Abstract
The additive manufacturing of titanium alloy parts has important scientific significance and practical value. Controlling the distribution of residual stress caused by the high cooling rate and temperature gradient is the key to regulating the performance of devices obtained from additive manufacturing. In this work, the effects of the interlayer scanning angle on the residual stress in Ti–6Al–4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting were investigated by finite element simulations. We studied how changing the interlayer deflection angle alleviated residual stress under different energy inputs. The results showed that the residual stress in the z-direction was reduced by the deflection angle of 67° and 90°, and the non-uniform distribution of residual stress was reduced by a deflection angle of 67°. The combination of a chessboard pattern and interlayer deflection angle greatly alleviated the generation of residual stress. This work has important guiding significance for the additive manufacturing design of high-quality and high-performance titanium alloy devices.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Bartolomeu, S. Faria, O. Carvalho, E. Pinto, N. Alves, F.S. Silva, G. Miranda, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 663, 181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.113
A.T. Erturk, M.E. Bulduk, G. Tarakçi, G. Özer, E. Yarar, Met. Mater. Int. 28, 155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01038-y
M.D. Barath Kumar, M. Manikandan, Metals Mater. Int. 28, 54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01015-5
J.-B. Lee, D.-I. Seo, H.-Y. Chang, Met. Mater. Int. 27, 3095 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01085-5
A. Das, M. Shukla, Met. Mater. Int. 27, 2461 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00646-4
G. Li, L. Wang, W. Pan, F. Yang, W. Jiang, X. Wu, X. Kong, K. Dai, Y. Hao , Sci. Rep. 6, 34072 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34072
Y. Zheng, Q. Han, D. Li, F. Sheng, Z. Song, J. Wang, Mater. Design 197, 109219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109219
D. Gu, Y.-C. Hagedorn, W. Meiners, G. Meng, R.J.S. Batista, K. Wissenbach, R. Poprawe, Acta Mater. 60, 3849 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.006
P. Mercelis, J.P. Kruth, Rapid Prototyping J. 12, 254 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610707013
L. Parry, I.A. Ashcroft, R.D. Wildman, Addit. Manuf. 12, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.014
G. Vastola, G. Zhang, Q.X. Pei , Y.-W. Zhang, Addit. Manuf. 12, 231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.010
G.M. Karthik, H.S. Kim, Met. Mater. Int. 27, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00931-2
S. Lee, J. Kim, J. Choe, S.-W. Kim, J.-K. Hong, Yoon Suk Choi, Met. Mater. Int. 27, 78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00770-1
H. Galarraga, D.A. Lados, R.R. Dehoff, M.M. Kirka, P. Nandwana, Addit. Manuf. 10, 47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.02.003
A.M. Jonaet, H.S. Park, C.M. Lee, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 113, 2227 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06711-5
K. Guan, Z. Wang, M. Gao, X. Li, X. Zeng, Mater. Design 50, 581 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.056
Y.M Zou, Y.S. Wu, K.F Li, C.L. Tan, Z.G. Qiu, D.C. Zeng, Mater. Lett. 272, 127824 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127824
I. Yadroitsev, A. Gusarov, I. Yadroitsava, I. Smurov, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 210, 1624 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.010
W. Yan, Y. Qian, W. Ge, S. Lin, W.K. Liu, F. Lin, G.J. Wagner, Mater. Design 141, 210 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.031
Y. Lian, Z. Gan, C. Yu, D. Kats, W.K. Liu, G.J. Wagner, Mater. Design 169, 107672 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107672
M. Labudovic, D. Hu, R. Kovacevic, J. Mater. Sci. 38, 35 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021153513925
H.G. Li, T.L. Lee, W. Zheng, Y.Z. Lu, H.B.C. Yin, J.X. Yang, Y.J. Huang, J.F. Sun, Mater. Lett. 263, 127247 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127247
J. Cao, M.A. Gharghouri, P. Nash, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 237, 409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.032
Q. Liu, Y. Danlos, B. Song, B. Zhang, S. Yin, H. Liao, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 222, 61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.02.036
H. Ali, H. Ghadbeigi, K. Mumtaz, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 712, 175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.103
W. Zhang, M. Tong, N.M. Harrison, Addit. Manuf. 36, 101507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101507
V. Manvatkar, A. De, T. Debroy, Mater. Sci. Technol. 31, 924 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000701
A.V. Gusarov, J.-P. Kruth, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 48, 3423 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.01.044
W. Huang, Y. Zhang, J. Manuf. Process. 42, 139 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.019
F. Verhaeghe, T. Craeghs, J. Heulens, L. Pandelaers, Acta Mater. 57, 6006 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.027
A. Hussein, L. Hao, C. Yan, R. Everson, Mater. Design 52, 638 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070
W. Ya, B. Pathiraj, S. Liu, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 230, 217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.012
C. Chen, J. Yin, H. Zhu, Z. Xiao, L. Zhang, X. Zeng, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 145, 103433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103433
I. Yadroitsev, I. Yadroitsava, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 10, 67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1026045
J. Xu, Y. Ding, Y. Gao, H. Wang, Y. Hu, D. Zhang, Mater. Design 209, 109940 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109940
Y. Lu, S. Wu, Y. Gan, T. Huang, C. Yang, L. Junjie, J. Lin, Opt. Laser Technol. 75, 197 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.07.009
T. Mukherjee, W. Zhang, T. DebRoy, Comput. Mater. Sci. 126, 360 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.003
Y. Li, K. Zhou, P. Tan, S.B. Tor, C.K. Chua, K.F. Leong, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 136, 24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.001
E. Macherauch, in Application of Fracture Mechanics to Materials and Structures, ed. by G.C. Sih, E. Sommer, W. Dahl (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Hague, 1984), pp. 157–192
P. Tan, F. Shen, B. Li, K. Zhou, Mater. Design 168, 107642 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107642
J. Ahn, E. He, L. Chen, R.C. Wimpory, J.P. Dear, C.M. Davies, Mater. Design 115, 441 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.078
Z. Zheng, X. Jin, Y. Bai, Y. Yang, C. Ni, W.F. Lu, H. Wang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 831, 142236 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142236
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52171165) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191338).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Zhao, Y., Yang, W. et al. Novel Strategy for Reducing Residual Stress in Titanium Alloy Parts Obtained via Additive Manufacturing. Met. Mater. Int. 28, 3057–3067 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-022-01179-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-022-01179-8