Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Associations Between Cancer Fatalism, Causal Attributions, and Perceptions of Benefits and Barriers to Screening for Colorectal Cancer

  • Full length manuscript
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to assess the associations between cancer causal attributions (divine providence, chance or luck, environmental or genetic factors, weak personal resilience), cancer fatalistic beliefs (cancer occurrence and outcome beliefs), and benefits of and barriers to screening for early detection of colorectal cancer.

Methods

It was a cross-sectional study of 252 individuals (46% men and 54% women) aged 50–75. Participants completed measures of cancer causal attributions, Powe’s cancer fatalism questionnaire, and the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening subscales of the health belief model. The study model was assessed using path analysis and mediation tests.

Results

Participants expressed moderate levels of occurrence and outcome of fatalistic beliefs, moderate levels of causal attributions, a high level of perception of the benefits of screening, and a moderate level of barriers to screening. The path model showed good fit measures (χ2 = 17.38, df = 14, p = .24; χ2/df = 1.24; NFI = .98; TLI = .99; CFI = .99; RMSEA = .03, 90% CI = .01, .07). Outcome fatalism mediated the relationship between each causal attribution and perceived barriers, whereas occurrence fatalism mediated only the relationship between the causal attribution of divine providence and the perceived benefits of screening.

Conclusions

The results add to our understanding of the effects of causal attributions and fatalistic beliefs on perceptions of benefits and barriers to screening; hence, these factors should be the focus of change to reduce barriers to screening for early detection of cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis R, Campbell R, Hildon Z, Hobbs L, Michie S. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):323–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Ann Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall S, French DP, Marteau TM. Causal attributions following serious unexpected negative events: systematic review. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2003;22(5):515–36. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.22.5.515.22924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Green EC, Murphy E. Health belief model. In: Cockerham WC, Dingwall R, Quah S, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons; 2014: 766–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs410

  5. Carpenter C. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun. 2010;25(8):661–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.521906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bai Y, Wong CL, Peng X, So WKW. Colonoscopy screening behaviour and associated factors amongst first-degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer in China: testing the health belief model using a cross-sectional design. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144927.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. He L, Gao S, Tao S, et al. Factors associated with colonoscopy compliance based on health belief model in a community-based colorectal cancer screening program Shanghai. China Int Q Community Health Educ. 2020;41(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X19897356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. von Wagner C, Bonello B, Stoffel ST, Skrobanski H, Kerrison R, McGregor LM. Predictors of intention translation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Health Psychol. 2019;38(12):1083–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khani Jeihooni A, Kashfi SM, Shokri A, Kashfi SH, Karimi S. Investigating factors associated with FOBT screening for colorectal cancer based on the components of health belief model and social support. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017; 18(8): 2163–2169. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2163

  10. Williams RM, Wilkerson T, Holt CL. The role of perceived benefits and barriers in colorectal cancer screening in intervention trials among African Americans. Health Educ Res. 2018;33(3):205–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyy013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Champion VL, Miller T. Predicting mammography utilization through model generation. Psychol Health Med. 1996;1(3):273–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548509608402224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azaiza F, Cohen M, Awad M, Daoud F. Factors associated with low screening for breast cancer in the Palestinian authority: relations of availability, barriers fatalism. Cancer. 2010;116(19):4646–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen M, Azaiza F. Early breast cancer detection practices, health beliefs, and cancer worries in Jewish and Arab women. Prev Med. 2005;41(5–6):852–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanner-Smith EE, Brown TN. Evaluating the health belief model: a critical review of studies predicting mammographic and pap screening. Soc Theor Health. 2010;8(1):95–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2009.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tari Selcuk K, Avci D, Yilmaz Dundar G, Marcan Y. Breast cancer screening behaviors in women aged 40 years and over in a semi-urban region in Turkey: relationships with health beliefs. Healthcare. 2020;8(2):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020171.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vadaparampil ST, Champion VL, Miller TK, Menon U, Skinner CS. Using the health belief model to examine differences in adherence to mammography among African-American and Caucasian women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2004;21(4):59–79. https://doi.org/10.1300/J077v21n04_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Azaiza F, Cohen M. Colorectal cancer screening, intentions, and predictors in Jewish and Arab Israelis: a population-based study. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(4):478–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106297045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(4):339–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9100-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Honda K, Kagawa-Singer M. Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med. 2006;29(5):449–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9068-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Houlihan S. Dual-process models of health-related behaviour and cognition: a review of theory. Public Health. 2018;156:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.11.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen M. An integrated view of cultural perceptions of cancer among Arab people in Israel. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(4):490–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.816205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Powe BD. Fatalism among elderly African American: effects on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Nurs. 1995;18(5):385–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-199510000-00008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Powe BD, Finnie R. Cancer fatalism: the state of the science. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26(6):454–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200312000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Powe BD, Hamilton J, Brooks P. Perceptions of cancer fatalism and cancer knowledge: a comparison of older and younger African American women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24(4):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1300/J077v24n04_01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baron-Epel O, Friedman N, Lernau O. Fatalism and mammography in a multicultural population. Oncol Forum. 2009;36(3):353–61. https://doi.org/10.1188/09.ONF.353-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Straughan PT, Seow A. Fatalism conceptualized: a concept to predict health screening behavior. J Gender Culture Health. 1998;3(2):85–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023278230797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Espinosa LMK, Gallo LC. The relevance of fatalism in the study of Latina’s cancer screening behavior: a systematic review of the literature. Behav Med. 2011;18(4):310–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-010-9119-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen M. Cancer fatalism: attitudes toward screening and care. In: Carr BI, Steel J, eds. Psychological Aspects of Cancer. New York, NY, US: Springer; 2013: 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4866-2_6

  29. Crosby RA, Collins T. Correlates of community-based colorectal cancer screening in a rural population: the role of fatalism. J Rural Health. 2017;33(4):402–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Clarke N, Kearney PM, Gallagher P, McNamara D, O’Morain CA, Sharp L. Negative emotions and cancer fatalism are independently associated with uptake of faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: results from a population-based study. Prev Med. 2021;145: 106430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen M, Rosenfeld M, Greenblatt-Kimron L. Development and validation of the Fatalistic Causal Attributions of Cancer Questionnaire: a three-phase study. Psychooncology. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5531.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The common-sense representations of illness and danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Contributions to medical psychology. Oxford, England: Pergamon; 1980. p. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. Population of Israel on the eve of 2020 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.cbs.gov.il/en/mediarelease/Pages/2019/Population-of-Israel-on-the-Eve-of-2020.aspx.

  34. Mayo RM, Ureda JR, Parker VG. Importance of fatalism in understanding mammography screening in rural elderly women. J Women Aging. 2001;13(1):57–72. https://doi.org/10.1300/j074v13n01_05.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Powe BD. Cancer fatalism among elderly Caucasians and African Americans. Oncology Nurs Forum. 1995;22(9):1355–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Champion VL. Instrument development for the health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci. 1984;6(3):73–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198404000-00011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Coppock A. 10 things to know about multiple comparisons [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Feb 26]. Available from: https://egap.org/resource/10-things-to-know-about-multiple-comparisons.

  38. Goldblatt H, Cohen M, Azaiza A, Manassa R. Being within or being between? The cultural context of Arab women’s experience of coping with breast cancer in Israel. Psychooncology. 2013;22(4):869–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Baron-Epel O, Granot M, Badarna S, Avrami S. Perceptions of breast cancer among Arab Israeli women. Women Health. 2004;40(2):101–16. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v40n02_07.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leyva B, Allen JD, Tom LS, Ospino H, Torres MI, Abraido-Lanza AF. Religion, fatalism, and cancer control: a qualitative study among Hispanic Catholics. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(6):839–49. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.38.6.6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Abraido-Lanza AF, Martins MC, Shelton RC, Flórez KR. Breast cancer screening among Dominican Latinas: a closer look at fatalism and other social and cultural factors. Health EducBehav. 2015;42(5):633–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115580975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen M, Azaiza F. Developing and testing an instrument for identifying culture-specific barriers to breast cancer screening in Israeli Arab women. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(8):1570–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802078069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Freund A, Cohen M, Azaiza F. The doctor is just a messenger: beliefs of ultraorthodox Jewish women in regard to breast cancer and screening. J Religion Health. 2013;53(4):1075–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9695-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hughes AG, Watanabe-Galloway S, Schnell P, Soliman AS. Rural-urban differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers in Nebraska. J Community Health. 2015;40(6):1065–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0032-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. National Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health, Israeli State. Updated data on prevalence and death of cancer for 2018. https://www.health.gov.il/UnitsOffice/HD/ICDC/ICR/Pages/default.aspx

  46. Cohen M, Azaiza F. Increasing breast examinations among Arab women using a tailored culture-based intervention. Behav Med. 2010;36(3):92–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964280903521313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Miri Cohen & Michal Rosenfeld

  2. School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

    Lee Greenblatt-Kimron

Authors
  1. Miri Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michal Rosenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lee Greenblatt-Kimron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miri Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, M., Rosenfeld, M. & Greenblatt-Kimron, L. Associations Between Cancer Fatalism, Causal Attributions, and Perceptions of Benefits and Barriers to Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Int.J. Behav. Med. 29, 357–366 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10023-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10023-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation