Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and numerical analysis on aluminum/steel pipe using magnetic pulse welding

  • Published:
Metals and Materials International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, there has been a trend in the automotive industry to focus on the improvement of lightweight materials, such as aluminum and magnesium because the welding of dissimilar metals causes many welding defects. Magnetic pulse welding (MPW), one of the solid state welding technologies, uses electromagnetic force from current discharged through a working coil which develops a repulsive force between the induced currents flowing parallel and in the opposite direction in the tube to be welded. The objective of this paper is to develop a numerical model for analysis of the interaction between the outer pipe and the working coil using a finite element method (FEM) in the MPW process. Four Maxwell equations are solved using a general electromagnetic mechanics computer program, ANSYS/EMAG code. Experiments were also carried out with a W-MPW60 machine manufactured by WELMATE CO., LTD. with the Al1070 and SM45C for Al pipe and steel bar respectively. The calculated and measured results were compared to verify the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. B. Park, Ph.D. Thesis, p. 1, Seoul National University, Seoul (2004).

  2. V. Shribman, Y. Livschitz, and O. Gafri, Advanced Transmission Design & Performance 21, 116 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Hokari, T. Sato, K. Kawauchi, and A. Muto, J. Japan Welding Society 15(4), 615 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Li, Z. Zhao, J. Li, Y. Wang, and Y. Yang, J. Mater. Process 123, 225 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Zhang, Ph.D. Thesis, p. 183, Ohio state university, Ohio state (2003).

  6. N. Takatsu, M. Kato, and K. Sato, Int. J. JSME 31, 142 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. E. Azab, M. Garnkich, and A. Kapoor, Int. J. JMPT 142, 744 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. K. Fenton and G. S. Daehn, Int. J. JMPT 75, 6 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Haiping, L. Chunfeng, and D. Jianghua, J. MPT 209, 707 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Ito and H. Kobayashi, Advanced Engineering Materials 8, 828 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kochan, Assembly Automation 20, 129 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Lee, KSME 20, 476 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. G. Powers, Welding Journal 46, 507 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Bendjima, K. Srajrj, and M. A. Feliachi, IEEE Transactions of Magnetics 33, 1638 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Meriched, M. FelachiI, and H. Mohellebi, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 36, 1808 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Mahanian and D. B. Blackwell, ASME 4, 323 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Y. Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shim, J.Y., Kim, I.S., Lee, K.J. et al. Experimental and numerical analysis on aluminum/steel pipe using magnetic pulse welding. Met. Mater. Int. 17, 957–961 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-011-6014-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-011-6014-8

Keywords

Navigation