier, N., “A Strategy for Using Multicriteria Analysis in Decision-Making,” Springer, pp. 77–100, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Derringer, G., “Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 214–219, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Ho Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, KK., Lee, KH., Woo, ET. et al. Optimization process for concept design of tactical missiles by using pareto front and TOPSIS. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 1371–1376 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0478-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0478-7

Keywords

Navigation