Genome-Wide Identification and Comparative Analysis of Copper Transporter Genes in Plants

Abstract

Copper (Cu) transporters have primary importance in maintenance of physiological limits of Cu homeostasis in plants. However, structural characterization of Cu transporters in many plant species is still limited. In this study, a total of 78 potential Cu transporter genes were identified from 18 different plant species. Study revealed that Cu transporters could be characterized with a CTR protein family (PF04145) domain, three putative transmembrane domains (TMDs), a single exon number, and a basic character. Met-rich motifs at N-terminal region, MXXXM motif in TMD-2, and GXXXG motif in TMD-3 could be essential for Cu transport since they were highly conserved in all analyzed species. In phylogeny, a clear distinction was observed between Cu transporter sequences of lower and higher plants. General topological features of Cu transporters in higher plants—monocots and dicots—were highly conserved compared to lower plants. Identification of Cu transporter homologous in various plant species and their comparative analysis at gene and protein levels will become valuable theoretical basis for future studies aiming to further characterization and molecular manipulation of Cu transporters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

TMD:

Transmembrane domain

aa:

Amino acid

Cu:

Copper

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

References

  1. 1.

    Marschner H (1995) Functions of mineral nutrients: macronutrients. Miner Nutr High Plants 2:379–396 (Academic Press, London)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sancenón V, Puig S, Mateu-Andrés I, Dorcey E, Thiele DJ, Peñarrubia L (2004) The Arabidopsis copper transporter COPT1 functions in root elongation and pollen development. J Biol Chem 279:15348–15355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yruela I (2005) Copper in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 17:145–156

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Clemens S (2001) Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 212:475–486

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huffman DL, O’Halloran TV (2001) Function, structure, and mechanism of intracellular copper trafficking proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 70:677–701

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Burkhead JL, Gogolin RKA, Abdel-Ghany SE, Cohu CM, Pilon M (2009) Copper homeostasis. New Phytol 182:799–816

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pilon M, Cohu CM, Ravet K, Abdel-Ghany SE, Gaymard F (2009) Essential transition metal homeostasis in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:347–357

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Puig S, Peñarrubia L (2009) Placing metal micronutrients in context: transport and distribution in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:299–306

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Puig S, Lee J, Lau M, Thiele DJ (2002) Biochemical and genetic analyses of yeast and human high affinity copper transporters suggest a conserved mechanism for copper uptake. J Biol Chem 277:26021–26030

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Eisses JF, Kaplan JH (2002) Molecular characterization of hCTR1, the human copper uptake protein. J Biol Chem 277:29162–29171

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jiang J, Nadas IA, Kim MA, Franz KJ (2005) A Mets motif peptide found in copper transport proteins selectively binds Cu (I) with methionine-only coordination. Inorg Chem 44:9787–9794

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Beaudoin J, Laliberté J, Labbé S (2006) Functional dissection of Ctr4 and Ctr5 amino-terminal regions reveals motifs with redundant roles in copper transport. Microbiology 152:209–222

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Page MD, Kropat J, Hamel PP, Merchant SS (2009) Two Chlamydomonas CTR copper transporters with a novel cys-met motif are localized to the plasma membrane and function in copper assimilation. Plant Cell Online 21:928–943

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Peñarrubia L, Andrés-Colás N, Moreno J, Puig S (2010) Regulation of copper transport in Arabidopsis thaliana: a biochemical oscillator? J Biol Inorg Chem 15:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aller SG, Unger VM (2006) Projection structure of the human copper transporter CTR1 at 6-Å resolution reveals a compact trimer with a novel channel-like architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3627–3632

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Aller SG, Eng ET, De Feo CJ, Unger VM (2004) Eukaryotic CTR copper uptake transporters require two faces of the third transmembrane domain for helix packing, oligomerization, and function. J Biol Chem 279:53435–53441

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wu X, Sinani D, Kim H, Lee J (2009) Copper transport activity of yeast Ctr1 is down-regulated via its C terminus in response to excess copper. J Biol Chem 284:4112–4122

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yamasaki H, Hayashi M, Fukazawa M, Kobayashi Y, Shikanai T (2009) SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein—like7 is a central regulator for copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 21:347–361

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Abdel-Ghany SE, Pilon M (2008) MicroRNA-mediated systemic down-regulation of copper protein expression in response to low copper availability in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 283:15932–15945

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Romiti M (2010) Entrez nucleotide and entrez protein FAQs. Gene 1:270

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, Rokhsar DS (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D1178–D1186

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD et al (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker John M (ed) The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana, Totowa, pp 571–607

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK (2006) Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins 64:643–651

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Durbin R (1997) Pfam: a comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins 28:405–420

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bernsel A, Viklund H, Falk J, Lindahl E, von Heijne G, Elofsson A (2008) Prediction of membrane-protein topology from first principles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:7177–7181

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Guo AY, Zhu QH, Chen X, Luo JC (2007) GSDS: a gene structure display server. Yi chuan = Hereditas/Zhongguo yi chuan xue hui bian ji 29:1023–1026

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Timothy L, Mikael Bodén B, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37:202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y (2015) The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods 12:7–8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL molecular graphics system

  32. 32.

    Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, de Bakker PI, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson DC (2003) Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins 50:437–450

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Jensen LJ (2013) STRING v9. 1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D808–D815

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yang Z, Wang X, Gu S, Hu Z, Xu H, Xu C (2008) Comparative study of SBP-box gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Gene 407:1–11

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Amaravadi R, Glerum DM, Tzagoloff A (1997) Isolation of a cDNA encoding the human homolog of COX17, a yeast gene essential for mitochondrial copper recruitment. Hum Genet 99:329–333

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nury H, Dahout-Gonzalez C, Trezeguet V, Lauquin GJM, Brandolin GA, Pebay-Peyroula E (2006) Relations between structure and function of the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier. Annu Rev Biochem 75:713–741

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Morrissey J, Baxter IR, Lee J, Li L, Lahner B, Grotz N, Guerinot ML (2009) The ferroportin metal efflux proteins function in iron and cobalt homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 21:3326–3338

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Andrés-Colás N, Sancenón V, Rodríguez-Navarro S, Mayo S, Thiele DJ, Ecker JR, Peñarrubia L (2006) The Arabidopsis heavy metal P-type ATPase HMA5 interacts with metallochaperones and functions in copper detoxification of roots. Plant J 45:225–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Binder BM, Rodríguez FI, Bleecker AB (2010) The copper transporter RAN1 is essential for biogenesis of ethylene receptors in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 285:37263–37270

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Puig S, Mira H, Dorcey E, Sancenon V, Andrés-Colás N, Garcia-Molina A, Penarrubia L (2007) Higher plants possess two different types of ATX1-like copper chaperones. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 354:385–390

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gebert M, Meschenmoser K, Svidová S, Weghuber J, Schweyen R, Eifler K, Knoop V (2009) A root-expressed magnesium transporter of the MRS2/MGT gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana allows for growth in low-Mg2+ environments. Plant Cell Online 21:4018–4030

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ertugrul Filiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vatansever, R., Ozyigit, I.I. & Filiz, E. Genome-Wide Identification and Comparative Analysis of Copper Transporter Genes in Plants. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci 9, 278–291 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-016-0150-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Motif signature
  • Transmembrane domain (TMD)
  • N-terminal
  • C-terminal