Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification and characterization of alkaline protease producing Bacillus firmus species EMBS023 by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 March 2015

Abstract

Probiotic microorganisms are those which exert a positive e®ect on the growth of the host, when administered as a dietary mixture in an adequate amount. They form the best alternative to the use of antibiotics for controlling enteric diseases in poultry farm animals, especially in the light of the gruesome problems of development of antibiotic resistance in enteric pathogens and the contamination of poultry products with antibiotics. 16S rDNA sequencing which has gained wide popularity amongst microbiologists for the molecular characterization and identification of newly discovered isolates provides accurate identification of isolates down to the level of sub-species (strain). It’s most important advantage over the traditional biochemical characterization methods are that it can provide an accurate identification of strains with atypical phenotypic characters as well. The following work is an application of 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach to identify a novel, alkaline protease producing bacteria, from poultry farm waste. The sample was collected from a local poultry farm in the Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Subsequently the sample was serially diluted and the aliquots were incubated for a suitable time period following which the suspected colony was subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing. The results showed the isolate to be a novel, high alkaline protease producing bacteria, which was named Bacillus firmus isolate EMBS023, after characterization the sequence of isolate was deposited in GenBank with accession number JN990980.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuller R. J Appl Bacteriol 1989 66: 365 [PMID: 2666378]

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Balcazar J et al. Vet Microbiol 2006 114: 173 [PMID: 16490324]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong H, Duc L and Cutting S. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2005 29: 813 [PMID: 16102604]

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Duc L et al. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004 70: 2161 [PMC383048].

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazza P. Boll Chim Farm 1994 133: 3 [PMID: 8166962].

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marteau P, De-Vrese M, Cellier C, and Schrezenmeir J. Am J Clin Nutr 2001 73: 430S [PMID: 11157353].

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbosa T et al. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005 71: 968 [PMID: 15691955].

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanders M, Morelli L, and Tompkins T. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2003 2: 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spinosa M et al. Research in Microbiology 2000 151: 361 [PMID: 10919516].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuohy K et al. J Appl Microbiol 2007 102: 1026 [PMID: 17381746].

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P and Verstraete W. Microbiol Mol Biol R 2000 64: 655 [PMC99008].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fredrickson A & Stephanopoulos G. Science 1981 213: 972 [PMID: 7268409].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemos M, Dopazo C, Toranzo A, and Barja J. J Appl Bacteriol 1991 71: 228 [PMID: 1955417].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pybus V, Loutit M, Lamont I, and Tagg J. J Fish Dis 1994 17: 311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams S & Vickers J. Microb Ecol 1986 12: 43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruno M & Montville T. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 3003 [PMC182399].

  17. Vandenbergh P. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1993 12: 221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugita H et al. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997 63: 4986 [PMC168829].

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith P & Davey S. J Fish Dis 1993 16: 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farzanfar A. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006 48: 149 [PMID: 17064272].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kabir S. Int J Mol Sci 2009 10: 3531 [PMC2812824].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Patterson J & Burkholder K. Poult Sci 2003 82: 627 [PMID: 12710484]

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Griggs J & Jacob J. J Appl Poult Res 2005 14: 750 [PMID: 15844827]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nurmi E & Rantala M. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 1973 241: 210 [PMID: 4700893].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jin L, Ho Y, Abdullah N & Jalaludin S. Poult Sci 1998 77: 1259 [PMID: 9733111].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cole C, Fuller R and Newport M. Food Microbiol 1987 4: 83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nahaston S, Nakaue H and Mirosh L. Poult Sci 1992 71: 111.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kabir S, Rahman M.M, Rahman M.B and Ahmed S. Int J Poult Sci 2004 3 361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haghighi H et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005 12: 1387 [PMID: 16339061].

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dierck N. Arch Anim Nutr Berl. 1989 39: 241 [PMID: 2665690].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prokesová L, Nováová M, Julák J and Mára M. Folia Microbiologica 1994 39: 501 [PMID: 8549999].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. L. Prokešová et al. Folia Microbiologica 2002 47: 193 [PMID: 12058402].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Woo P et al. J Med Microbiol 2009 58: 1030 [PMID: 19528178].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Woo P et al. Clin Microbiol Infec 2008 14: 908 [PMID: 18828852].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Clarridge J. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004 17: 840 [PMID: 15489351].

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lal D, Verma M and Lal R. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2011 10: 28 [PMC3151204].

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Janda J & Abbott S. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 45: 2761 [PMID: 17626177].

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Olsen G, Woese C and Overbeek R. J Bacteriol 1994 176: 1 [PMC205007].

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Woese C. Microbiol Rev. 1987 51: 221.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Palys T, Nakamura L and Cohan F. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47: 1145.

  41. Fox G et al. PNAS 1977 74: 4537 [PMID: 16592452].

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta R Lanter J and Woese C. Science 1983 221: 656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Woese C, Kandler O and Wheelis M. PNAS 1990 87: 4576 [PMID: 2112744].

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Snel B, Bork P and Huynen M. Nat Genet 1999 21: 108 [PMID: 9916801].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Patel J. Mol Diagn 2001 6: 313 [PMID: 11774196].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Woo P et al. J Med Microbiol 2002 51: 740 [PMID: 12358064].

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Woo P et al. J Clin Microbiol 2000 38: 3515 [PMID: PMC87424].

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Heller R et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996 15: 172 [PMID: 8801093].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anuraj Nayarisseri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

wishard, R., Jaiswal, M., Parveda, M. et al. Identification and characterization of alkaline protease producing Bacillus firmus species EMBS023 by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci 6, 271–278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-014-0187-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-014-0187-z

Key words

Navigation