Evolving Systems

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 19–33 | Cite as

Fuzzy cognitive maps as a decision support tool for container transport logistics

Original Paper
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we present Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, a well established decision making technique that combines Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic, for making decisions regarding Container Transport Logistics. A Fuzzy Cognitive Map is created based on the knowledge extracted by a domain expert. Based on this knowledge, a model of the interactions and causal relations among various key Logistics factors is created. The evolution of this Fuzzy Cognitive Map, imitates the cognitive processes of a decision maker during reasoning. Having the FCM created, it is examined both statically and dynamically. A number of scenarios are introduced and the decision making capabilities of the technique are presented by simulating these scenarios and finding the predicted outcomes according to the evolution of the FCM model and the expert’s knowledge. FCM’s predicted consequences of specific decisions can be valuable to decision makers since they can test their decisions and proceed with them only if the results are desirable.

Keywords

Fuzzy cognitive maps Decision making Container transport logistics Decision support tools 

References

  1. Ahmadi S, Forouzideh N, Alizadeh S, Papageorgiou E (2015) Learning fuzzy cognitive maps using imperialist competitive algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 26(6):1333–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeloudis P, Greco L, Bell M (2015) Strategic maritime container transport design in oligopolistic markets. Transp Res Proced 9:269–282 (ISSN 2352-1465) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod R (1976) Structure of decision. The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (1984) Rule-based expert systems. The MYCIN experiments of the Stanford heuristic programming project. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebeling CE (2009) Evolution of a box. Invent Technol 23(4):8–9 (ISSN 8756-7296) Google Scholar
  6. Gkonis K, Psaraftis H (2010) Container transportation as an interdependent security problem. J Transp Secur 3(4):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glykas M (ed) (2010) Fuzzy cognitive maps—advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 247. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Hart JA (1977) Cognitive maps of three Latin American policy makers. World Polit 30:115–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsu W-KK (2013) Improving the service operations of container terminals. Int J Logist Manag 24(1):101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khan MS, Quaddus M (2004) Group decision support using fuzzy cognitive maps for causal reasoning. Group Decis Negot 13:463–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khan MS, Chong A, Gedeon T (2000) A methodology for developing adaptive fuzzy cognitive maps for decision support. J Adv Comput Intell 4(6):403–407Google Scholar
  12. Kim MC, Kim CO, Hong SR, Kwon IH (2008) Forward–backward analysis of RFID-enabled supply chain using fuzzy cognitive map and genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 35(3):1166–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man-Mach Stud 24:65–75CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosko B (1992) Neural networks and fuzzy systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=129386
  15. Levinson M (2006) The box: how the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. ISBN 0-691-12324-1Google Scholar
  16. Li G, Peng Q (2011) The development of the material management system based on ontology and fuzzy cognitive map. Adv Intell Soft Comput 106:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meisel F (2009) Seaside operations planning in container terminals. Contributions to management science. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2191-8
  18. Motlagh O, Jamaludin Z, Tang SH, Khaksar W (2015) An agile FCM for real-time modeling of dynamic and real-life systems. Evol Syst 6(3):153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nasir S (2014) Intermodal container transport logistics to and from Malaysian ports—evaluation of customer requirements and environmental effects. Doctoral Thesis in Transport Science, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Division of Transport and Logistics, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  20. Nossack J, Pesch E (2013) A truck scheduling problem arising in intermodal container transportation. Eur J Oper Res 230(3):666–680 (ISSN 0377-2217) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Papageorgiou E (2012) Fuzzy Cognitive Map software tool for treatment management of uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 105(3):233–245Google Scholar
  22. Papageorgiou E (2013) Review study on fuzzy cognitive maps and their applications during the last decade. In: Glykas M (ed) Business process management. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 444. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 281–298Google Scholar
  23. Papageorgiou E (ed) (2014) Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering—from fundamentals to extensions and learning algorithms. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 54. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts FR (1976) Strategy for the energy crisis: the case of commuter transportation policy. In: Axelrod R (ed) Structure of decision. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 142–179Google Scholar
  25. Rose G (2013) Ninety percent of everything: inside shipping, the invisible industry that puts clothes on your back, gas in your car, and food on your plate. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Rozic T, Petrovic M, Ogrizovic D (2014) Container transport flows as a prerequisite for determination of inland terminal location. Sci J Marit Res 28:3–9Google Scholar
  27. Shi X, Tao D, Vob S (2011) RFID technology and its application to port-based container logistics. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 21(4):332–347Google Scholar
  28. Stach W, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (2005) Genetic learning of fuzzy cognitive maps. Fuzzy Sets Syst 153(3):371–401MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Taber R, Yager RR, Helgason CM (2006) Quantization effects on the equilibrium behavior of combined fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Intell Syst 22(2):181–202CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Ting SL, Wang LX, Ip WH (2012) A study of RFID adoption for vehicle tracking in a container terminal. J Ind Eng Manag 5(1):22–52Google Scholar
  31. Trappey AJC, Trappey CV, Wu C-R, Hsu F-C (2009) Using fuzzy cognitive map for evaluation of RFID-based reverse logistics services. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 1510–1515Google Scholar
  32. Trappey AJC, Trappey CV, Wu C (2010) Genetic algorithm dynamic performance evaluation for RFID reverse logistic management. Expert Syst Appl 37(11):7329–7335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsadiras ΑΚ (2008) Comparing the inference capabilities of binary, trivalent and sigmoid fuzzy cognitive maps. Inf Sci 178(20):3880–3894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsadiras Α, Bassiliades N (2013) RuleML representation and simulation of fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert Syst Appl 40:1413–1426Google Scholar
  35. Tsadiras AK, Margaritis KG (1996) Using certainty neurons in fuzzy cognitive maps. Neural Netw World 6:719–728Google Scholar
  36. Tsadiras ΑΚ, Margaritis KG (1997) Cognitive mapping and certainty neuron fuzzy cognitive maps. Inf Sci 101:109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang R, Zhao X, Yu W, Zou W (2008) The study on empty containers allocation in the container transportation. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, 2008. IEEM 2008. Singapore, pp 1678–1683Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations