Abstract
A damage reference database from armor piercing bullet hits was established for tube and plate specimens with different thicknesses. The penetration damage diameters of the tube specimens showed larger at the center than the periphery in the front, but they resulted larger at the periphery than the center in the rear. As the angle of attack of the plate specimens increased, the penetration damage diameters increased as well, with the penetration damage diameters becoming larger in the rear than the front. Using the damage reference database, the fatigue analysis was performed to determine whether the safety requirements for the military aircraft could be met.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- d :
-
diameter of tube specimen
- t :
-
thickness of tube and plate specimen
- θ :
-
angle of attack to live rounds test
- D :
-
penetration damage diameter
- T D :
-
total damage
- n i :
-
number of cycles at the i th stress level
- N i :
-
number of cycles to failure corresponding at the i th stress level
- L :
-
safety life
- σ eq :
-
equivalent stress
- N :
-
number of cycles
- S :
-
stress
References
John, G. E., “Design Manual for Impact Damage Tolerant Aircraft Structure,” AGARD-AG-238-ADD, 1981.
Jensen, J. E., “The Ballistic Damage Characteristics and Damage Tolerance of Wing Structural Elements,” Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM, pp. 215–229, 1971.
Donald, F. H., “Damage Tolerance of Semi-monocoque Aircraft: Specialists Meeting on Impact Damage Tolerance of Structures,” AGARD, 1976.
Anderson Jr., C. E., Hohler, V., Walker, J. D. and Stilp, A. J., “The influence of projectile hardness on ballistic performance,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 619–632, 1999.
Gupta, N. K. and Madhu, V., “An experimental study of normal and oblique impact of hard-core projectile on single and layered plates,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 5–6, pp. 395–414, 1997.
Gupta, N. K. and Madhu, V., “Normal and oblique impact of a kinetic energy projectile on mild steel plates,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 333–343, 1992.
U.S. Department of Defense, “Military Handbooks: Survivability, Aircraft, Nonnuclear, General Criteria — Vol. 1,” MIL-HDBK-336-1, 1982.
U.S. Department of Defense, “Military Handbooks: Survivability, Aircraft, Nonnuclear, Airframe — Vol. 2,” MILHDBK-336-2, 1983.
U.S. Department of Defense, “Military Standard: V50 Ballistic Test for Armor,” MIL-STD-662F, 1997.
Jena, P. K., Ramanjeneyulu, K., Kumar, K. S. and Bhat, T. B., “Ballistic studies on layered structures,” Materials and Design, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1922–1929, 2009.
Park, T. G., Choi, C. H., Won, J. H. and Choi, J. H., “An Efficient method for fatigue reliability analysis accounting for scatter of fatigue test data,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 429–437, 2010.
Lee, S. H., Park, T. W., Park, J. K., Yoon, J. W., Jun, K. J. and Jung, S. P., “A fatigue life analysis of wheels on guide-way vehicle using multi-body dynamics,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 79–84, 2009.
Bannantine, J. A., Comer, J. J. and Handrock, J. L., “Fundamentals of Metal Fatigue Analysis,” Prentice Hall, pp. 6–15, 1990.
U.S. Department of Defense, “Military Handbooks: Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structure,” MILHDBK-5H, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hur, JW. A study on the ballistic damage tolerance design of aircraft structure from armor piercing bullet hits. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12, 85–90 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0010-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0010-2