Advertisement

Statistical Guideline #3: Designate and Justify Covariates A Priori, and Report Results With and Without Covariates

  • Suzanne C. SegerstromEmail author
Integrative Review

Abstract

From the Editors: This is one in a series of statistical guidelines designed to highlight common statistical considerations in behavioral medicine research. The goal was to briefly discuss appropriate ways to analyze and present data in the International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM). Collectively, the series will culminate in a set of basic statistical guidelines to be adopted by IJBM and integrated into the journal’s official Instructions for Authors and also to serve as an independent resource. If you have ideas for a future topic, please email the Statistical Editor, Suzanne Segerstrom at segerstrom@uky.edu.

Keywords

Statistical guidelines Covariates Statistical control Statistical adjustment 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author, and so there was no requirement for informed consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu K. Measurement error and its impact on partial correlation and multiple linear regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;127:864–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Segerstrom SC. Statistical Guideline #2. Report appropriate reliability for your sample, measure, and design. Int J Behav Med. In press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lynam DR, Hoyle RH, Newman JP. The perils of partialling: cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment. 2006;13:328–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller GA, Chapman JP. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J Abnormal Psychol. 2001;110:40–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Head ML, Holman L, Lanfear R, Kahn AT, Jennions MD. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014;143:534–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flack VF, Chang PC. Frequency of selecting noise variables in subset regression analysis: a simulation study. Am Stat. 1987;41:84–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Revenson TA. All other things are not equal: an ecological perspective on the relation between personality and disease. In: Friedman HS, editor. Personality and disease. New York: Wiley; 1990. p. 65–94.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hull JG, Tedlie JC, Lehn DA. Moderator variables in personality research: the problem of controlling for plausible alternatives. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1992;18:115–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Segerstrom SC, Castañeda JO, Spencer TE. Optimism effects on cellular immunity: testing the affective and persistence models. Pers Ind Diff. 2003;35:1615–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Segerstrom SC, Smith GT. Methods, variance, and error in psychoneuroimmunology research: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Segerstrom SC, editor. Oxford handbook of psychoneuroimmunology. New York: Oxford; 2012. p. 421–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations