Operationalizing Substantial Reduction in Functioning Among Young Adults with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract

Purpose

Chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis are fatiguing illnesses that often result in long-term impairment in daily functioning. In reviewing case definitions, Thrope et al. (Fatigue 4(3):175–188, 2016) noted that the vast majority of case definitions used to describe these illnesses list a “substantial reduction” in activities as a required feature for diagnosis. However, there is no consensus on how to best operationalize the criterion of substantial reduction.

Method

The present study used a series of receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses to explore the use of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), designed by Ware and Shelbourne for operationalizing the substantial reduction criterion in a young adult population (18–29 years old). We compared the sensitivity and specificity of various cutoff scores for the SF-36 subscales and assessed their usefulness in discriminating between a group of young adults with a known diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (n = 98) versus those without that diagnosis (n = 272).

Results

The four top performing subscales and their associated cutoffs were determined: Physical Functioning ≤ 80, General Health ≤ 47, Role Physical ≤ 25, and Social Functioning ≤ 50. Used in combination, these four cutoff scores were shown to reliably discriminate between the patients and controls in our sample of young adults.

Conclusion

The implications of these findings for employing the substantial reduction criterion in both clinical and research settings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Thorpe T, McManimen S, Gleason K, Stoothoff J, Newton JL, Strand EB, et al. Assessing current functioning as a measure of significant reduction in activity level. Fatigue. 2016;4(3):175–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Friedberg F, Dechene L, McKenzie MJ, Fontanetta R. Symptom patterns in long-duration chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2000;48(1):59–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jason LA, Richman JA, Rademaker AW, Jordan KM, Plioplys AV, Taylor RR, et al. A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(18):2129–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(12):953–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Carruthers BM, Jain AK, Meirleir KLD, Peterson DL, Klimas NG, Lerner AM, et al. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical working case definition, diagnostic and treatment protocols. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr. 2003;11(1):7–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Carruthers, BM, van de Sande MI, De Meirleir KL, Klimas NG, Broderick G, Mitchell T, Staines D, Powles ACP, Speight N, Vallings R, Bateman L, Baumgarten-Austrheim B, Bell DS, Carlo-Stella N, Chia J, Darragh A, Jo D, Lewis D, Light AR, Marshall-Gradisbik S, Mena I, Mikovits JA, Miwa K, Murkovska M, Pall ML, Stevens S. Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria. J Intern Med 2011;270(4):327–338.

  8. 8.

    Sunnquist M, Nicholson L, Jason LA, Friedman K. Access to medical care for individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome: a call for centers of excellence. Mod Clin Med Res. 2017;1(1):28–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Institute of Medicine. Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: redefining an illness (Report Brief). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2015. http://www.nap.edu/html/19012/MECFS_ReportBrief.pdf. Accessed 28 Jul 2017

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JM. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180(5):461–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Graf C. The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale. Am J Nurs. 2008;108(4):52–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schafer C, Evans M, Jason LA, So S, Brown A. Measuring substantial reductions in activity. J Prev Interv. 2015;43(1):5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Reeves WC, Wagner D, Nisenbaum R, Jones JF, Gurbaxani B, Solomon L, et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome—a clinically empirical approach to its definition and study. BMC Med. 2005;3(1):10–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jason LA, Brown M, Evans M, Anderson V, Lerch A, Brown A, et al. Measuring substantial reductions in functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(7):589–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Evans M, Jason LA. Effects of time frame on the recall reliability of CFS symptoms. Eval Health Prof. 2015;38(3):367–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jason LA, Najar N, Porter N, Reh C. Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control’s empirical chronic fatigue syndrome case definition. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2009;20(2):93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J. 1993;306(6890):1437–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mishra G, Schofield MJ. Norms for the physical and mental health component summary scores of the SF-36 for young, middle-aged and older Australian women. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(3):215–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ware JE. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, R.I: Quality Metric Inc.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zdunek M, Jason LA, Evans M, Jantke R, Newton J. A cross cultural comparison of disability and symptomology associated with CFS. Int J Psychol Behav Sci. 2015;5(2):98–107.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pinxsterhuis I, Sandvik L, Strand EB, Bautz-Holter E, Sveen U. Effectiveness of a group-based self-management program for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;31(1):93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Strand EB, Lillestol K, Jason LA, Tveito K, Diep LM, Valla SS, et al. Comparing the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire with physician assessments: a preliminary study. Fatigue. 2015;4(1):52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sunnquist, M. A reexamination of the cognitive behavioral model of chronic fatigue syndrome: investigating the cogency of the model’s behavioral pathway. Coll Sci Health Theses Diss 2016; 193.

  24. 24.

    Ohanian D, Brown A, Sunnquist M, Furst J, Nicholson L, Klebek L, et al. Identifying key symptoms differentiating myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome from multiple sclerosis. EC Neurology. 2016;4(1):41–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jason LA, Katz B, Gleason K, McManimen S, Sunnquist M, Thorpe T. A prospective study of infectious mononucleosis in college students. Int J Psychiatry. 2017;2(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Blake C, Codd MB, O’Meara YM. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey: normative data for the Irish population. Ir J Med Sci. 2000;169(3):195–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu R, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1992;32(1):40–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Corp IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0. IBM Corp: Armonk, NY; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zou KH, O’Malley AJ, Mauri L. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circ. 2007;115(5):654–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39(4):561–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Liu A, Bondell H. Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology. 2005;16(1):73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jason LA, McManimen S, Sunnquist M, Newton J, Strand EB. Clinical criteria versus a possible research case definition in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Fatigue. 2017;5(2):89–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant number AI105781).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard A. Jason.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gleason, K.D., Stoothoff, J., McClellan, D. et al. Operationalizing Substantial Reduction in Functioning Among Young Adults with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Int.J. Behav. Med. 25, 448–455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-018-9732-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chronic fatigue syndrome
  • Myalgic encephalomyelitis
  • Substantial reduction
  • CFS case definitions
  • Young adults