Several national public health guidelines recommend individuals to minimize time spent in prolonged, continuous periods of sitting. Developing effective interventions to break up sitting, however, requires in-depth understanding of the behavior as well as identification of the key elements that need to be targeted to achieve change. This qualitative study focused on university students—a highly sedentary group—with the aim of the following: (i) exploring the factors influencing prolonged sitting time in this population; and (ii) identifying potential avenues for future intervention, based on the Behavior Change Wheel framework.
Eighteen ambulatory undergraduate students participated in semi-structured one-on-one interviews, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model and the complementary Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the theoretical framework. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, followed by inductive thematic analysis.
All COM-B components and eight TDF domains were identified as relevant for influencing the target behavior.
Findings suggest that interventions and policies aimed at reducing prolonged sitting time in university students should (i) raise awareness about negative health implications; (ii) address productivity concerns; (iii) provide training in behavioral self-regulation; (iv) use external reminders; (v) implement habit formation techniques; and (vi) promote social acceptability for breaking up sitting.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, et al. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:75.
Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:123–32.
Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, de Sá TH, Smith AD, Sharp SJ, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33:811–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1.
Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55:2895–905.
Zhai L, Zhang Y, Zhang D. Sedentary behaviour and the risk of depression: a meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:705–9.
Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41:207–15.
Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388:1302–10.
Cotten E, Prapavessis H. Increasing nonsedentary behaviors in university students using text messages: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth. 2016;4:e99. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5411.
Castro O, Bennie J, Vergeer I, Bosselut G, Biddle SHJ. How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Sci. 2020;21:332–43.
Fountaine CJ, Liguori GA, Mozumdar A, Schuna JM. Physical activity and screen time sedentary behaviors in college students. Int J Exerc Sci. 2011;4:3.
Farinola MG, Bazán NE. Sedentary behavior and physical activity in university students: a pilot study. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2011;79:8.
Moulin MS, Irwin JD. An assessment of sedentary time among undergraduate students at a Canadian university. Int J Exerc Sci. 2017;10:1116–29.
Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. Washington, DC: US Government Printing; 2000.
Department of Health. Australia’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines for adults (18–64 years). Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Health; 2014.
Fuzeki E, Vogt L, Banzer W. German national physical activity recommendations for adults and older adults: methods, database and rationale. Gesundheitswesen. 2017;2:20–8.
Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Protection. UK chief medical officers’ physical activity guidelines. London: Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Protection; 2019.
Bellettiere J, LaMonte MJ, Evenson KR, et al. Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease in older women. Circulation. 2019;13:1036–46. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035312.
Diaz KM, Howard VJ, Hutto B, Colabianchi N, Vena JE, Safford MM, et al. Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in US middle-aged and older adults: a national cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:465–75.
Benatti FB, Ried-Larsen M. The effects of breaking up prolonged sitting time: a review of experimental studies. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2053–61.
Todd AI, Bennett AI, Chrisitie CJ. Physical implications of prolonged sitting in a confined posture: a literature review. J Ergo S Afr. 2007;19:7–21.
Bailey DP, Locke CD. Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18:294–8.
Paing AC, McMillan KA, Kirk AF, Collier A, Hewitt A, Chastin SF. Dose–response between frequency of interruption of sedentary time and fasting glucose, the dawn phenomenon and night-time glucose in type 2 diabetes. Diab Med. 2019;36:376–82.
Dunstan DW, Howard B, Healy GN, Owen N. Too much sitting–a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97:368–76.
Felez-Nobrega M, Hillman CH, Dowd KP, Cirera E, Puig-Ribera A. ActivPAL™ determined sedentary behaviour, physical activity and academic achievement in college students. J Sports Sci. 2018;36:2311–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1451212.
Cole JA, Tully MA, Cupples ME. ‘They should stay at their desk until the work’s done’: a qualitative study examining perceptions of sedentary behaviour in a desk-based occupational setting. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1670-2.
MacDonald B, Fitzsimons C, Niven A. Using the COM-B model of behaviour to understand sitting behaviour in UK office workers. Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2018;14:23.
Helton WS, Russell PN. Rest is best: the role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance. Cognition. 2015;134:165–73.
Young MS, Robinson S, Alberts P. Students pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active Learn High Educ. 2009;10:41–55.
Wennberg P, Boraxbekk CJ, Wheeler M, Howard B, Dempsey PC, Lambert G, et al. Acute effects of breaking up prolonged sitting on fatigue and cognition: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009630.
Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.654964.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel. A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.
Deliens T, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Clarys P. Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:201.
Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25:1229–45.
Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12:77.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. London: Routledge; 2013.
Francis JJ, Stockton C, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Cuthbertson BH, Grimshaw JM, et al. Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14:625–46.
Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015;25:1212–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501.
Alley SJ, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ, Short CE, Maher JP, Schoeppe S, et al. Should I sit or stand: likelihood of adherence to messages about reducing sitting time. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:871.
Smith L, Pedersen S, Cooley P. The effect of education on compliance to a workplace health and wellbeing intervention: closing the loop. Univ J Public Health. 2013;1:97.
De Cocker K, Veldeman C, De Bacquer D, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: focus group interviews in executives and employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:22.
Mansfield L, Hall J, Smith L, Rasch M, Reeves E, Dewitt S, et al. Could you sit down please? A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198483.
Yeager DS, Dahl RE, Dweck CS. Why interventions to influence adolescent behavior often fail but could succeed. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13:101–22.
Stand-secretary in class (n.d.) https://gbiomed.kuleuven.be/english/biomedia/stand-secretary-in-class-1. Accessed 18 Sept 2019.
Gardner B. A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit’ in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9:277–95.
Matson TE, Renz AD, Takemoto ML, McClure JB, Rosenberg DE. Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:706.
Lally P, Wardle J, Gardner B. Experiences of habit formation: a qualitative study. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16:484–9.
Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SHJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:89–112.
Sui W, Prapavessis H. Standing up for student health: an application of the health action process approach for reducing student sedentary behavior—randomised control pilot trial. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018;10:87–107.
The authors thank all students who volunteered to participate in the study.
OC was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Scheme scholarship and fee offset program.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Castro, O., Vergeer, I., Bennie, J. et al. Using the Behavior Change Wheel to Understand University Students’ Prolonged Sitting Time and Identify Potential Intervention Strategies. Int.J. Behav. Med. 28, 360–371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09926-0
- College students
- Sedentary behavior
- Sedentary time
- Intervention mapping
- Implementation research