Advertisement

Metals and Materials International

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 496–506 | Cite as

Failure Analysis of Pitted Copper Pipes Used in Underground Water and Preventive Measures

  • Gi-ho Nam
  • Jong-kwon Lee
  • Kyung-ja Kim
Article
  • 223 Downloads

Abstract

This study performed an experiment on the causes of pitting corrosion in a copper tubing used for a sprinkler system. Corrosion products of a copper tubing that sustained pitting corrosion were collected and cultured in Culture medium [Luria–Bertani, Brain heart infusion, Tryptic soy broth (TSB), R2A]. Four types of bacteria were found through identification: Micrococcus luteus sp (species)., Staphylococcus sp., Sphingomonas sp., and Bacillus sp. The copper toxicity test was performed for each microorganism. Among the four microorganisms, Micrococcus luteus sp. showed good growth in the environment containing copper ions. On the immersion test, changes in pH and Optical density were measured; On the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry test, the copper concentration of each culture medium was measured. The surface of each copper sample was observed using a scanning electron microscope. The corrosion potential of a copper sample, after 48 h exposure of the TSB medium containing Micrococcus luteus sp., was measured using a potentiodynamic polarization experiment. The next experiment was conducted to prevent microbial corrosion by suppressing the growth of microorganisms. Six 30 ml TSB culture media with controlled pH value of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 through HCl and NaOH were manufactured. Then the microorganisms were cultured in 37 °C 133 rpm, of which the growth status was checked every 24 h for 3 days. It was found that microorganisms did not grow on culture media with the pH value of 6 and lower. The same experiment conducted on culture media controlled with acetic acid, nitric acid, and sulfuric acid, also showed no growth of microorganisms on media with pH value of 6 and lower. Six 5 ml TSB culture media each containing 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.0312%, and 0.0156% NaOCl and NaOBr as germicides were manufactured. 0.01 μl of microorganisms were inoculated on the media and cultured in 37 °C for 48 h. It was found that microorganisms did not grow in media with NaOCl and NaOBr concentration of 0.0625% and higher. Therefore, it can be suggested that in environments with pH value of 6 or lower, or NaOCl and NaOBr concentration of higher than 0.0625% suppresses microbial growth, thereby preventing microbial corrosion.

Keywords

Copper pipes Pitting corrosion Microbiologically influenced corrosion Bacteria Micrococcus luteus 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

References

  1. 1.
    R.J. Oliphant, Causes of Copper Corrosions Plumbing Systems (Foundation for water Research, Allen House, Marlow, 2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Mattsson, Br. Corros. J. 15, 6 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.F. Lucy, Br. Corros. J. 7, 36 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.S. Campbell, J. Inst. Met. 77, 345 (1950)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jae-Bong Lee, Hoseok Jung, Corros. Sci. Technol. 13(1), 6–14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalo E. Pizarro, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(21), 7430–7436 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.J. Seed, Corros. Rev. 9(1/2), 2 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.J. Little, P.A. Wagner, F. Mansfeld, in Corrosion Testing Made Easy Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion, ed. by B.C. Syrett, (NACE International, Houston, 1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Ronay, I. Fesus, Z. Wolkober, in Proceedings of UK Corrosion’87 (Brighton, UK, 1987), pp. 263–78Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.J. Licina, Sourcebook for Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion in Nuclear Power Plants, EPRI NP-5580 (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, 1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.A. King, D. Geary, Advances in Offshore Oil and Gas Pipeline Technology (Gulf Publishing, Houston, 1985), pp. 107–116Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Kasahara, F. Kajiyama, K. Okamura, Zairyo-to-Kankyo 40, 12 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.J. Soracco, D.H. Pope, J.M. Eggars, T.N. Effiger, in Proceeding of CORROSION/88, St. Louis, MO, NACE International, Paper No. 83, USA (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.R. Fischer, H.H. Paradies, Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion Testing, ed. by J.R. Kearns, B.J. Little (ASTM STP 1232, Fredericksburg, 1994), p. 253Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.C. Dexter, H.J. Zhang, in Proceedings of 11th International Corr Congress, vol. 4 (Associazione Italiana di Metallurgia, Milano, 1990), p. 4333Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.A.H. von Wolzogen Kuhr, Corrosion 17, 119 (1961)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Reyes et al., Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 61(2), 135–141 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.B. Valcarce, S.R. De Sánchez, M. Vazquez, Corros. Sci. 47(3), 795–809 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    I.T. Vargas et al., Bioelectrochemistry 97, 15–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H.A. Videla, Manual of Biocorrosion (CRC Press Inc, Boca Ration, 1996), pp. 13–45Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W.G. Charaklis, M.H. Turakhia, N. Zelver, Biofilms, ed. by W.G. Characklis, K.C. Marshall (John Wiley, New York, 1990), pp. 265–340Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringSoonchunhyang UniversityAsanKorea
  2. 2.Department of Life ScienceSoonchunhyang UniversityAsanKorea

Personalised recommendations